Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Український Ґік - ігри та кіно українською

@UkrGeekGames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,254subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648225392
TypeChannel
Username@UkrGeekGames
Created18 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UkrGeekGames

Growth

4,2544,2664,2607 August 2026 — 4,265 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,265 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,266 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,257 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,254 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,252–4,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:354,254-3
11 Aug 2026, 04:064,257-9
8 Aug 2026, 05:324,266+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:014,265no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:554,265first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 4,254 subscribers
Avg views / post
833
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held24 (4 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total19,989
Reactions total464
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 43s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

464 reactions across 24 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14230.6%
👍7215.5%
😁6313.6%
🤔5612.1%
🔥449.48%
🤡255.39%
🎉153.23%
😨143.02%
🤮143.02%
💩71.51%
👎61.29%
💔51.08%
🍌10.216%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.17%
1 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
928
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
881
over 23 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC171 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Є така гра BR1: Infinite — це екстракшн-шутер із цікавою монетизацією Про неї сперечались ще у 2023 році, але хайпанула вона зараз. Розповідаю. Тестерам платять 10 дорарів на годину. Але є нюанс: для того щоб піти у рейд ви робите ставку від 10 центів до 10 дорарів. За вбивство гравця у рейді ви отримуєте один дорар. Помираючи у катці ви втрачаєте ставку і те, що "заробили" протягом катки. Розрахунки, звісно у крип

👎1😨1

8 Aug 2026, 09:26 UTC413 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спін-офф по Грі в кальмара із Девідом Фінчером, оте що типу мало бути американським аналогом "шоу", відмінили🧐 Проте Netflix думає над "різними версіями для різних міжнародних ринків. Де серед можливих напрямків — Франція та Норвегія". Що б це не означало🤔 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

💔5🔥2

8 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC562 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

THQ Nordic анонсувала одразу три Готики: — класичну трилогію на консолях; — оновлення римейка першої частини; — настолку🫣 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

👍13🤮2

7 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC791 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Інсайдер стверджує, що Ubisoft може показати Beyond Good & Evil 2 наново до завершення року, але з нюансами😳 Скоріш за все, гра буде мати іншу назву, бо компанії треба відв'язати все те позитивне, що було колись від майже 20 років обіцянок. Крім того, сам проєкт дуже змінився навіть після другого анонсу 2017-го року 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

😁11🤔3

7 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC850 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Коли гра дійсно крута і не важливо, скільки їй років😍 Оригінальний Quake 1996 отримав безкоштовне оновлення Dawn of the Machine, яке включає: 19 нових мап для однокористувацької гри, хаб для гравця, нова музика, варіації ворогів та, звісно, секрети Додано у офіційне перевидання Quake та доступне на всіх платформах: PC, PS 4, 5, Xbox One, Series, Switch 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

19🔥5👍3

7 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC891 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Warner Bros. запустила у виробництво нову Матрицю. Прем'єру заплановано на 2028 рік💥 Це має бути розширення всесвіту, але історія "не має відійти далеко від елементів, що зробили оригінал культовим" 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

😁15🤔12👎4🤡2👍1

6 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC874 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дастін Деніел Креттон заявив, що Людину Павука 5 та Шан Чі 2 можна не чекати, доки він не зніме Наруто🥳 Зараз активно шукають акторів 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

🤔19🤡53👍1

6 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC861 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тим часом, 8 хвилин геймплею S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Cost of Hope😍 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgp6o6dBmNE 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

🎉15💩2👍1

6 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC877 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

GTA VI покажуть на 📱 27 серпня😆 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

13👍2🍌1🔥1🤡1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC881 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Дивились вже?) 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

😁23

6 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC861 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Phantom Blade Zero пішла на золото, а вже 11 серпня покажуть 10+ хвилин геймплею із сюжетом 🧐Предзамовлення стартують у той самий день. Реліз 29 жовтня 🎮 Український Ґік🍿

👍10🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC894 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥13🤮7🤔2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @UkrGeekGames. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 372,781 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Український Ґік - ігри та кіно українською” (@UkrGeekGames), 4,254 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UkrGeekGames.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.