Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 83 days, net -1,519. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,265–14,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 15:26
12,496
-19
2 Nov 2026, 12:49
12,515
+3
1 Nov 2026, 12:26
12,512
-14
31 Oct 2026, 10:45
12,526
-13
30 Oct 2026, 11:27
12,539
-19
29 Oct 2026, 09:27
12,558
-6
28 Oct 2026, 10:55
12,564
-6
27 Oct 2026, 14:26
12,570
-1
26 Oct 2026, 14:40
12,571
-10
25 Oct 2026, 11:20
12,581
+1
24 Oct 2026, 11:16
12,580
-16
22 Oct 2026, 10:56
12,596
-5
21 Oct 2026, 05:27
12,601
-11
20 Oct 2026, 04:51
12,612
-2
19 Oct 2026, 06:26
12,614
-5
18 Oct 2026, 06:40
12,619
-5
17 Oct 2026, 04:27
12,624
-12
16 Oct 2026, 03:47
12,636
+1
15 Oct 2026, 05:09
12,635
-8
14 Oct 2026, 03:37
12,643
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 27 May 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.44%
avg views ÷ 12,496 subscribers
Avg views / post
305
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.328%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
18 (27 May 2024 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
305
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 06:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
10
Links
1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,297 reactions across 17 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
765
33.3%
👍
486
21.2%
😁
382
16.6%
🔥
141
6.14%
🤯
58
2.53%
😱
52
2.26%
🎉
50
2.18%
🤬
43
1.87%
👏
42
1.83%
🙈
37
1.61%
🫡
30
1.31%
💅
23
1.00%
🙊
21
0.914%
🐳
20
0.871%
🥰
20
0.871%
😎
19
0.827%
🤡
19
0.827%
🤷♀
19
0.827%
🥴
14
0.609%
💊
12
0.522%
8 further kinds
44
1.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2024 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
IIT Roorkee Launched a Free Website Where You can Solve IIT JEE Last 20 Years PYQ's and You will Get Highly predicatable Questions for JEE 2027!
Must Register(Totally Free) 👇👇
https://tinyurl.com/ye23sfaf
https://tinyurl.com/ye23sfaf
Only limited free seats are available 👍
Important Notes 📖-
Electrochemical Cells🔋
► An electrochemical cell can convert electrical energy to chemical energy and can also convert electrical energy to chemical energy. There are two types of electrochemical cells- Galvanic cell and Electrolytic cell.
► Cathodes are usually metal electrodes. It is the electrode where reduction takes place. The cathode is the positive electrode in a galvanic cell and a negati…
Fig.: Relation between Mass, No. of moles and No. of molecules
---------------------------------------------------------
Interpretation of balanced chemical equations:
Once we get a balanced chemical equation then we can interpret a chemical equation by following ways: ✅
✿ Mass - mass analysis
✿ Mass - volume analysis
✿ Mole - mole analysis
𝐂𝐀𝐔𝐒𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝐒𝐄𝐋𝐅 𝐃𝐎𝐔𝐁𝐓 𝐈𝐍 𝐄𝐗𝐀𝐌
➩ 𝗘𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀
• High expectations of relatives
• Comparing with others
• Fear of Failures
➩ 𝗣𝘀𝘆𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀
• Feeling little or no control over
the exam situation
• Negative thinking and self-
criticism
• Low Self-esteem
➩ 𝗣𝗼𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝘆𝗹𝗲𝘀
• No proper coverage of the
entire syllabus
• Trying to memorize the
concepts
• Reading without
understanding th…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Uday_Batch_PW_2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PW Lakshya JEE Batch 2027 PW @PW_Lakshya_JEE_Batch_2027_PW · 22,328 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 27 September 2026
Kriti Champions Op Yt @Kriti_Champions_Op_Yt · 19,931 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 22 September 2026
Lakshya NEET Lectures 2027 PW @Lakshya_NEET_Lectures_2027_PW · 43,262 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 27 August 2026
@faisalsirpwgoatarmy | Prayas 1.0 GOAT ARMY @faisalsirpwgoatarmy · 23,365 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 September 2026
Biology by Vipin Sir @Biologybyvipinsir8 · 74,900 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 19 August 2026
Physics Short Notes NEET @physics_short_Notes_Neet · 19,134 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 30 September 2026
Shobhit Nirwan @shobhit_nirwan · 93,765 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 16 August 2026
Manish Raj mr sir Physics Wallah @Manish_Raj_Physics_Wallah_sir_MR · 84,011 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 August 2026
Pankaj Sir Chemistry Pscaa @Pankaj_Sir_Chemistry_PSCAA · 35,082 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 1 September 2026
Tarun Sir Sankalp NEET Vedantu @Tarun_Sir_Sankalp_NEET_Vedantu · 37,033 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 31 August 2026
@SamaptiMamZoology @SamaptiMamZoology6 · 124,908 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 13 August 2026
Exphub Prashant Kirad Class 9 10 @Exphub_Prashant_Kirad_9_Class_10 · 154,433 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 12 August 2026
Dr Manish Dubey MD SIR BMS @Dr_Manish_Dubey_MD_Sir_BMS · 38,150 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
Biology Short Notes NEET @biology_short_notes_neet · 46,303 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 14 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Uday Batch PW 2026” (@Uday_Batch_PW_2026), 12,496 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Uday_Batch_PW_2026.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.