4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,693–2,696 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 14:06
2,693
-2
10 Aug 2026, 20:55
2,695
-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:17
2,696
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:02
2,696
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 21 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 2,693 subscribers
Avg views / post
744
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.985%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (21 March 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
2,233
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
317 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
155
48.9%
❤
111
35.0%
🗿
42
13.2%
👎
8
2.52%
🔥
1
0.315%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 دوستان عزیزی که تمایل داشتن به پاسارگارد مهاجرت کنن و این کار براشون ترسناک و سخت بود براتون خبر خوبی داریم
💥 به تازگی دوست عزیزمون MrClocks ابزاری رو به صورت رایگان ارائه داده که به شما کمک میکنه به راحتی هر چه تمام از پنل های دیگه به پاسارگارد مهاجرت کنید . این ابزار علاوه بر امکان مهاجرت امکانات دیگه ای مثل تغییر دیتابیس و ریستور بکاپ به راحت ترین حالت ممکن براتون فراهم میکنه
⭐️ حتما به پروژه در گیت هاب ستاره…
𝗣𝗚𝗖𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗠𝗚
مهاجرت / ریستور / تغییر دیتابیس
- ریستور بکاپ اتوماتیک
- تبدیل دیتابیس های مختلف به یکدیگر
- مهاجرت آسان از سایر پنل ها به پاسارگارد
- مدیریت ارور ها و رفع اتوماتیک آنها
گیت هاب
⚠️ این نسخه بتا هست ، با وجود تست های مختلف همچنان امکان وجود باگ هست ، حتما از قبل بکاپ داشته باشید
💸 اگر از این پروژه راضی بودید و کمکی به شما کرد ، به پاس قدردانی از تیم پاسارگارد به آنها دونیت کنید
دونیت
⭐️ در صورت امکان ب…
🚀 Nemesis Scanner – Shadow Edition
پابلیک شد
حالا ممکنه بپرسید این پروژه چیه؟
پروژه Nemesis Scanner یه اسکنر شبکه و آسیبپذیری مبتنی بر Nmap هست که برای تست نفوذ، Red Team و ارزیابی امنیتی ساخته شده.
قابلیتها:
• اسکن سریع و کامل شبکه با چندین حالت مختلف
• شناسایی سرویسها، سیستمعامل و استفاده از Nmap NSE
• تشخیص آسیبپذیریها و ارتباط با CVE و Exploitها
• Attack Surface Mapping
• گزارشگیری در فرمتهای مختلف
• …
⚠️هشدار⚠️
اخیراً افرادی با سوءاستفاده از نام، آیدی و لوگوی پاسارگارد به کاربران پیام ارسال کرده و با عناوین مختلف درخواست وجه یا اطلاعات میکنند.
توجه داشته باشید که تیم پاسارگارد تحت هیچ شرایطی به صورت خصوصی به کاربران پیام نمیدهد و هیچگونه درخواست مالی از طریق پیام شخصی ندارد.
راههای رسمی ارتباط با تیم پاسارگارد:
• بخش Issues در GitHub
• دایرکت کانال تلگرام
همچنین تنها روش رسمی حمایت مالی از پروژه، پلتفرم دو…
🔴 آپدیت ورژن ۵ پنل پاسارگارد ریلیز شد 🔴
مهمترین تغییر این نسخه اضافه شدن سیستم Admin RBAC و Owner System هست که کنترل خیلی بیشتری روی ادمینها بهتون میده.
➕ محدود کردن تعداد یوزر قابل ساخت توسط هر ادمین
➕ تعیین حداقل و حداکثر حجم سرویسها
➕ تعیین حداقل و حداکثر مدت زمان سرویسها
➕ تعیین محدودیت HWID
➕ تعریف دسترسیهای مختلف برای هر نقش
همچنین از این به بعد تمام بخشهای ساخت، ویرایش و مدیریت کاربران بر اساس سطح د…
🇮🇷 اسکریپت نصب ویژه سرورهای ایران
برای کاربرانی که سرورشون داخل ایرانه و دسترسی به منابع خارجی ندارن، دو اسکریپت standalone آماده کردیم که از میرورهای ایرانی لینوکس و داکر استفاده میکنن:
🖥 نصب پنل:
https://github.com/PasarGuard/scripts/blob/main/iran-sanction/README-pasarguard-standalone.fa.md
⚙️ نصب نود:
https://github.com/PasarGuard/scripts/blob/main/iran-sanction/README-pg-node-standalone.fa.md
⚠️ نکته مهم:
ب…
قیمت جهانی استارلینک مینی با تخفیف به زیر ۲۰۰دلار (۳۶میلیون تومن) رسیده و پایینتر هم میاد. سایز دیشش هم اندازهی یه کاغذ A4 هست!
واقعیت اینکه شاید الان بشه جلوی اتصال به اینترنت رو گرفت ولی تا چند سال آینده عملا غیرممکنه ...
🔧 رفع باگ: قطع نشدن کاربر پس از حذف از طریق gRPC — پچ تیم PasarGuard
یک باگ شناختهشده در Xray-core باعث میشه که کاربرانی که از طریق gRPC API حذف میشن، کانکشن فعالشون قطع نشه و بتونن به ارسال ترافیک ادامه بدن. این مشکل برای خیلی از ادمینها دردسرساز شده — مشترکانی که از این باگ سوءاستفاده کردن و مصرف داده غیرمنتظره و قبضهای سنگین به بار آوردن.
تیم PasarGuard این مشکل رو شناسایی و برطرف کرده و یه Pull Request به…
تو این مدت فاکتور های هتزنر رو پرداخت کردید یا بیخیال اکانت شدید ؟
👍36🗿10❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @UbuntuCommands. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای بعضی از افراد عادی پیامک اینترنت پرو رفته ... پاسخ شما به اینترنت پرو چیه ؟
🖕87%
😍9%
🙏4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 712,790 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗨𝗯𝘂𝗻𝘁𝘂 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘀” (@UbuntuCommands), 2,693 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UbuntuCommands.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.