Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for U.S. Central Command

Channel

U.S. Central Command

@U_S_CENTCOM

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,342subscribers

+140 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002074785550
TypeChannel
Username@U_S_CENTCOM
DescriptionOfficial U.S. Notices Central Command (CENTCOM)
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/U_S_CENTCOM

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,0878,3428,214.56 August 2026 — 8,202 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,199 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,192 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,173 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,161 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,136 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,125 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,091 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,087 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,180 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,239 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,279 subscribers17 September 2026 — 8,281 subscribers25 September 2026 — 8,275 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,288 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,274 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,283 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,292 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,290 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,293 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,298 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,282 subscribers1 November 2026 — 8,275 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,279 subscribers7 November 2026 — 8,289 subscribers11 November 2026 — 8,342 subscribers6 August 202611 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 98 days, net +140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,049–8,380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 21:498,342+53
7 Nov 2026, 20:118,289+10
4 Nov 2026, 21:448,279+4
1 Nov 2026, 18:508,275-7
29 Oct 2026, 23:098,282-16
27 Oct 2026, 01:178,298+5
23 Oct 2026, 14:508,293+3
20 Oct 2026, 14:178,290-2
17 Oct 2026, 12:088,292+9
14 Oct 2026, 09:168,283+9
11 Oct 2026, 02:568,274-14
4 Oct 2026, 20:168,288+13
25 Sept 2026, 09:598,275-6
17 Sept 2026, 02:598,281+2
12 Sept 2026, 22:388,279+40
8 Sept 2026, 21:018,239+59
4 Sept 2026, 00:418,180+93
31 Aug 2026, 08:528,087-4
28 Aug 2026, 09:248,091-34
25 Aug 2026, 04:568,125first reading

Engagement

67 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
58.7%
avg views ÷ 8,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,890
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 67 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held67 (23 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total92,980
Reactions total1,536
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,070
Videos
≈317
Links
≈320

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 21s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,146 reactions across 60 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,50648.7%
🫡1,03520.1%
👍75714.7%
🙏69913.6%
👌1152.23%
💔340.661%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,941 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,600 views58 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

U.S. Sailors transport needed supplies from USNS Alan Shepard (T-AKE 3) to aircraft carrier USS George Washington (CVN 73) during a vertical replenishment at sea. @U_S_CENTCOM

❤32🫡9👍8🙏8💔1

8 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC≈4,460 views84 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

U.S. Marines conduct a water purification test in the well deck of USS Comstock (LSD 45) to ensure they are capable of providing service members safe, potable water when operating in the field. @U_S_CENTCOM

👍39❤27👌6🫡6🙏5💔1

7 Nov 2026, 21:31 UTC≈3,050 views86 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

CENTCOM forces disabled a commercial vessel in the Gulf of Oman, Nov. 7, after the ship’s civilian crew ignored repeated warnings and attempted to violate the naval blockade against Iran multiple times. A U.S. military aircraft fired precision munitions at the stern of St. Kitts-flagged M/V Huda, disabling the ship after CENTCOM forces directed the crew to abandon targeted spaces. The cargo vessel tried to depart reg…

❤59🫡14🙏7💔3👍2👌1

3 Nov 2026, 13:59 UTC≈4,270 views84 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

U.S. Army paratroopers load a 155 millimeter artillery round into an M777 howitzer during a field artillery live-fire exercise in the Middle East. @U_S_CENTCOM

❤52🙏16👍8🫡8

2 Nov 2026, 02:16 UTC≈4,840 views83 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🚫 CLAIM: Iran’s foreign minister recently claimed publicly that Iran has not attacked civilians in neighboring countries. This is FALSE. ✅ FACT: Iran has not only intentionally attacked civilian infrastructure, neighborhoods, and other facilities in neighboring Gulf countries, but it has also deliberately attacked civilian mariners at sea — killing more than 20 in recent months. Iran’s indiscriminate aggression is c…

👍57🙏13🫡9❤4

31 Oct 2026, 19:45 UTC≈4,180 views71 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

A U.S. Navy MH-60R Sea Hawk takes off from the flight deck of USS George Washington (CVN 73) as the aircraft carrier supports enforcement of America’s ironclad blockade against Iran. As of Oct. 31, U.S. forces have redirected 144 commercial vessels to ensure compliance. @U_S_CENTCOM

❤45🫡12🙏10👍4

30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC≈4,340 views85 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Video

Update from CENTCOM Commander: @U_S_CENTCOM

❤54🫡15🙏10👍6

29 Oct 2026, 11:54 UTC≈3,950 views84 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

A U.S. Air Force F-16 fighter jet flies over the Middle East. @U_S_CENTCOM

🫡44🙏19❤17👍4

28 Oct 2026, 22:40 UTC≈3,780 views83 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🚫 CLAIM: Over recent days and weeks, Iranian-controlled media have reported Iranian claims that commercial vessels are hitting sea mines while transiting the Strait of Hormuz. These claims are FALSE. ✅ FACT: All internationally recognized primary transit routes through the Strait of Hormuz have been cleared of sea mines by U.S. forces and remain so. Thousands of commercial vessels have safely used the transit lanes …

👍43❤18🙏12🫡9💔1

27 Oct 2026, 13:20 UTC≈3,970 views74 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🚫 CLAIM: The navy commander for Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps recently claimed that U.S. forces have abandoned the Strait of Hormuz by moving hundreds of "kilometers" away. This is FALSE. ✅ FACT: U.S. forces deployed to the Middle East remain present and vigilant in the Strait of Hormuz and surrounding waters, as demonstrated by the CENTCOM commander this weekend. U.S. forces and regional partners control…

❤41🫡18👍8🙏6💔1

26 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC≈3,660 views74 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

U.S. Sailors refuel aircraft during flight operations aboard USS George Washington (CVN 73). Every military mission success begins and ends with people. @U_S_CENTCOM

❤45🫡15🙏10👍3💔1

25 Oct 2026, 16:16 UTC≈5,210 views82 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

An F-35C Lightning II lands on the flight deck of USS George Washington (CVN 73) as the aircraft carrier continues operations in the Arabian Sea. @U_S_CENTCOM

❤51🫡20🙏8👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @U_S_CENTCOM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تعلم كل يوم حديث
@dailyhadeeth · 18,730
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 4 October 2026
🇮🇱 חדשות 360
@newsil360 · 19,012
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“U.S. Central Command” (@U_S_CENTCOM), 8,342 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/U_S_CENTCOM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.