Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AMBOSS

@USMLE_AMBOSS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,472subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001557016838
TypeChannel
Username@USMLE_AMBOSS
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/USMLE_AMBOSS

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 6 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 8 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@USMLE_AMBOSS/1497 · this entry4 May 2023, 20:27 UTC@kaplanusmles/45514 May 2023, 20:35 UTC1.008 minutes
@USMLE_AMBOSS/1502 · this entry20 May 2023, 15:20 UTC@kaplanusmles/455920 May 2023, 15:24 UTC1.003 minutes
@USMLE_AMBOSS/1504 · this entry20 May 2023, 19:23 UTC@kaplanusmles/456120 May 2023, 19:25 UTC1.002 minutes
@kaplanusmles/456421 May 2023, 14:56 UTC@USMLE_AMBOSS/1507 · this entry21 May 2023, 15:00 UTC1.004 minutes
@USMLE_AMBOSS/1509 · this entry21 May 2023, 20:01 UTC@kaplanusmles/456621 May 2023, 20:58 UTC1.0057 minutes
@Mcat_uworld/16074 May 2023, 20:26 UTC@USMLE_AMBOSS/1497 · this entry4 May 2023, 20:27 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kaplanusmles9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006 minutesthis entry (54)
@Mcat_uworld6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minuteseven
@pathology_videoz6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (42)
@Becker_videos_step18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (71)
@Usmle_pharma8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@Usmle_pharma (53)
@Vid_Physeo_S7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Vid_Physeo_S (52)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 April 2023 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @Mcat_uworld. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

3,4723,4813,476.56 August 2026 — 3,481 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,478 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,472 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,471–3,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 00:303,472-6
7 Aug 2026, 09:083,478-3
6 Aug 2026, 14:473,481first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 30 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.058%
avg views ÷ 3,472 subscribers
Avg views / post
2.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (30 April 20237 August 2026)
Views total2
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎧 How to Access Deep Dive in Step 1 and Step 2 🥳: 1️⃣ Open Previous Tests or Create a New Test 2️⃣ Tap the Mind Map icon 🧠 3️⃣ Inside the Mind Map, tap the Explainer icon 💡 4️⃣ Select Deep Dive Explainer 🎙 — approximately 6-10 minutes 🚀 Learn the reasoning step by step with a natural, podcast-style explanation. 👇👇👇👇👇👇 usmle.medicospira.com Telegram channel 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 👇 Medicospira channel

10 May 2026, 00:14 UTC416 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NBMECMSPhoto

🎉NBME Qbank Surprise! 🤩🤩 NBME Step 1 Qbank Mode is here 💥 4000+ NBME Qs • Smart filters • AI tools • Deep analytics 🚀 Join now & boost your Step 1 prep! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔗 [Sgin up Free account] join NBMEWAY telegarm channel: @NBMECMS

25 Nov 2025, 22:56 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Mcat_uworldPhoto

🏪 😇😇🥰🥰 🥰😇🥰🥰🥰😇 NOV 😅😇😅😇 You don't need more resources. You need the Right ones. We built MCAT Way to be the end of the search.. 🧠 From Day 1 to White Coat. 🔓 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/4YUjzWlMtTQ1ZGZh

14 Oct 2025, 21:00 UTC≈1,670 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NBMEStep2ckPhoto

📈📉 Stop Losing Points on Ethics! 👀 😮 Our NEW USMLE Ethics & Public Health Course on Udemy is designed to give you a complete, high-yield mastery of these tricky subjects. Turn the most confusing section into your score-boosting strength! ⭐️ Exclusive Launch Discount: Use the link below—your coupon is automatically applied! Enroll Now & Master Ethics https://www.udemy.com/course/usmle-public-health-ethics/?couponCo

19 Jul 2025, 16:31 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NBMECMSPhoto

🎉NBME Qbank Surprise! 🤩🤩 NBME Step 1 Qbank Mode is here 💥 4000+ NBME Qs • Smart filters • AI tools • Deep analytics 🚀 Join now & boost your Step 1 prep! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔗 [Sgin up Free account] join NBMEWAY telegarm channel: @NBMECMS

23 May 2025, 12:22 UTC≈1,820 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @USMLEpodcast

🎙 Welcome to the USMLE Crush Podcast Channel! 🧠📚 Hey future doctors! 👋 Welcome to the USMLE Crush Podcast — your ultimate audio course designed to help you master high-yield Step 1 concepts through real NBME & UWorld-based cases. Each episode simplifies complex topics, reinforces must-know facts, and helps you crush Step 1 with confidence. From immuno to pharm, neuro to pulm — we’ve got it all. 🎧 Listen. Learn. Cr

23 May 2025, 08:19 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @USMLEpodcastPhoto

Your new go-to audio series for mastering USMLE Step 1 — one high-yield case at a time. 💡 Short episodes. 🧠 Real NBME & UWorld-style questions. 📚 High-yield breakdowns across all systems. 🔥 Learn smart. Think like the test maker. Crush the exam. 📲 Follow the channel for new episodes and study drops every week. 🎧 Let’s get started — your Step 1 success begins here. https://t.me/USMLEpodcast #USMLECrushPodcast #Step

21 Mar 2025, 11:54 UTC≈1,860 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ace the USMLE Step 1! 😎 High-Yield Topics | Clear Explanations | Fast Review Join now with this link: https://www.udemy.com/course/usmle-step-1-high-yield-topics-overview/?

9 Mar 2025, 21:05 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

☄️ 2025 USMLE Recalls: Dominate the Exam! ☄️ Your success is our mission. 🙂 No more stress, no more guesswork. Our proven recall strategies will give you the edge you need to crush the USMLE. 👑 Why settle for average when you can be exceptional? With expert guidance and a tailored approach, you’ll be ready to achieve your highest score yet. 🔥Don’t wait—your future is calling. 👋 Take action now and secure your sp

6 Feb 2025, 15:13 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @USMLERECALLS2021Photo

🥳 2025 usmle recalls 🥳 🤩Rock your USMLE exam 🤩 😇Don't let the stress of the exam impact your success any longer. 😇Our proven recall strategies will provide you with the tools you need to confidently and accurately ace the exam . With our expert guidance and personalized approach, you can finally achieve the USMLE score you've been dreaming of😎. 👋Don't wait any longer to take control of your future. Sign up for o

11 Jan 2025, 14:33 UTC≈2,350 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @USMLERECALLS2021Photo

🥳 2025 usmle recalls 🥳 🤩Rock your USMLE exam 🤩 😇Don't let the stress of the exam impact your success any longer. 😇Our proven recall strategies will provide you with the tools you need to confidently and accurately ace the exam . With our expert guidance and personalized approach, you can finally achieve the USMLE score you've been dreaming of😎. 👋Don't wait any longer to take control of your future. Sign up for o

21 May 2023, 20:01 UTC≈7,160 viewsread 7 August 2026

Educational objective: Tay-Sachs disease is an autosomal recessive disorder caused by [3-hexosaminidase A deficiency, which results in GM2 ganglioside accumulation. Key clinical features include progressive neurodegeneration and a cherry-red macular spot. In contrast to patients with Niemann-Pick disease, those with Tay Sachs disease have no hepatosplenomegaly.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @USMLE_AMBOSS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 May 2023, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz404 voters

Accumulation of which of the following metabolites is most likely present in this patient's tissues?

  1. A. Galactocerebroside14%
  2. B. Globotriaosylceramide4%
  3. C. Glucocerebroside12%
  4. D.Glycogen8%
  5. E. GM2 ganglioside42%
  6. F. Heparan sulfate6%
  7. G .Sphingomyelin14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 May 2023, 15:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz277 voters

Which of the following microbial components is directly responsible for the severity of disease in this patient?

  1. A. Capsular polysaccharide21%
  2. B. lmmunoglobulin protease9%
  3. C. Lipo-oligosaccharide44%
  4. D.Lipoteichoic acid9%
  5. E. Superantigen exotoxin17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 May 2023, 20:27 UTCAnonymous Quiz261 voters

The patient most likely suffered from which of the following?

  1. A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis60%
  2. B. Poliomyelitis17%
  3. C.Rabies4%
  4. D.Huntington disease9%
  5. E. Friedreich ataxia5%
  6. F. Vitamin 812 deficiency5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2023 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,028,205 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AMBOSS” (@USMLE_AMBOSS), 3,472 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USMLE_AMBOSS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.