Channel
@USF_IT1_MCQ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
538subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002483740232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @USF_IT1_MCQ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/USF_IT1_MCQ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 538 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 536 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 536 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Banker’s algorithm requires processes to declare:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
When a resource is allocated, a request edge becomes an assignment edge.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Assignment edge converts directly to request edge when released.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A dashed line in resource-allocation graph represents:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
When a process requests a resource, a claim edge becomes:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Banker’s algorithm is used when resources have multiple instances.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In Banker’s algorithm, processes do not need to declare maximum demand.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
A process may be forced to wait even if the resource is available.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Once a process gets all its required resources, it must eventually release them.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Banker’s algorithm allows unsafe states.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Banker’s algorithm is used when each resource type has only one instance.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
When there are multiple instances of resources, cycle does not always mean deadlock.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @USF_IT1_MCQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
When there are multiple instances of resources, cycle does not always mean deadlock.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Avoidance algorithms depend on the number of resource instances.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which algorithm is used when each resource type has multiple instances?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
If each resource type has only one instance, deadlock avoidance can use:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Why is Banker’s algorithm needed for multiple instances?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Banker’s algorithm is used when each resource type has only one instance.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 18 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔰 اللجنة العلمية MCQ IT-2_2025🔰” (@USF_IT1_MCQ), 538 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/USF_IT1_MCQ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.