Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prashant Tiwari Official

Channel

Prashant Tiwari Official

@UPSC_with_Prashant_1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,654subscribers

-59 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001702715443
TypeChannel
Username@UPSC_with_Prashant_1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UPSC_with_Prashant_1

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,6546,7136,683.523 August 2026 — 6,713 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,711 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,702 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,695 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,686 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,679 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,661 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,654 subscribers23 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 22 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,645–6,722 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 04:406,654-7
11 Sept 2026, 18:376,661-18
7 Sept 2026, 10:586,679-7
2 Sept 2026, 05:186,686-9
30 Aug 2026, 06:526,695-7
27 Aug 2026, 11:566,702-9
24 Aug 2026, 13:546,711-2
23 Aug 2026, 18:006,713first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.112%
avg views ÷ 6,654 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.4
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
7
of 7 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held7 (23 August 202623 August 2026)
Views total52
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC4 viewsread 23 August 2026

Sorry aspirants we can take only 200 aspirants as of now on first come first basis. This link will be removed after 200. https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl

23 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC7 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @upsc_toppers_notes_copies_pdfsPhoto

⭐️Highest Ratio in India in PRELIMS 2026 Current Affairs. 🚨UPSC PRE CURRENT AFFAIRS SOURCES. 🚨CHECK 40 Direct Hits/references Proof : DOWNLOAD Full PDF Join st links below 👇: 🔥CT30 Magazines + Classes : https://zoomdw.courses.store/873473 🔥CT 30 magazines : https://zoomdw.courses.store/880649 JOIN TELEGRAM : https://t.me/addlist/fdKL4cb2W7I2YTk1

23 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC6 viewsread 23 August 2026
Video

This access will be provided to the first 100 Subscribers! Strictly on a first come first served basis 👇👇 https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl

23 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC8 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @upsc_toppers_notes_copies_pdfs

https://t.me/civilscampus UPPCS BPSC RO/ARO के लिए जल्दी ज्वाइन करें PCS SELECTED TEAM द्वारा संचालित CHANNEL Join 👉 @civilscampus

23 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC6 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @upsc_toppers_notes_copies_pdfsFile

ONE STOP SOLUTION #UPPCS #LOWERPCS #BPSC #UPSSSC Join UPPCS 2026 + RO/ARO integrated Batch details https://t.me/civilscampus/2306

23 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC10 viewsread 23 August 2026

⭕️ Due to Huge Demand from UPSC ASPIRANTS they have created a private channel for UPSC 2026 only.👇 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl Join their Private Group Now ⚠ opened for few minutes only. ⚠ 🚷50 members entry only 👇👇

23 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC11 viewsread 23 August 2026

Sorry aspirants we can take only 200 aspirants as of now on first come first basis. This link will be removed after 200. https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl https://t.me/+LoreVh3FaGw1ODRl 🚷50 members entry only 👇👇

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @UPSC_with_Prashant_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Prashant Tiwari
@UPSCwithPrashant · 183,905
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prashant Tiwari Official” (@UPSC_with_Prashant_1), 6,654 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSC_with_Prashant_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.