Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UPSC Environment Ecology MCQs Quiz

Channel

UPSC Environment Ecology MCQs Quiz

@UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Quiz

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

27,282subscribers

-1,999 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001579531787
TypeChannel
Username@UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Quiz
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Quiz

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

8.0 average views per post against 27,330 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.029%. Across the 6,391 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,617 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.54% and 14.4%, with a median of 6.81%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured125 of 125 published in the window (125 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled999
Mature posts only0.031% over 117 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers27,330 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 6,391 channels · p10 0.671% · p25 2.54% · p50 6.81% · p75 14.4% · p90 25.3%
Position in cohort0.391th percentile · 1/250 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.106% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

27,28229,28128,281.57 August 20268 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,999. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,982–29,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 04:1927,282-15
7 Nov 2026, 03:3927,297-20
6 Nov 2026, 05:1627,317-13
5 Nov 2026, 05:3527,330-9
4 Nov 2026, 02:1627,339-25
3 Nov 2026, 03:5927,364-16
2 Nov 2026, 00:5827,380-9
1 Nov 2026, 02:4127,389-24
31 Oct 2026, 05:4827,413-23
30 Oct 2026, 02:1927,436-18
29 Oct 2026, 00:3727,454-22
27 Oct 2026, 23:1927,476-21
26 Oct 2026, 22:4427,497-22
25 Oct 2026, 20:5727,519-18
24 Oct 2026, 19:0827,537-18
23 Oct 2026, 21:1727,555-16
22 Oct 2026, 21:4927,571-24
21 Oct 2026, 22:0927,595-24
20 Oct 2026, 20:4127,619-12
19 Oct 2026, 19:1127,631first reading

Engagement

310 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.03%
avg views ÷ 27,282 subscribers
Avg views / post
8.3
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
107
of 310 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held310 (3 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total885
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 20m
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 107 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC2 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizFile

File, posted without a caption

2 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC2 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizFile

File, posted without a caption

2 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC2 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizFile

File, posted without a caption

2 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC2 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizFile

File, posted without a caption

2 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC2 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizPhoto

MISSION EPFO - Prelims Notes Series || 2026-27 LEAVE HERD MENTALITY & FINALLY END THIS LOOP OF EXAMS! TIME IS LESS -> ALL CONTENT AT ONE PLACE! (A to Z) Features of Our Notes ✅ Concise yet Comprehensive Coverage- In Table Format ✅ Special Focus on Previous Year Questions (PYQs) ✅ 1 year Current Affairs Compilation specially for EPFO ✅ Dedicated PDFs for Quant, Reasoning & English 🔥 SANKALP - 40 (40 day MCQ revisi…

2 Nov 2026, 12:14 UTC3 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizFile

🔥 Just check out the QUALITY! 🔥💯 Now you know why students are loving our content! ❤️📚 ✅ Concise, complete & exam-oriented notes ✅ PYQ-based content for smart preparation ✅ Subject-wise question banks featuring PYQs from various UPSC exams ✅ One-page revision tables for every chapter. 🎯 Contact @sop_for_success

2 Nov 2026, 12:14 UTC3 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizPhoto

🌿 EPFO KA AMRIT — Notes & Test Series || UPSC APFC 2026 🌿 Study On Point. Score on Point. ✅ Every Chapter & Section covered, in simple English ✅ Key Terms, Exam Traps, Revision Tables & PYQ Booklet ✅ Daily subject-wise tests with instant score + detailed solutions ✅ Daily Quant, Reasoning & English practice with PYQs 📚SAMPLES 📌 BROCHURE 📖DOWNLOAD FREE PYQ BOOKLET 💰 Price: ₹‌1‌4‌9‌7‌ → Only ₹799 📢 Join for Daily C…

2 Nov 2026, 05:14 UTC4 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizPhoto

We’ve been aspirants ourselves, and we know how difficult it can be to navigate UPSC preparation and decide which coaching promises to trust. That’s why we’re putting so much effort into building something meaningful for our fellow aspirants — offering the kind of guidance and support we know this journey needs. 1:1 Personal Mentorship at the Price of Group Mentorship! Get personalised guidance from an All India R…

1 Nov 2026, 12:23 UTC7 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizPhoto

MISSION EPFO - Prelims Notes Series || 2026-27 LEAVE HERD MENTALITY & FINALLY END THIS LOOP OF EXAMS! TIME IS LESS -> ALL CONTENT AT ONE PLACE! (A to Z) Features of Our Notes ✅ Concise yet Comprehensive Coverage- In Table Format ✅ Special Focus on Previous Year Questions (PYQs) ✅ 1 year Current Affairs Compilation specially for EPFO ✅ Dedicated PDFs for Quant, Reasoning & English 🔥 SANKALP - 40 (40 day MCQ revisi…

31 Oct 2026, 14:48 UTC5 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizPhoto

🌿 EPFO KA AMRIT — Notes & Test Series || Complete Package for UPSC APFC 2026 🌿 Study On Point. Score on Point. ✅ Every Chapter & Section covered, in simple English ✅ Key Terms, Exam Traps, Revision Tables & PYQ Booklet ✅ Daily subject-wise tests with instant score + detailed solutions ✅ Daily Quant, Reasoning & English practice with PYQs 📚SAMPLES 📌 BROCHURE 🗓️ DAILY TEST TIMETABLE ✔️ FREE SYLLABUS CHECKLIST 📖D…

31 Oct 2026, 14:48 UTC8 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizFile

🔥 Just check out the QUALITY! 🔥💯 Now you know why students are loving our content! ❤️📚 ✅ Concise, complete & exam-oriented notes ✅ PYQ-based content for smart preparation ✅ Subject-wise question banks featuring PYQs from various UPSC exams ✅ One-page revision tables for every chapter. 🎯

31 Oct 2026, 13:39 UTC4 viewsread 2 November 2026
Forwarded from @UPSC_Prelims_MCQs_QuizPhoto

🎯 IAS ANALYTICA – PRELIMS TEST SERIES 2027 | Edudeem IAS No Second Attempt for Prelims Most aspirants don’t miss Prelims by 20 marks. They miss it by 2–4 marks they already knew, lost to silly mistakes. IAS Analytica is built to find those marks. 📚 29 TESTS | 4 COMPONENTS ▪️ 14 Sectional Tests + Video Discussion ▪️ 6 Subject Revisional Tests ▪️ 5 Full Length Mock Tests ▪️ 4 CSAT Tests 🆕 WHAT’S NEW 🧬 Test DNA Repo…

Showing the 12 most recent of 310 posts we hold for @UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Quiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Quiz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
16 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UPSC Environment Ecology MCQs Quiz” (@UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Quiz), 27,282 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSC_Environment_Ecology_Quiz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.