Channel
@UPSCEXAMTIPS
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,898subscribers
-607 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001405809626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UPSCEXAMTIPS |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UPSCEXAMTIPS |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 23,898 | -33 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 05:20 | 23,931 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:36 | 23,956 | -33 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 23,989 | -44 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 24,033 | -65 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 24,098 | -38 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 24,136 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:03 | 24,145 | -25 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:05 | 24,170 | -28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 24,198 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 24,207 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 24,233 | -15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 24,248 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 24,258 | -10 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 24,268 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 24,285 | -25 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 24,310 | -20 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 24,330 | -17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 24,347 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 24,352 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (12 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 18,808 |
| Reactions total | 353 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,609 reactions across 35 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 890 | 55.3% | |
| 🔥 | 234 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 123 | 7.64% | |
| 🙏 | 122 | 7.58% | |
| 💯 | 55 | 3.42% | |
| 🎉 | 48 | 2.98% | |
| 👌 | 46 | 2.86% | |
| 👏 | 28 | 1.74% | |
| 🤣 | 25 | 1.55% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 1.24% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.311% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.249% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.249% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 0.186% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.124% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,609 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
कहते हैं ज्ञानी के साथ ही ज्ञान की बातें करनी चाहिए, अज्ञानी आपके हर तर्क को बेतुकी बातों से गलत साबित कर देंगे। क्योंकि ज्ञानी व्यक्ति ही आपकी बातों के महत्व और आशय को समझेगा, इसीलिए अपने शब्दों को बेवकूफ़ों पर व्यर्थ न करें। 🍃
❤25💯4👍3🤩1
अगर आपने खुली आंखों से आईएएस बनने का सपना देखा है और आपने उस सपने को पूरा करने का जोश लगन और जुनून है। अगर आप देश दुनिया के घटनाक्रम के प्रति जागरूकता रखते हैं। अपने देश व समाज के प्रति सरोकार और संवेदना का भाव है तो जुड़ जाइए अपने इस सपने को पंख लगाने के लिए उम्मीदों का आसमान आपकी प्रतीक्षा कर रहा है। Join 👉 @iasipsmotivation
🔥31❤8
🥹🥹
🤣24❤8🥰4
❤️🌹
❤33🔥12🥰4😍2
✅ ASPIRANT से ❤️ OFFICER तक का सफर तय करना है मुझे ✅🔥 ये civil services की तैयारी है ऑफिसर बाद में पहले अच्छा इंसान बनाती है✍🔥
🔥34❤12👍3😘3
आखिर क्यों ❓ ● आखिर क्यों हम एक किताब 10 बार पढ़ने की बजाय 10 तरह की किताबें पढ़ना ज्यादा पसंद करते हैं ! Ex . - सिविल सेवा की तैयारी करने वाला छात्र अपने घर को लाइब्रेरी बनाकर बैठ जाता है ... सफलता बहुत सी किताबें पढ़ने से नहीं बल्कि एक किताब को बहुत बार पढ़ने से मिलती है ● आखिर क्यों हम सीखने के समय में सीखने की बजाय सिखाना ज्यादा पसंद करते हैं ! Ex . - हर रोज प्रतियोगी छात्र फरमान जारी करते हैं ...मैं आईएएस की तैया…
❤30👍8💯1🔥1
♦️#UPSC CSE ESSAY 2026
❤12😍3
❤️
❤43🔥9
सिर्फ 7 साल की उम्र में 101 बार Hula Hoop घुमाकर Guinness World Record बनाने वाली जयपुर की सिनाया बियानी आज ‘Jaipur Hooper’ के नाम से अपनी अलग पहचान बना चुकी हैं। 30 सेकंड में हाथ पर 101 rotations करके उन्होंने Under-16 category में पिछला 94 rotations का record तोड़ा। लेकिन इस एक record के पीछे महीनों की रोज़ की practice, discipline और लगातार मेहनत थी। इतनी छोटी उम्र में ही सिनाया 65+ stages पर perform कर चुकी हैं …
❤30🤩2🥰2🤣1
🙏 हे महादेव सुख देना तो बस इतना देना अहंकार ना आ जाए और दुख देना तो बस इतना देना की आस्था ना चली जाए ! 🌹 श्री शिवाय नमस्तुभ्यं 🙏
🙏38❤22👌2
. A Boy is born. A Man is made from Pain, Disrespect, Rejection, Failure and Losses. ❤️
💯26❤5👌2
"ज्ञान हेच भविष्य! शिक्षण हा प्रत्येक मुलाचा हक्क आहे." #SchoolThikKaro स्वतंत्रता दिवस की हार्दिक शुभकामनाएं 💓 जय हिंद! 🇮🇳
🔥17❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @UPSCEXAMTIPS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPSC Exam tips & motivational dose” (@UPSCEXAMTIPS), 23,898 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPSCEXAMTIPS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.