Channel
@UPCXchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,885subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001966010826 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UPCXchannel |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UPCXchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 1,885 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 1,898 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 1,909 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 1,910 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (15 March 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 102 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 70.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥 Imagine paying for your morning coffee, shopping online, and sending money overseas—all from one seamless payment experience. #UPCX is building a digital payment ecosystem designed to make everyday transactions simpler, faster, and more connected. The future of payments isn't about doing more⚡️ It's about making every #payment feel effortless. 🔗 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2085701861550514304
🎉 From WebX 2026 Highlights! UPCX had an amazing time at WebX 2026, discussing the future of blockchain and digital payments with industry leaders and the community. Thank you again to everyone who connected with us. Exciting things are ahead! 🚀 🔗 Official Tweet: https://x.com/i/status/2080830835880595541
❤7🔥2👏1
🙏 Thank you all for the two days of WebX2026! At the UPCX booth, we were visited by many of you each day, and the original goods ran out of distribution in about an hour after opening, receiving an overwhelmingly positive response beyond our expectations 🔥 At the booth, under the theme of Beyond Payments, we introduced use cases connected not only to payments but also to Onchain Finance and next-generation financia…
❤3
📈 The cross-border payments market is heading toward $290 trillion by 2030 🌍 ⏱ Blockchain settles in minutes. Traditional rails take days. 💸 The cost difference? Up to 7% saved. The math isn’t complicated. The infrastructure just needs to be ready when the volume arrives🚀 ⚙️ Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2045729152565682619
Most people think of payments as sending money from A to B 💸➡️💸. UPCX thinks further — scheduled payments, recurring payments, escrow, multi-sig, offline capability, NFC tap, Named Accounts ✨ Payments built for how life actually works, not just how banks want it to work 💡 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2045370495013401010
😁 South Korea's Toss — used by 30 million people, that's 60% of the country's population — is building its own L1 blockchain and filed 24 stablecoin trademarks ✅ When the world's most advanced mobile-first financial apps start building on-chain, the mass adoption conversation becomes real ⚡️ 🔗 https://t.co/ijzkK67oJZ 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2045000564681908524
🎙️ CMO CHAT: AI + Web3 — Real Infrastructure or Just Marketing Noise ❓ AI is everywhere. But is it actually being built into Web3, or is it just a talking point? Join us this Thursday as we cut through the hype, explore where AI and Web3 are genuinely converging, and what that means for the road ahead. 🗓 16 April 2026 🔜 1PM UTC 🔗https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1lKQRvjWqLZGE?s=20 Don't miss it — mark your calendar 🔥 💬 …
⭐️ Imagine your wallet address being @yourshop instead of 0x4f3a...d82c~ 💡 UPCX Named Accounts make that real - readable, tradeable, memorable on-chain identities. 🚀 The biggest barrier to Web3 payments isn't speed or cost. It's the moment someone has to copy-paste a 42-character string and hope they got it right. 🔗 Simplicity is the future of adoption. 🔥 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2042780931619008777
💵 Ripple + Convera just launched a stablecoin sandwich model 🥪 Dollars in, stablecoin in the middle 😀, local currency is out.. 140 currencies. 200 countries. near-instant settlement New rules for real-time payments kick in globally this April 2026 🗓 The question isn't whether this shift is happening 🤔 it's who built the infrastructure for it first. 🔗 Link: https://t.co/XSsPbclA9y 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/s…
Web3 and crypto raised 💰 $9.27 billion across 255 deals in Q1 2026 alone. March delivered $6.04B💲nearly 6× February's pace payments infrastructure captured $2.8B of that the money knows where the opportunity is 🎯 🔗 https://cryip.co/web3-and-crypto-fundraising-report-for-q1-2026/ 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2040750056316264527
⚡️ NTT. Japan's largest telecom. 100 million+ subscribers. They don't sign MOUs for fun When enterprise players at that scale start positioning in Web3 payments, it's worth paying attention to why. 🔗 https://t.co/rjiNb6hdfc 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/i/status/2037465919245418632
❤2
👉 Here's something worth thinking about — most Web3 startups don't fail because of bad code they fail because payment infrastructure breaks the moment real users show up 38% of people who try to buy crypto with a card hit a wall and leave. they don't come back. UX isn't separate from infrastructure. it IS infrastructure 🔥 💬 Tweet Link: https://x.com/Upcxofficial/status/2037092383343464873
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @UPCXchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 916,761 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@UPCXchannel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UPCX Channel” (@UPCXchannel), 1,885 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UPCXchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.