Gambling & betting â a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelâs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelâs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured â it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@ULTRAPRONOSWIN77CAP was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today â only that this channel no longer does.
@BRAVOPRONOSWIN77 held 28 August 2026 â 28 August 2026
Growth
17 measurements spanning 34 days, net -818. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between â snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean âno change observedâ, never âinterpolatedâ.
Measurement log â every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 11:22
47,531
+128
2 Sept 2026, 20:13
47,403
-119
1 Sept 2026, 15:13
47,522
-116
31 Aug 2026, 14:32
47,638
-80
30 Aug 2026, 16:12
47,718
-94
29 Aug 2026, 17:55
47,812
-64
28 Aug 2026, 22:46
47,876
+47,874
23 Aug 2026, 21:35
2
-47,964
21 Aug 2026, 09:47
47,966
-26
20 Aug 2026, 09:47
47,992
-67
19 Aug 2026, 07:57
48,059
-36
18 Aug 2026, 09:22
48,095
-54
17 Aug 2026, 10:58
48,149
-52
15 Aug 2026, 17:53
48,201
-95
14 Aug 2026, 03:17
48,296
-24
12 Aug 2026, 23:18
48,320
-29
12 Aug 2026, 01:01
48,349
first reading
Engagement
202 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 â the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelâs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegramâs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.53%
avg views ÷ 47,531 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.703%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
110
of 202 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views â note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramâs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 102 of 110 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held
202 (10 August 2026 â 15 September 2026)
Views total
184,576
Reactions total
1,244
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface â not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than âcorrectingâ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form â 8.12K, 3.7M â so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded â read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
â14,500
Videos
â885
Links
â4,200
Lifetime counters from Telegramâs own channel header, read 15 September 2026 â not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel â not this channelâs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramâs own rounded chrome, so it carries no â mark.
Reaction mix
2,847 reactions across 193 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
â€
1,733
60.9%
ð¥°
205
7.20%
ð
168
5.90%
ð
160
5.62%
ð
158
5.55%
ð
154
5.41%
â¡
94
3.30%
ð¯
74
2.60%
ð
64
2.25%
ð€£
22
0.773%
ð
11
0.386%
ð
4
0.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities â ð is thanks in one channel and mourning in another â so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one â 4.34K, 1.2M â so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 194 of the 202 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramâs own count on each post â not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above â those same posts carry 2,847 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by âa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageâ.
Measured over the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Showing the 12 most recent of 202 posts we hold for @ULTRAPRONOSWIN77CAP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked â was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it â t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so â1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ULTRAPRONOSWIN77CAP edited 1 post after it first published â the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too â this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel â every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched â that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayâs namer to yesterdayâs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason â naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides â the âNamed by N registered channelsâ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramâs own answer, not this registerâs. When this register asks Telegramâs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it â never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramâs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
âŠïžðšðð§ð¥ð ð£ð¥ð¢ð¡ð¢ðŠðªðð¡âŠïž @ULTRA_PRONOSWIN · 349,628 (as read 28 August 2026)#1
Read from Telegramâs recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register â how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramâs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly â each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseâs query is independent of having been queried itself.
ð Pronostics Football 365 ð«ð· @pronostics_football_365 · 90,401 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 76 here â alongside 75 others â read 17 August 2026
â€ïžâš ðððð ðð âšâ€ïž @RYUKPRONOO1 · 116,190 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 55 here â alongside 54 others â read 3 September 2026
ð¥ð«ð· ððððð || ðððððð ð«ð·ð¥ @xbetcouponsgratuitt · 163,929 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 69 here â alongside 68 others â read 12 August 2026
ð°ðð¢ð¡ðð§ððð¡ ð£ð¥ð¢ð¡ð¢ðŠð° @jonathanpronos1 · 138,976 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 56 here â alongside 55 others â read 13 August 2026
âïž V I K E E âïž @vikeeprono6 · 180,989 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 70 here â alongside 69 others â read 12 August 2026
ððð¬ððð§ ðšðð§ð¥ð ð£ð¥ð¢ð¡ð¢ @KAYBET_ULTRA_PRONO · 122,459 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here â alongside 69 others â read 13 August 2026
King Fury Pro ð¯ @KingFuryPronos · 135,348 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 73 here â alongside 72 others â read 13 August 2026
âšâ€ïž ððð¥ð¥ðð¡ð â€ïžâš @ferrandprono7 · 327,985 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here â alongside 68 others â read 12 August 2026
AKIRA @akirajohnstone223 · 246,208 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here â alongside 64 others â read 12 August 2026
ððð ðððððð ððððð @lucluther1DK10 · 293,201 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 62 here â alongside 61 others â read 12 August 2026
âŠïž âš ððð ððððð ððð âš âŠïž @betfixedvibes · 24,794 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 66 here â alongside 65 others â read 15 September 2026
àŒðªð¢ð¡ððð¥âð£ð¥ð¢ð¡ð¢àŒ @wonder_pronostics · 60,813 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 67 here â alongside 66 others â read 28 August 2026
NIMPAZOR PRONO @nimpazorprono · 151,073 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here â alongside 68 others â read 13 August 2026
ðïžðððð ðððððððïž @LionelPcs110 · 85,445 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here â alongside 60 others â read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramâs list for THAT channel, not this one â see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 â this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ââŠïžðšðð§ð¥ð ð£ð¥ð¢ð¡ð¢ðŠðªðð¡âŠïžâ (@ULTRAPRONOSWIN77CAP), 47,531 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ULTRAPRONOSWIN77CAP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.