Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

UFC Live🔥

@UFClive_en

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69,704subscribers

-388 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232848471
TypeChannel
Username@UFClive_en
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UFClive_en

Growth

69,61570,09269,853.57 August 2026 — 70,092 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,092 subscribers8 August 2026 — 70,000 subscribers9 August 2026 — 69,960 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69,842 subscribers11 August 2026 — 69,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 69,689 subscribers14 August 2026 — 69,615 subscribers15 August 2026 — 69,704 subscribers69,7047 August 202615 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -388. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,543–70,164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:2369,704+89
14 Aug 2026, 01:4569,615-74
12 Aug 2026, 19:4369,689-54
11 Aug 2026, 20:1269,743-99
10 Aug 2026, 19:3169,842-118
9 Aug 2026, 16:0269,960-40
8 Aug 2026, 14:2770,000-92
7 Aug 2026, 15:0070,092no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:5170,092first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.95%
avg views ÷ 69,704 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.307%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held49 (2 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total66,770
Reactions total182
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 42 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13272.5%
👍126.59%
🔥105.49%
🥱84.40%
💯52.75%
🤔52.75%
👀42.20%
👏31.65%
🦄21.10%
🤣10.549%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Machado Garry challenges for the welterweight title against Islam Makhachev at UFC 330. Machado Garry enters UFC 330 as a +270 underdog for a welterweight title shot against champion Islam Makhachev. He arrives with a 17-1 record, coming off a win over former champ Belal Muhammad after his only loss to Shavkat Rakhmonov. A victory would make him the second UFC champion from Ireland and interrupt Makhachev's 16-fig

4

14 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Gastelum out, Djorden Santos steps in to face Yousri Belgaroui at Noche UFC. Kelvin Gastelum has withdrawn from his middleweight fight against Yousri Belgaroui for undisclosed reasons. Brazilian Djorden Santos will instead face Belgaroui on short notice at Noche UFC on Sept. 12 in Glendale. Belgaroui, known for his striking and training with Glover Teixeira and Alex Pereira, keeps his spot on the card. 📖Read in f

2

14 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,270 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Unbeaten Anthony Wint gets UFC debut just weeks after 34-second DWCS knockout Unbeaten heavyweight Anthony Wint will face Terrance Chatman at UFC Sacramento on Aug. 22. Wint earned his UFC contract with a 34-second knockout of Matthew Adams on Dana White's Contender Series. The rapid booking gives him a direct transition from his DWCS headliner victory. 📖Read in full #AnthonyWint #UFC #UFCsacramento

4

14 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,360 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Neil Magny sees Garry as a real threat, says first round could shake up UFC 330 odds Neil Magny, who lost to Ian Machado Garry in 2023, believes the challenger can make the welterweight title fight competitive early. He pointed to Garry's striking, movement, range, and underused ground game as potential paths to an upset. Magny expects the public perception of the fight to shift drastically if the opening round is

7🔥2🥱1

14 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC≈1,480 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Makhachev questions Topuria's focus after Gaethje loss, points to pre-fight celebration Islam Makhachev has questioned whether Ilia Topuria's confidence became overconfidence before his loss to Justin Gaethje. He specifically pointed to a video of an elaborate pre-fight celebration as possible evidence Topuria underestimated his opponent. The loss cost Topuria the lightweight title and ended his 18-fight unbeaten

5

13 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 15 August 2026

❗️Khabib reveals McGregor feud was his 'toughest mental fight,' citing personal insults and unprecedented hype. Khabib Nurmagomedov said Conor McGregor was his hardest mental test at the time of their UFC 229 bout. He cited the intense personal feud, involving family and religion, as the primary burden. He later said his retirement fight against Justin Gaethje, following his father's death, became an even greater ch

13 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Joe Rogan challenges Aljamain Sterling over his habit of drinking one or two glasses the night before a fight. Sterling told Rogan on his podcast that he sometimes has a drink before competing, a practice he knows is unusual. Rogan pressed him, asking if even a small difference in rest could matter in an extremely close fight. Sterling defended his routine, saying pre-fight naps recharge him and that if he loses o

2

13 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,220 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Ian Machado Garry questions Islam Makhachev's 'puffed up' shoes at UFC 330 face-off. Ian Machado Garry questioned Islam Makhachev's footwear at their first UFC 330 face-off in Philadelphia. Garry accused the welterweight champion of potentially wearing heels, an observation fueled by Garry not appearing to tower over Makhachev as expected. The footwear angle is part of the pre-fight discussion for Saturday's UFC 3

4🦄1

13 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC≈1,280 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Islam Makhachev felt bad after hearing Demetrious Johnson never got a $1M UFC payday Islam Makhachev expressed surprise and sympathy when Demetrious Johnson revealed he never received a $1 million paycheck for a UFC fight. Makhachev stated fighter pay has changed and 'they pay more now.' The exchange happened during an interview ahead of Makhachev's UFC 330 bout against Ian Machado Garry. 📖Read in full #IslamMak

👀4

13 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 15 August 2026

❗️Islam Makhachev's only UFC loss was a brutal counter right from Adriano Martins at UFC 192. Islam Makhachev's sole UFC defeat remains his 2015 knockout loss to Adriano Martins. The counter right hand put Makhachev 'almost to sleep' on the UFC 192 prelims. Makhachev now enters UFC 330 to defend his welterweight title after a record-setting lightweight run. 📖Read in full #IslamMakhachev #AdrianoMartins #UFC330

12 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 15 August 2026

❗️Uros Medic eyes November or December return after arthroscopic knee surgery Uros Medic expects about a month of recovery after an arthroscopic procedure on his meniscus tear. He hopes to fight again before the end of the year, targeting a November or December return window. The Serbian welterweight earned a 30-second knockout over Daniel Rodriguez in Belgrade while carrying the injury. 📖Read in full #UrosMedic #

12 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,190 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

❗️Stephen Thompson targets Madison Square Garden on Nov. 14 for final UFC contract fight Stephen Thompson has one fight left on his current UFC deal and is in talks to compete at Madison Square Garden on November 14. The welterweight stated his desire for a 'barn burner' of a matchup, though an opponent has not been identified. Thompson described New York as a 'home away from home' and is pursuing a stylistically en

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @UFClive_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 80,496 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UFC Live🔥” (@UFClive_en), 69,704 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UFClive_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.