Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UFC Live🔥

Channel

UFC Live🔥

@UFClive_en

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

69,547subscribers

-545 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002232848471
TypeChannel
Username@UFClive_en
DescriptionThe Best UFC Telegram 🐐 Our website: ufc.website.yandexcloud.net 🥊 No Holds Barred Fights | Expert Predictions | Inside the Octagon For questions about content or advertising removal, please write to us @vpesportscom
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UFClive_en

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

69,37071,01570,192.57 August 2026 — 70,092 subscribers7 August 2026 — 70,092 subscribers8 August 2026 — 70,000 subscribers9 August 2026 — 69,960 subscribers10 August 2026 — 69,842 subscribers11 August 2026 — 69,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 69,689 subscribers14 August 2026 — 69,615 subscribers15 August 2026 — 69,704 subscribers16 August 2026 — 71,015 subscribers18 August 2026 — 70,860 subscribers19 August 2026 — 70,743 subscribers20 August 2026 — 70,629 subscribers21 August 2026 — 70,582 subscribers22 August 2026 — 70,444 subscribers24 August 2026 — 70,280 subscribers25 August 2026 — 70,178 subscribers26 August 2026 — 70,083 subscribers27 August 2026 — 70,012 subscribers28 August 2026 — 69,926 subscribers29 August 2026 — 69,886 subscribers30 August 2026 — 69,932 subscribers31 August 2026 — 69,838 subscribers1 September 2026 — 69,744 subscribers2 September 2026 — 69,663 subscribers3 September 2026 — 69,557 subscribers5 September 2026 — 69,817 subscribers9 September 2026 — 69,798 subscribers11 September 2026 — 69,592 subscribers13 September 2026 — 69,768 subscribers15 September 2026 — 69,610 subscribers17 September 2026 — 69,473 subscribers19 September 2026 — 69,370 subscribers26 September 2026 — 69,547 subscribers69,5477 August 202626 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -545. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,123–71,262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 07:3869,547+177
19 Sept 2026, 13:3669,370-103
17 Sept 2026, 04:3869,473-137
15 Sept 2026, 02:1969,610-158
13 Sept 2026, 12:3969,768+176
11 Sept 2026, 18:3669,592-206
9 Sept 2026, 04:1569,798-19
5 Sept 2026, 19:1869,817+260
3 Sept 2026, 17:0069,557-106
2 Sept 2026, 09:3469,663-81
1 Sept 2026, 06:0469,744-94
31 Aug 2026, 05:4469,838-94
30 Aug 2026, 03:4769,932+46
29 Aug 2026, 03:2569,886-40
28 Aug 2026, 04:3769,926-86
27 Aug 2026, 03:1370,012-71
26 Aug 2026, 05:4670,083-95
25 Aug 2026, 04:4470,178-102
24 Aug 2026, 04:0470,280-164
22 Aug 2026, 11:2470,444first reading

Engagement

211 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.52%
avg views ÷ 69,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,760
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.181%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
108
of 211 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 81 of 108 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held211 (2 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total189,594
Reactions total277
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈364
Links
≈1,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

617 reactions across 160 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤43370.2%
🔥264.21%
👍233.73%
💯213.40%
🥱182.92%
😁162.59%
🏆81.30%
👏81.30%
💔81.30%
🤣81.30%
🥴81.30%
🤔71.13%
👀40.648%
🦄40.648%
🐳30.486%
🤪30.486%
🥰30.486%
🫡30.486%
🙏20.324%
🤬20.324%
7 further kinds91.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 211 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 617 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 211 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 15:27 UTC210 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Delta Center Hosts UFC 332 on October 3 Delta Center hosts UFC 332 on October 3, with Jacobe Smith vs. UFC newcomer Bruce Whitehead added to the card. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/delta-center-hosts-ufc-332-on-october-3/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

29 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC401 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Amanda Nunes Mocks UFC Vegas 121 Bout Amanda Nunes mocked Norma Dumont and Ailin Perez after their UFC Vegas 121 co-main event, won by Perez via unanimous decision. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/amanda-nunes-mocks-ufc-vegas-121-bout/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

28 Sept 2026, 23:30 UTC830 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Justin Gaethje Explains His MMA Top Five Justin Gaethje named five MMA greats on his personal Mount Rushmore and left Khabib Nurmagomedov off the list. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/justin-gaethje-explains-his-mma-top-five/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

👍1

28 Sept 2026, 21:30 UTC824 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Elves Brener Calls for Michael Johnson After knocking out Josiah Harrell at UFC Vegas 121, Elves Brener named Michael Johnson as his preferred lightweight opponent for December. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/elves-brener-calls-for-michael-johnson/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

28 Sept 2026, 19:30 UTC794 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Dana White Contender Series Week 8 Dana White Contender Series Season 10 reaches Week 8 with five bouts in Las Vegas and 34 contracts awarded through seven weeks. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/dana-white-contender-series-week-8/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

28 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC816 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Darren Till Says UFC Title Dream Still Stings Darren Till says missing out on a UFC title remains a lasting regret while he considers bare-knuckle, boxing and other options after BKFC 94. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/darren-till-says-ufc-title-dream-still-stings/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

28 Sept 2026, 15:18 UTC806 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Aaron Pico Details UFC 333 Changes Aaron Pico discusses the Sterling and Arnold Allen fights that fell through before his UFC 333 bout with Losene Keita. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/aaron-pico-details-ufc-333-changes/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

28 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC832 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Zaynukov Shuts Down UFC Qatar Rumors Zaynukov says he did not sign to fight at UFC Qatar and will spend the rest of 2026 recovering from surgery. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/zaynukov-shuts-down-ufc-qatar-rumors/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

28 Sept 2026, 00:16 UTC≈1,040 views1 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Luis Hernandez Wins UFC Debut in 50 Seconds Luis Hernandez submitted Sedriques Dumas with a guillotine choke in 50 seconds after accepting a UFC Vegas 121 fight on two days’ notice. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/luis-hernandez-wins-ufc-debut-in-50-seconds/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

😁1

28 Sept 2026, 00:15 UTC938 views3 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Raoni Barcelos Awake After UFC Vegas 121 Raoni Barcelos is reported awake and partially moving in hospital after the UFC Vegas 121 main event earned Fight of the Night. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/raoni-barcelos-awake-after-ufc-vegas-121/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

❤3

27 Sept 2026, 18:17 UTC921 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Islam Makhachev Draws Top-Three Praise Islam Makhachev was placed in Diana Belbita’s all-time top three or top five after his title success and 17-match winning streak. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/islam-makhachev-draws-top-three-praise/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

27 Sept 2026, 18:17 UTC843 viewsread 29 September 2026
Photo

Raoni Barcelos Awake After UFC Vegas 121 Raoni Barcelos is reported awake and partially moving in hospital after the UFC Vegas 121 main event earned Fight of the Night. 🔗 https://ufc.website.yandexcloud.net/raoni-barcelos-awake-after-ufc-vegas-121/ #UFC #MMA #VPEsports

Showing the 12 most recent of 211 posts we hold for @UFClive_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UFC Live🔥” (@UFClive_en), 69,547 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UFClive_en.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.