12 measurements spanning 17 days, net -52,682. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 19:38
2
+1
16 Aug 2026, 08:54
1
-52,463
14 Aug 2026, 20:24
52,464
-37
13 Aug 2026, 11:23
52,501
-31
12 Aug 2026, 13:55
52,532
-27
11 Aug 2026, 15:54
52,559
-36
10 Aug 2026, 14:25
52,595
-19
9 Aug 2026, 15:11
52,614
-36
8 Aug 2026, 15:41
52,650
-27
7 Aug 2026, 13:45
52,677
-7
7 Aug 2026, 04:45
52,684
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:37
52,684
first reading
Engagement
72 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
398541.7%
avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,970
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 72 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
72 (3 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
573,900
Reactions total
8,794
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,794 reactions across 72 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,230
25.4%
👍
1,332
15.1%
🔥
1,140
13.0%
🤣
965
11.0%
🤡
956
10.9%
😁
859
9.77%
👏
394
4.48%
💯
146
1.66%
🤝
136
1.55%
👎
110
1.25%
🕊
90
1.02%
❤🔥
66
0.751%
🏆
57
0.648%
🤯
41
0.466%
✍
38
0.432%
🥰
35
0.398%
⚡
33
0.375%
💩
33
0.375%
🙏
25
0.284%
😭
19
0.216%
20 further kinds
89
1.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 72 of the 72 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,794reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 72 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 72 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UFC_BELGRADE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 72 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔥Иэн Гарри пытался залезть в голову Махачеву
🇮🇪💬Что сказал Гарри:
«Вот и всё, брат. Всё поставлено на карту. Все рекорды, всё. Ты готов? Самый большой бой».
🇷🇺💬 Махачев:
«Не самый большой».
🇮🇪💬 Гарри:
«Да, но всё, чего ты достиг, на кону. Всё, что ты можешь потерять. Всё можно потерять, всё можно выиграть»
🔥Дана Уайт уверен, что Хабиб мог стать величайшим бойцом в истории.
💬Ислам достиг большего, чем Хабиб, потому что бился дольше. Кто знает, чего Хабиб мог бы достичь, если бы продолжил карьеру… Если бы Хабиб сделал то, на что он, как мы все знаем, был способен, то он определенно стал бы величайшим бойцом всех времен.
🔥Майкл Моралес рассказал, что для страховки боя на турнире #UFC330 ему пришлось сбросить около 27 кг.
🇪🇨💬С почти 104-х кг до 77, все ради рекорда Гиннеса. Всегда, когда я страхующий или у меня назначен бой - я готов, чтобы ни произошло. Если подерусь отлично. Если нет - без проблем, продолжим ждать.
🔥Хабиб раскритиковал Ислама Махачева за резкие слова в сторону Иэна Гэрри:
💬«Брат, я год оплачивал им учителя по английскому, они ничего не выучили. Иэн Гэрри говорил о нем очень любезно, а он ему: «Заткнись». Брат, будь любезен»
⚡UFC 330: Махачев vs Иэн Гэрри!⚡
👍Чуть больше суток осталось до боя между Исламом Махачевым и ирландским атлетом Иеном Гэрри в Филадельфии!
Сможет ли наш боец защитить свой титул в среднем весе? Что подсказывает тебе чутье?
➡️Составляй экспресс из трёх и более событий на игру!
💸Ты получишь приветственный бонус к выигрышу до 100%
🔥Смотри ГЛАВНЫЙ бой турнира и делай его ещё жарче вместе с VAVADA!
🔥Александр Волкановски выложил у себя на странице видео у печки и подписал: «В своем следующем видео на YouTube я приготовлю то, что будет написано в топ-комментарии под этим постом»
и самый залайканый комментарий оказался Мовсар Евлоев 😅
🔥Конор Макгрегор:
💬"Это потрясающий бой. Конечно, я ставлю на Иена Гэрри. И я действительно верю, что он сможет это сделать. Уверен, он сможет. Как бы это сказать...В общем, правый хай-кик. Прямо в голову. Поздний раунд. Это будет поздний раунд, ребята. И победа ирландско-бразильского бойца. Вперед, Иен"
🔥Ислам Махачев мечтает завершить карьеру в России
🇷🇺💬«Я бы хотел провести бой в России. Потому что это моя страна, и меня все там поддерживают. Все хотят снова увидеть мой бой в России, вот почему я хочу именно там завершить свою карьеру – положить перчатки в центре октагона в Москве. Если говорить о боях, это для меня лучшее место. Надеюсь, скоро UFC вернётся в Россию».
🔥Даррен Тилл вырубил возле бара бойца BKFC Ли Брауна за то, что тот многое себе позволял писать в интернете в его адрес.
👍68❤10😁6👏5🤡3🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 72 posts we hold for @UFC_BELGRADE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ufc_belgrade” (@UFC_BELGRADE), 2 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UFC_BELGRADE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.