Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

悦悦的花园

@Tyuecomboth

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

895subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003520246938
TypeChannel
Username@Tyuecomboth
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tyuecomboth

Growth

888895891.59 Aug 2026, 11:30 — 888 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 11:31 — 888 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:16 — 895 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 11:309 Aug 2026, 15:16
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 887–896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 15:16895+7
9 Aug 2026, 11:31888no change
9 Aug 2026, 11:30888first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.19%
avg views ÷ 895 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (13 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total220
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jun 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,560 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @wuhanhua2

【验证留名】匿名 【验证时间】2026年 6月 18日 【老师花名】冰柠 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/14832 【卫生环境】不错 【所在位置】光谷 【修车水费】6p 【服务内容】鸳鸯浴,水中萧,情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有) 【服务过程】探花完毕,是最近日的印象比较深刻的妹妹了有点夯,课室在光谷。约上头课来晚了也不生气态度很好,进门就揉奶抹穴调情氛围感舒适,人照9左右本人高挑身材火辣极致任盘类型,聊天打开话匣子就比较轻松些有点闷骚类型,主动培浴上床开整,抱着亲亲舔舔伺候个遍随便玩也不催,👅爽了自动喊爸爸,嗲里嗲气的受不了额😭,感觉鸡儿要快硬到爆炸了,受不了就让她开始给我口,豪无齿感顶到最深,边按头插嘴边摸她的骚逼淫水泛滥🤡,感觉都快要发射了及时喊停,带上🌂就进入小穴了,很烫很紧很润😂,本打算大战三百回合结果tm才两个姿势就顶不住被秒了……,事后还意犹未尽,尤其后入腰完全趴下去,边日边

4

18 Jun 2026, 06:07 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @wuhanhua2

【验证留名】匿名 【验证时间】2026 年 6 月 17日 【老师花名】冰柠 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/14832 【卫生环境】干净,一次性用品 【所在位置】光谷 【修车水费】6p 【服务内容】 鸳鸯浴,水中萧,情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有) 【服务过程]完全人照一致,本人好看一点听声音是我喜欢的类型,跟照片匹配,应该是人照基本一致的。老师很甜,进门聊了一会天,就开始各种挑逗我,身材很棒,胸饱满目测应该是c,然后就是帮我脱,去洗澡。该有的服务都有。总的来说物超所值。 【优点缺点】无敌嫩妹 【机车行为】无 【推荐程度】9.5分(10分最高,最好不要10分) 【报告频道】https://t.me/wuhanhua2 【所在群组】https://t.me/wuhanlou 【聊天吹水】https://t.me/whlou6

17 Jun 2026, 10:06 UTC931 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @wuhanhua2

【验证留名】可匿名不写 【验证时间】2026 年 6月 17日 【老师花名】冰柠 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/14832 【卫生环境】干净整洁 【所在位置】光谷 【修车水费】12p 【服务内容】例子: 鸳鸯浴,水中萧,情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有) 【服务过程】整体感受就是依旧很嫩很喜欢,笑起来非常可爱,女友感十足,对我来说最大的感受是从123变成了小小桩机一枚。入门付完水费后洗澡,然后ls开始服务,舔胸很舒服,然后按耐不住心火翻身将老师按至身下,开始轻🐍,ls的胸非常好看,爆满圆润,前戏过后提枪上马,一水草草了事。二水就是我大展神威的时候了,本123冲击了有个十分钟吧,没有刻意不射,但居然发挥意外的好,老师下面水也很足,日感极佳,最后实在射不出来,套子都掉了,在老师的亲吻挑逗之下自己打出,感觉非常好,就是谈恋爱的感觉。 【优点缺点】服务态度特别好 本人比照片好看 【机车行为】无 【推

1

16 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC766 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @wuhanhua2

【验证留名】可匿名不写 【验证时间】2026 年 6月 16日 【老师花名】冰柠 【联系方式】https://t.me/wuhanhua1/14832 【卫生环境】干净整洁 【所在位置】光谷 【修车水费】6p 【服务内容】鸳鸯浴,水中萧,情趣调情,69,🐍,各种姿势,课表内容都有) 【服务过程】刚打开门,领我进去,然后简单聊了个天,在脱衣洗澡,看到她慢慢褪下的衣服,露出绝美的酮体的时候,我立马硬了,在洗澡时也抚摸我的下面,洗完澡后在床上给我口了一会儿,口的特别舒服,口完后戴上tt,就开始了类似情侣间的爱爱,给了我女朋友般的感觉,两颗大雷在面前晃来晃去,看得我眼冒金光,c的时候也特别的舒服,最后做的满头大汗,在临走时又给了我女朋友般的拥抱,一切都特别的美好,可惜,美好的时光总是短暂的,下回还找她 【优点缺点】服务态度特别好,长得特别好看是她最大的缺点,因为她美到我了 【机车行为】无 【推荐程度】9.5分(10分最高,最好不要10分

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tyuecomboth. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 693,413 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“悦悦的花园” (@Tyuecomboth), 895 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tyuecomboth.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.