Я так Рада что хоть какой-то актив, вы очень сильно настроение поднимаете🥹

Channel
» A𝗥T 𝗚𝗚 @𝗻j
@TypeOfArt88
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003898583554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TypeOfArt88 |
| Description | A𝗥T :: Á𝖯𝖳 헐적 START : 𝟮𝟯.O𝟮.𝟮𝟲. https://t.me/SeraphicPort — оформление 링크 NJ : : proto & ready 5 / ׅ𝟱 связь @TypeOfArtHelp_bot » TT :: @type_ofart88 ㅤ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TypeOfArt88 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:49 | 26 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 26 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 139.4%
- avg views ÷ 26 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 36.3
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (7 March 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 145 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 08:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 14
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
205 reactions across 7 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5215367139581523866 | 37 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5318796742412495636 | 31 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5258477354124081646 | 30 | 14.6% | |
| custom 5258100930305357748 | 21 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5253563013889288209 | 20 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5215673546843383603 | 17 | 8.29% | |
| custom 5355210583249546303 | 12 | 5.85% | |
| custom 5384212702103105131 | 9 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5427084391341905255 | 9 | 4.39% | |
| custom 5215693514146342362 | 6 | 2.93% | |
| custom 5294481347706905801 | 6 | 2.93% | |
| custom 5256176578798312472 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| custom 5258093723350234282 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| custom 5440458206537065468 | 1 | 0.488% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TypeOfArt88. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 March 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Я думала, просто я так хотела все продвигать и поддерживать девочек, и теперь у меня есть возможность это делать и не хотелось бы терять ни кого😔
Как думаете?
- Даа и лучше с новым составом50%
- Даа но с этим же составом30%
- Нет, не стоит30%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Стоит возвращать?😔
Sticker, posted without a caption
🍭 » 𝗔R𝗧 G𝗚 @🤩 n𝗷 ! . ➖Y pre𝘁𝘁y G𝗜RL » 🗒️ ᥰ᧐ᤋдρᥲʙ᧘яᥱⲙ нᥲɯу ᧘юδᥙⲙую ᥲ᧘ᥙρу ᥴ днᥱⲙ ρ᧐ждᥱнᥙя!! ⊹ ➿➖➿ · ➖ · ➿➖➿ HlMKA » Алира, поздравляю тебя с днём рождения. Ты наша будущая звездочка, сияй ещё ярче чем сейчас и будь с нами долго! JULlE » Алира, с днём рождения!! Желаю тебе, чтобы этот день был наполнен теплом, улыбками и самыми искренними моментами. Пусть все хорошее только начинается. Надеюсь, ты тоже пров…
custom 52584773541240816467custom 52535630138892882096custom 53552105832495463035custom 52581009303053577484custom 52944813477069058012custom 53187967424124956362custom 52153671395815238661custom 53842127021031051311
Sticker, posted without a caption
ⲔА𐋏ДⳘДАⲦЫ – » раф гвен ами аса милис порядок расставленние имён не имеет ни какого значения!! в этом списке находятся те девочки у которых был хороший шанс попасть в группу 🤍 просьба не отписываться ведь в будущем будет очень много нового!
custom 52153671395815238665custom 53187967424124956365custom 52156735468433836033custom 52535630138892882092custom 52581009303053577482custom 52580937233502342821custom 53552105832495463031
Sticker, posted without a caption
🍭 » 𝗔R𝗧 G𝗚 @🤩 n𝗷 ! . ➖Y pre𝘁𝘁y G𝗜RL » 🗒️ ʙ чᥱᥴᴛь 8 mᥲρᴛᥲ учᥲᥴᴛнᥙцы ρᥱɯᥙ᧘ᥙ ᥰ᧐ᤋдρᥲʙᥙᴛь нᥲɯᥙ᥊ ᥲρᴛᥙκ᧐ʙ ᥴ ϶ᴛᥙⲙ ᤋᥲⲙᥱчᥲᴛᥱ᧘ьныⲙ ᥰρᥲᤋднᥙκ᧐ⲙ!! 😀 ⊹ ➿➖➿ · ➖ · ➿ ➖➿ HI𝗠KA » Дорогие девушки, поздравляю вас с 8 мартом, с праздником который от и до посвящен вам. Желаю что бы этот день вы правели как королевы, да и не только этот день, всю жизнь 𝗝UL𝗜E » С днем борьбы за права женщин и социальное равенство, прекрасные!! Ж…
custom 531879674241249563610custom 52153671395815238668custom 52535630138892882096custom 53842127021031051313custom 52580937233502342822custom 54270843913419052552custom 52156735468433836031custom 52156935141463423621
Sticker, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
custom 52153671395815238669custom 52581009303053577487custom 52584773541240816464custom 52156735468433836032custom 52156935141463423622custom 52535630138892882092custom 53187967424124956362custom 52944813477069058011
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @TypeOfArt88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете?
- Даа и лучше с новым составом50%
- Даа но с этим же составом30%
- Нет, не стоит30%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,313,494 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“» A𝗥T 𝗚𝗚 @𝗻j” (@TypeOfArt88), 26 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TypeOfArt88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.