Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🎩

Channel

🎩

@TylerFansir

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,115subscribers

-181 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002162358119
TypeChannel
Username@TylerFansir
Created1 July 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TylerFansir

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,11515,29615,205.523 August 2026 — 15,296 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,296 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,288 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,270 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,265 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,260 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,247 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,223 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,211 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,196 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,192 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,180 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,167 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,140 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,115 subscribers23 August 202611 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 18 days, net -181. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,088–15,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 05:2215,115-25
8 Sept 2026, 08:5415,140-27
5 Sept 2026, 03:1515,167-13
3 Sept 2026, 10:2515,180-12
2 Sept 2026, 05:1315,192-4
1 Sept 2026, 03:1515,196-15
31 Aug 2026, 03:2415,211-12
30 Aug 2026, 00:3515,223-24
29 Aug 2026, 00:5815,247-13
28 Aug 2026, 00:1715,260-5
26 Aug 2026, 22:0815,265-5
25 Aug 2026, 21:2315,270-18
25 Aug 2026, 00:1415,288-8
23 Aug 2026, 19:0015,296no change
23 Aug 2026, 18:4515,296first reading

Engagement

2 posts held, back to 1 July 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 2 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 1 post, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥444.4%
🐳333.3%
🎃111.1%
👍111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 2 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 2 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2024 to 24 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2025, 14:23 UTC≈2,360 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎁 اگه به فضای گیفت های تلگرامی علاقه مند هستید میتونید اینجا عضو بشید😎 خرید گیفت های خام که توسط تلگرام منتشر میشن میتونه خیلی سودآور باشه.. بزرگترین گروه چت گیفت هم اینجاست 🙂

🔥4🐳3🎃1👍1

Showing the 2 most recent of 2 posts we hold for @TylerFansir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ʙʟᴜᴍ | فارسی | ᴍᴀᴊᴏʀ
@Blumeparsi · 38,103
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
Crypto News
@Crypto1Parsi · 54,552
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 23 August 2026
گروه رژيم درمانی بهاره غفاری
@ghafaridietchanel · 29,162
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🎩” (@TylerFansir), 15,115 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TylerFansir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.