هرکی هم استیکر نمیخواد بذاره این استیکر😈
😈17
Signed sajjad

Channel
@Tweetbadnews
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,678subscribers
-144 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001180894474 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Tweetbadnews |
| Created | 18 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Tweetbadnews |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:41 | 2,678 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 2,680 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:07 | 2,682 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:44 | 2,688 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:30 | 2,694 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:28 | 2,700 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 2,704 | -7 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:09 | 2,711 | -8 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:58 | 2,719 | -10 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 2,729 | -16 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 2,745 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 2,754 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 2,756 | -10 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 2,766 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:04 | 2,771 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 2,775 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 2,784 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 2,785 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 2,794 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 2,802 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
482 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 164 | 34.0% | |
| 💔 | 86 | 17.8% | |
| 👍 | 63 | 13.1% | |
| 🤣 | 56 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 6.22% | |
| 😭 | 27 | 5.60% | |
| 😈 | 21 | 4.36% | |
| 🗿 | 18 | 3.73% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 0.622% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.622% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.622% | |
| 😇 | 2 | 0.415% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.415% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.207% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.207% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.207% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 0.207% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 482 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2023 to 26 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هرکی هم استیکر نمیخواد بذاره این استیکر😈
😈17
Signed sajjad
رئالی ها این استیکر🔥 اونایی هم که طرفدار این دوتا تیم نیستن این استیکر🤗
🔥15🤗3
Signed sajjad
رفیقای بارسایی دوستون دارم🫶🏻 ولی بارسایی حالت چطوره😁 عالیم این استیکر🤣 خوبم این استیکر😢 خیلی بد😭
🤣9😢1😭1
Signed sajjad
من هنوز زنده ام😂😂 #sajjad
🗿6❤3😭3🌚1🕊1🤣1
Signed sajjad
صبور باشین خبرهای خوشحال کنندهای توی راهه❤️ #sajjad
❤10🔥1
Signed sajjad
همه منتظرن❗️
👍12
یه خبر خوب دارم یه خبر بد کدومشو زود تر بگم😁😱
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed sajjad
سلام رفقا نه بهتره بگم خانواده توییت بد نیوز باعث افتخارمه با اینکه این همه مدت نبودم و پست نذاشتم بازم کنار ما بودین ممنونم از وفاداری تک❤️ تکتون رفیقتون. #sajjad
❤9🔥1🙈1
Signed sajjad
هر لینکی از اینستاگرام بهش بدین براتون دانلود میکنه پروفایل پیج هم حتی دانلود میکنه کافیه فقط ایدی پیجو برای دانلود پروفایل بهش بدین مثال: @instagram (پروفایل این پیج تو اینستاگرام دانلود میشه)
🗿1
Signed #Esi (اسی)
رفقا از ربات دانلودر اینستاگراممون استفاده کنید رایگان با سرعت بالا بدون قطعی @Rapkinginstagram_bot
Signed #Esi (اسی)
اولین صحبت توماج بعد آزادی : فک میکردم غمگین ترین موقعیت یه آدم تنها بودن زیر شکنجه های زمان بازدداشته حالا میفهمم تنهایی آزاد شدن از اون هم تلخ تره.... @TweetBadNews #sajjad
💔86🤣6👍3❤1
Signed sajjad
اولین عکس توماج بعد از آزادیییی @TweetBadNews #sajjad
❤72❤🔥3👎3🔥1🤣1
Signed sajjad
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Tweetbadnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه خبر خوب دارم یه خبر بد کدومشو زود تر بگم😁😱
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2023 to 26 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tweet Bad News” (@Tweetbadnews), 2,678 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tweetbadnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.