Channel
Turnip Project助手
@TurnipProject
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,565subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002016706278 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TurnipProject |
| Description | 有问题可私聊 @LittleTurnipBot |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TurnipProject |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 1,565 | no change |
| 25 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 1,565 | -4 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 1,569 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 1,572 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 1,575 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AptvPlayerChannel · 33,904
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 5 September 2026
@tossichannel · 33,268
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 5 September 2026
@odysseyplus · 24,933
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 15 September 2026
@rocCHL · 36,054
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 3 September 2026
@jianjiaoPD · 125,239
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 4 September 2026
@LoonNews · 46,023
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 27 August 2026
@TestFlightX · 44,277
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Turnip Project助手” (@TurnipProject), 1,565 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TurnipProject.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.