Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Tulsi Gabbard 🌺

@TulsiGabbard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,548subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001636424123
TypeChannel
Username@TulsiGabbard
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TulsiGabbard

Growth

1,5481,5561,5526 August 2026 — 1,556 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,556 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,550 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,548 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,547–1,557 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:251,548-2
9 Aug 2026, 18:411,550-6
6 Aug 2026, 07:341,556no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:241,556first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35m 13s
Average length
2m 43s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,493 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
69246.3%
🙏33722.6%
👍24916.7%
😭503.35%
❤‍🔥483.22%
👏382.55%
🔥181.21%
🥰140.938%
🤔110.737%
👎90.603%
💯80.536%
🫡60.402%
😘50.335%
🕊30.201%
😢30.201%
🍌10.067%
💩10.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,493reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC815 views94 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

250 years ago our founders enshrined the fundamental truth that “all men are created equal, endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable rights, among those, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” as the bedrock of our nation. It's up to us to uphold our God-given freedoms, and to stand firm against those who seek to undermine them. Have a safe and happy Independence Day! 🇺🇸 @TulsiGabbard

64👏13👍8💯8🫡1

2 Jun 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,530 views152 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

We are getting ready to head to the hospital for my husband’s surgery and just wanted to say thank you so much to all of who have shared messages, prayers and well wishes for Abraham. We are humbled and so grateful to be surrounded by aloha during this really tough time. 🙏🏽 @TulsiGabbard

🙏8057👍10🕊3😘2

25 May 2026, 19:51 UTC≈1,380 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

On this Memorial Day, my heart feels heavy as I remember my brothers and sisters I served with who never made it home. We honor their ultimate sacrifice by standing up for the principles that unite us as Americans, defending our God-given freedoms, treating one another with aloha—respecting each other as children of God—and always striving for peace. Never forget. 🇺🇸 @TulsiGabbard

63👍6

22 May 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,940 views107 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Today, with great humility and sincere appreciation, I shared the below letter with President Trump. It has been a profound honor to serve the American people as DNI. @TulsiGabbard

😭38🙏3231😢3🤔2🔥1

11 May 2026, 20:26 UTC≈1,450 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026

DNI Tulsi Gabbard probes US funding to more than 120 biolabs abroad https://nypost.com/2026/05/11/us-news/dni-tulsi-gabbard-probes-us-funding-to-more-than-120-biolabs-abroad @TulsiGabbard

👍3816🍌1

13 Apr 2026, 19:58 UTC≈2,220 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Newly-declassified records expose how deep state actors within the Intelligence Community concocted a false narrative that Congress used to usurp the will of the American people and impeach duly-elected President @DonaldJTrump in 2019. Today, we reveal the truth 👇 https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2026/4154-pr-06-26 @TulsiGabbard

👍24🔥12🙏86😘3

19 Mar 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,470 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Thanks to POTUS’ and @TulsiGabbard’s leadership, ODNI 2.0 is refocusing our agency on its CORE MISSION.🇺🇸 We are working to root out weaponization, end politicization, and restore analytical tradecraft and integrity. @TulsiGabbard

22👍11🙏8👎2

19 Mar 2026, 16:19 UTC≈1,390 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

At the Worldwide Threats hearing, @TulsiGabbard spoke the TRUTH about the danger of radical Islamist ideology: “The spread of Islamist ideology… poses a fundamental threat to freedom and the foundational principles that underpin Western civilization.” “President Trump's designation of certain Muslim Brotherhood chapters as Foreign Terrorist Organizations is a mechanism to SECURE Americans against this threat.” @Tu

25🙏13👍3👎2🔥2

19 Mar 2026, 05:03 UTC≈1,050 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌍🇺🇸 @TulsiGabbard opens the Worldwide Threats Hearing: “POTUS' strict enforcement of U.S. policies at the U.S. Mexico border and regionally has served as a deterrent and drastically reduced illegal immigration.” @TulsiGabbard

25👍14👎3

18 Mar 2026, 20:50 UTC965 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence today released the 2026 Annual Threat Assessment (ATA) of the U.S. Intelligence Community. 🔗 Read the assessment here: https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2026-Unclassified-Report.pdf @TulsiGabbard

👍1710💩1

23 Feb 2026, 19:57 UTC≈1,270 views61 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Tulsi's On 1 Year Fighting Against The Cartel in America @TulsiGabbard

👍3016❤‍🔥8🙏7

23 Feb 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,170 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Tulsi Gabbard On Rooting Out Insider Threats From The Deep State @TulsiGabbard

❤‍🔥2213👍8🙏8

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TulsiGabbard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,645 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tulsi Gabbard 🌺” (@TulsiGabbard), 1,548 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TulsiGabbard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.