Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Тулайф Маркетинг

Channel

Тулайф Маркетинг

@TulifeTulaeva

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

191subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002743852308
TypeChannel
Username@TulifeTulaeva
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/TulifeTulaeva

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1911951937 August 2026 — 195 subscribers8 August 2026 — 195 subscribers22 August 2026 — 194 subscribers29 August 2026 — 195 subscribers9 September 2026 — 193 subscribers29 September 2026 — 192 subscribers10 October 2026 — 191 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 63 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 190–196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 03:01191-1
29 Sept 2026, 23:19192-1
9 Sept 2026, 00:39193-2
29 Aug 2026, 16:58195+1
22 Aug 2026, 22:07194-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:47195no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:26195first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 11s
Average length
4m 26s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3271.1%
👍613.3%
❤511.1%
❤‍🔥12.22%
💯12.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Apr 2026, 18:14 UTC172 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥4👍1

25 Feb 2026, 20:10 UTC200 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Был ли полезен подробный обзор маркетингового инструмента свЗанный с роликами?

  1. Да74%
  2. Нет0%
  3. Ничего не понятно26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Feb 2026, 20:03 UTC173 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В реальном времени собрали обратную связь от производственников... Запустили тест в профильных Telegram-группах. Спросили: «Какой ролик понятнее?». Получили не просто голоса, а срез восприятия аудитории по двум разным уровням. ЛАЙФХАК: ЧТОБЫ АДМИНЫ ГРУППЫ НЕ УДАЛИЛИ ВАШ КОНТЕНТ, ВЫ ЗАХОДИТЕ ЧЕРЕЗ КОСВЕННЫЙ ОПРОС АУДИТОРИИ НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ ПРОСМОТРЫ, СПОРЫ, КОММЕНТАРИИ ПРИВЛЕКАЮТ ВНИМАНИЕ К ВАШЕМУ ПРОДУКТУ ИЛИ УСЛУГЕ Т…

❤3💯1

25 Feb 2026, 19:33 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026

Вот реальные отзывы от производственников

25 Feb 2026, 19:33 UTC104 viewsread 8 August 2026

1 - боль производственника и владельца 2. Нудятина для владельца. Рома опередил

25 Feb 2026, 19:33 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026

Первый ролик больше эмоциональный, но меннее правдивый. Да и второй, особенно во второй его части. Оба ролика слишком много на себя берут. Далеко не все потребности закроет твой станок. Я так думаю, примерно, процентов 10, а может и меньше, от требуемых запчастей и расходных материалов. Шестерни для редукторов и механизмов станков, подшипники, сервопривода и моторы, швп и направляющие. Ремонт всевозможных электронны…

25 Feb 2026, 19:33 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ни один не понятный. Не цепляет. Либо я не ваша ца (но скорее всего я = ца). Если это какая то серия роликов - и это вторая и не последняя серия, то возможно и ок. Посыл из этих двух понятен только такой что: условно какой то принтер условно как то заменяет какую то условную производственную цепочку (пусть даже при замене детали) при производстве какой то ржавой муфты (наверняка не только ее он делает, но в ролике т…

❤1

25 Feb 2026, 19:33 UTC91 viewsread 8 August 2026

Лучше и не сказать, согласен по всем пунктам. Первый ролик немного лучше воспринимается, но оба как-то не цепляют, какое-то все "синтетическое". Ну и куча вопросов: что деталь из принтера как из сказки появляется, без чертежей, без документации, без согласования с эксплуатирующей службой, оттуда она вообще и из чего, как сделана? Посыл в целом понятен, но как-то не так реализован.

25 Feb 2026, 19:33 UTC93 viewsread 8 August 2026

У нас есть политика не вводить в заблуждение клиентов, поэтому поддержать не могу) . На ролике что-то типа ротора от насоса диаметром 30-40 см, чтобы такую штуку напечатать, надо принтер купить миллионов эдак за 30-40 и потом ещё доводить нужные поверхности на том же токарнике или фрезере. Ну и естественно этот момент станет очевидным для покупателя и будет неловкий момент...

25 Feb 2026, 19:33 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026

Второй. Но у тут возникают разные вопросы: - а отсканировать нужно все заранее, пока детальки новые и не сломанные - а разве после 3д печати шероховатость достаточная и можно обойтись без последующей обработки - а прочности такого метода достаточно для нагрузки и деталь не развалится на части повредив другие детали механизма На мой взгляд, если бы в ролике были ответы на подобные вопросы, тогда предлагается реально…

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TulifeTulaeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Feb 2026, 20:10 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

Был ли полезен подробный обзор маркетингового инструмента свЗанный с роликами?

  1. Да74%
  2. Нет0%
  3. Ничего не понятно26%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Feb 2026, 16:22 UTCAnonymous Poll122 voters

Какой ролик понятнее отражает суть и боль?

  1. Первый66%
  2. Второй17%
  3. Никакой16%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2025 to 20 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тулайф Маркетинг” (@TulifeTulaeva), 191 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TulifeTulaeva.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.