Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for تُحْفَـةُ السَّائِـرِينَ .

Channel

تُحْفَـةُ السَّائِـرِينَ .

@TuhfatAlsairin

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,989subscribers

+40 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001567992075
TypeChannel
Username@TuhfatAlsairin
Description• ﴿وَالَّذِينَ جَاهَدُوا فِينَا لَنَهْدِيَنَّهُمْ سُبُلَنَا﴾ • مساحةٌ إيمانيّة للكلمةِ الهادفة، والموعظةِ التي تُوقظُ القلبَ وتُعينُ على السيرِ إلى الله. • للتواصل: @Ycdt44bot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held4
On Telegramt.me/TuhfatAlsairin

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

@TuhfatAlsairin was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@MedicalManiacs
held 4 September 2026 – 4 September 2026

Growth

4,9264,9894,957.54 September 2026 — 4,949 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,926 subscribers25 September 2026 — 4,989 subscribers25 September 2026 — 4,989 subscribers4 September 202625 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 21 days, net +40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,917–4,998 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 07:224,989no change
25 Sept 2026, 06:474,989+63
6 Sept 2026, 18:594,926-23
4 Sept 2026, 17:224,949first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.80%
avg views ÷ 4,989 subscribers
Avg views / post
289
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held40 (4 September 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total11,566
Reactions total763
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,920
Videos
≈352
Links
≈84

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

763 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 61137111192122218048010.5%
custom 6008122363307102604759.83%
💘678.78%
🕊567.34%
custom 5879649570677332627536.95%
custom 5798494630316085967466.03%
custom 5805670326666795468435.64%
custom 5314408385347608714425.50%
custom 5323593993248848758415.37%
custom 5796357484654368289415.37%
custom 5807400919314209834374.85%
custom 6041748276447809185374.85%
custom 6007935141387704379324.19%
custom 5456390434966224012243.15%
custom 5269566848013200446233.01%
💔222.88%
custom 5798509061406201106182.36%
custom 5796492333742560889131.70%
custom 6008090413045388153131.70%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 763 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 40 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TuhfatAlsairin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 September 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 21:24 UTC121 views14 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

اللَّهُمَّ صَلِّ وَسَلِّمْ وَبَارِكْ عَلَى سَيِّدِنَا مُحَمَّدٍ ﷺ.

custom 600809041304538815313🕊1

24 Sept 2026, 17:05 UTC192 views35 reactionsread 25 September 2026

«لا خَيْرَ في وُدِّ امرِئٍ مُتَمَلِّقٍ، حُلْوِ اللِّسانِ، وقَلْبُهُ يَتَلَهَّبُ؛ يُعْطِيكَ مِن طَرَفِ اللِّسانِ حَلاوَةً، ويَرُوغُ مِنْكَ كما يَرُوغُ الثَّعْلَبُ؛ يَلْقَاكَ يَحْلِفُ أنَّهُ بِكَ واثِقٌ، وإذا تَوارى عَنْكَ فَهُوَ العَقْرَبُ».▫️

custom 526956684801320044623custom 600793514138770437912

24 Sept 2026, 02:24 UTC358 views31 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026

«صَلاةُ الفَجرِ أساسُ العَملِ وأوَّلُه». ابن القيّم رحمهُ اللَّه.

custom 587964957067733262720🕊11

23 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC426 views34 reactionsread 25 September 2026

-

custom 611371111921222180419custom 600793514138770437910💘5

23 Sept 2026, 18:37 UTC449 views52 reactions2 Starsread 25 September 2026

📌 الانشغال الوهمي ؛ 🟢كم مرة انتهى يومك وأنت تشعر أنك لم تتوقف لحظة، ثم سألت نفسك: ماذا أنجزت فعلًا؟ لتكتشف أن التعب كان كبيرًا، لكن الثمرة قليلة؟ 🔗قد يمتلئ يوم الإنسان بالمهام والرسائل والتنقل المستمر بين الأمور، فيبدو وكأنه في سباق لا ينتهي، بينما هو في الحقيقة لا يقترب من غايته. فكثرة الحركة لا تعني دائمًا التقدّم، والانشغال ليس دليلًا على الإنتاج 🟢ومن أخفى صور الانشغال الوهمي ؛ أن نملأ يومنا بما هو سهل وعاجل، ون…

custom 611371111921222180430💘12custom 600793514138770437910

23 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC416 views24 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026

الإنسان لا يُلامُ على شعوره، بل يُلامُ على سلوكه.

custom 545639043496622401224

22 Sept 2026, 21:14 UTC461 views50 reactionsread 25 September 2026

لا تسمح لكثرة ما تراه من الأخطاء أن تُطفئ في داخلك رغبةَ الإصلاح، ولا أن تجعلك تألف ما كنت تنكره. ستجد في حياتك أموراً لا تملك تغييرها، ومواقف لا تستطيع إصلاحها، لكن يكفي ألّا تفقد قلبك إحساسه بالحق، ولا رغبتك في أن يكون لك أثرٌ صالح. فليس المطلوب أن تُصلح كل شيء، وإنما ألّا تستسلم حتى يصبح الخطأ عاديّاً في عينيك.

custom 611371111921222180431custom 600812236330710260415💘4

22 Sept 2026, 21:00 UTC446 views57 reactionsread 25 September 2026

اللهمَّ التمامَ على خير، يا رب، اختر لي ولا تُخيّرني، ودبّر لي فإني لا أُحسن التدبير، واكتب لي الخير حيث كان، ثم أرضِني به.

custom 587964957067733262733custom 579850906140620110618💘6

21 Sept 2026, 21:11 UTC500 views72 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026

‏وإن شِئت بُكاءً فابكِ على عبادتِك التي قلّت وعزيمتك التي وهنت!

custom 579849463031608596746custom 532359399324884875822💘4

21 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC582 views68 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026
Photo

﴿وَاصْبِرْ لِحُكْمِ رَبِّكَ فَإِنَّكَ بِأَعْيُنِنَا ۖ وَسَبِّحْ بِحَمْدِ رَبِّكَ حِينَ تَقُومُ﴾ . [الطور: 48]

custom 579635748465436828941💘14custom 579649233374256088913

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @TuhfatAlsairin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇵🇸 ↓الطب النفسي Psychiatry
@PsycGuide · 32,688
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تُحْفَـةُ السَّائِـرِينَ .” (@TuhfatAlsairin), 4,989 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TuhfatAlsairin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.