я покажу это видео всем
custom 57762644937723147206

Channel
@TrueRocketFan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002782762081 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TrueRocketFan |
| Description | затем исчезнут страны. Убийцы и тираны |
| Created | 12 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TrueRocketFan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 23 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 23 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
162 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5776264493772314720 | 33 | 20.4% | |
| custom 5456158571156759435 | 30 | 18.5% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 10.5% | |
| custom 5312554784836833866 | 13 | 8.02% | |
| 🐳 | 11 | 6.79% | |
| custom 5249203209766990520 | 10 | 6.17% | |
| custom 5373003352856619266 | 10 | 6.17% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 6.17% | |
| custom 5260236972160487787 | 7 | 4.32% | |
| custom 5776418532774385985 | 6 | 3.70% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| custom 5282946190831294786 | 4 | 2.47% | |
| custom 5354868776867214166 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| custom 5776040863415146598 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.617% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
я покажу это видео всем
custom 57762644937723147206
File, posted without a caption
custom 52492032097669905202
ㅤ۫ ㅤ⏝ܵۜ͡︶ㅤ᮫ ƈσʂραყҽɾ+օʀƈǟ 𝖋𝖆𝖓 ㅤࣲㅤ ˳ֵ̣̣̣۫ㅤ̣ 𝗜 𝓵𝓸𝓿𝓮 ᎦᎵᎯᏟᏋ╶ 𝓫𝓽𝔀! ┓╯Judelow irl btw ﹋﹋﹋◠﹏﹋﹋﹋﹋╮﹎﹋﹋﹋﹋﹋ my pretty bf
custom 52492032097669905208custom 57762644937723147208custom 53730033528566192665custom 57760408634151465981
︶ִّ֯᤺⏝︶ִّ֯᤺︶ ︶ ︶ ⏝֯ؔ𓈒ֵ۫ ፝֟͡𐴐ᩬᮬ 😀😀😀😀😀︶ִّ֯᤺...😀 😀😀😀😀 ޭ ๎ᜆؖ֙քʊʟ𝒮å𝘳𓈒ֵ۫ 𝅻͡ ໊ܝރའ 😀😀😀😀🤩😀🤩😀😀 😀😀😀😀ȶɦɛʏ/ᴛʜᴇᴍ 🤩 ︶ִّ֯᤺⏝֯ؔㅤۢࠖ 𓈒ֵܸٟ۫꒰ᩫᰰ───୨ৎ─𓈒ֵ۫ ͡𐴐ᩬᮬ──𓈒ֵ۫ ፝֟͡𐴐ᩬᮬ𓈒ֵ۫ ፝֟͡
custom 53730033528566192664
THIS IS A FUCKING SPAWN DAY ROCKET
custom 57762644937723147206custom 52829461908312947864custom 53125547848368338664custom 53548687768672141661
с новым годом
custom 53125547848368338668custom 57764185327743859855custom 57762644937723147204custom 53548687768672141661
ребяиа, сегодня 25 сентября 2025 года весь мир взорвался my fucking spawn day
custom 545615857115675943512🔥7🐳5🎉2❤1custom 53125547848368338661
ㅤۢࠖ 𓈒ֵܸٟ۫꒰ᩫᰰ𓈒ֵ۫ ፝֟͡𐴐ᩬᮬⲧⲩⲧ ⲃы ⲙⲟⲯⲉⲧⲉ ⲃыⲥⲕⲁⳅⲁⲧь ʍнᴇниᴇ о͚б͚о͚ м͚н͚е͚︶ִّ֯᤺⏝֯ؔ ────୨ৎ────😀😀😀😀🤩😀😀︶ ⏝ ︶ ୨୧ ︶ ⏝ ︶ ᅠ !!!ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠᅠ ᅠ🤩😀🤩 напомню,что правил нет!ᅠ🤩 но,я могу вас забанить😀🤩
custom 54561585711567594359🐳4custom 57762644937723147203custom 53730033528566192661
🖥️Who are you to me?!—
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 54561585711567594359custom 52602369721604877877custom 57762644937723147206❤1custom 57764185327743859851
╭╼━━ ᮫ Oh, w0W!... ࣪ 🌼 ꒱ ┊ Похоже, Рокет не на шутку влюбился и не остановится ни перед чем на пути к своей любви.. Кто же эта одержимость? ╰┄ ╮ ⎯⎯ ׄ ୨ ୧ ׄㅤ⎯⎯ ㅤׅАх, разYмЕется это @ktoyon со счётом в 22 голоса!! |꛱|꛱ ꛱ ꛱|꛱| ꛱ |꛱| . °. ⃟♡ |꛱| ꛱ |꛱| ꛱ ꛱ |꛱| @grechkasmainobsession
родная свиноферма
❤3🥰2🐳1
ᨦ 🤩 ᨩ 𝓓а, я кинню 🎀окета и я не люблю всё, что связано с моим прошлым. ꒰ ᛝ да, я кинню . . . ᎒ phighting
❤4🐳1💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @TrueRocketFan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🖥️Who are you to me?!—
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 22 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 356,156 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TrueRocketFan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“˗ˏˋ ´ˎ˗” (@TrueRocketFan), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrueRocketFan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.