Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Trinco’s Database👨🏽‍💻( MAIN )

@TrincosDatabase

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

587subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002262608524
TypeChannel
Username@TrincosDatabase
DescriptionX: https://x.com/TrincoXYZ DMs: @TrincoXYZ | @TrincoCasino Disclaimer: Nothing shared is financial advice. All content is provided for educational and informational purposes only.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/TrincosDatabase

Growth

586587586.57 Aug 2026, 14:04 — 586 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:59 — 587 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:19 — 587 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:048 Aug 2026, 03:19
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 586–587 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:19587no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:59587+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:04586first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 587 subscribers
Avg views / post
105
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,359
Reactions total79
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
107
Videos
46
Links
126

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
44s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 17 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
126100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TrincosDatabase. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC66 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A few examples of other projects that were shilled to me in the DMs

5

5 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC81 views4 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Not quite a 2x yet, but it’s moving slow and steady I’ve seen other projects being shilled in my DMs drop over 90%, after the first 24horus while $VAULT continues to hold strong. I believe we should be above $100K by the end of the week.

4

5 Aug 2026, 04:56 UTC58 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

BlackVault [VAULT] 🪶Buy! ⭐️⭐️ 💀| 0.016 WETH ($29.86) 💀| Got: 870,100 VAULT 💀| MC: $34,316 💀| Pool: uniswap_v3 💀| Buyer | Txn 💀| Telegram | X | Website 💀Dex Paid

4 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC81 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

GM bros. I think we’re back sooner than I expected. Was in a VC earlier and the amount of normies and retail chatter I was hearing was wild. Heard PoorGoat mention that over $100K was used via Apple Pay in the last 24 hours to buy $CATE on Fomo. that’s honestly insane.

8

2 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC100 views10 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

https://x.com/TrincoXYZ/status/2083750057786908890?s=20

10

31 Jul 2026, 23:24 UTC107 views6 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Damm bros stay safe everyone take extra steps to keep your funds safe

6

31 Jul 2026, 23:24 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuru

JUST IN: $40 million worth of Bitcoin stolen after 500 'Coldcard' hardware wallets were hacked. @WatcherGuru

31 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC164 views12 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

I’ve been watching this project over the past few days, and it looks like it may have found a bottom around $20K market cap Gud tech and the dev has previous project $2M I’m scooping here while it’s still cheap looks like a strong R/R at these levels CA: 0xf387b73cef53ac9f7d3b5c74e2caed386e50cf7a

12

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @TrincosDatabase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trinco’s Database👨🏽‍💻( MAIN )” (@TrincosDatabase), 587 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrincosDatabase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.