Channel
@TributeNewsEN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
42,193subscribers
-360 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001843775061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TributeNewsEN |
| Description | @Tribute — a convenient service for monetization on Telegram. Support: @TributeCreatorBot For cooperation: [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TributeNewsEN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 42,193 | -26 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 42,219 | -77 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 42,296 | -44 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 42,340 | -59 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:51 | 42,399 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 42,425 | -64 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 42,489 | -48 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:20 | 42,537 | -16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 42,553 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 42,553 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (17 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,945 |
| Reactions total | 100 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
100 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 69 | 69.0% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 16.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 3.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧭 "Who am I to charge for this?" It feels like paid content is for people with credentials, status, and thousands of hours behind them. And if you simply know your subject well, opening a paid channel seems premature. Behind this sits one assumption: that people only pay those at the peak of mastery. In reality, people follow you in one of two roles. ⭐️ The Guide — "I've already walked this path and I'll take you …
❤4👍1
🧭 Selling a product or selling yourself Classic marketing rests on one axiom: get to know your audience, figure out what they already pay for, and offer them exactly that. It's a solid, effective approach. But for authors, the opposite often works just as well. You write about yourself: your journey, your goals, your experience, your views. And people are drawn to exactly that. They buy not so much the product as …
❤5👍1🔥1
🎁 Got more than he bargained for (post 3 of 3) The finale of Ivan Borisov's story. Start here → link to the first post A quick recap: Ivan was building a club with a large audience in mind and decided early to sort out payments in advance, so he wouldn't have to handle everything by hand later. He tried Tribute on a few separate tasks, it all worked — and he moved the whole club over to it. What he liked right a…
❤3😁1
🌱 How the average Tribute author grows Yesterday we put your intuition to the test: we asked how many subscribers the average author reaches in a year. More than half of you answered "over 100" — and you were right. Your instincts didn't let you down 🔥 Now, here's why that number matters so much. The most common doubt an author has before starting a paid channel sounds like this: "I've only got a couple hundred s…
❤7
📊 Let's test your intuition The average creator on Tribute starts with 12 subscribers in their first week. We calculated how far they grow in a year — and the number surprised us. Your guess?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚙️ Plan it all out in advance, so you're not putting out fires later (post 2 of 3) We're continuing Ivan Borisov's story. The beginning is here → link to the first post A quick recap: Ivan figured out how to bring in new people without advertising, built a solution powered by AI agents, and used it to create his Academy. It turned out great. But the audience interested in this proved to be a narrow one — and Ivan…
❤3
💸 Half of subscribers never make it to a second payment Authors often pour all their attention and effort into attracting new subscribers. They run ads, set up collaborations. And that makes sense — a new subscriber is a result you can see right away. What happens to them a month or six months later isn't so obvious. We looked at the data across 2.9 million monthly subscriptions on Tribute, and here's the picture:…
❤6🔥2
🚀 He solved his own problem — and helped 325 more people (Post 1 of 3) This is the story of one of our creators, Ivan Borisov, told in three parts. Ivan runs the @mlgfrontier channel. We’ll explain how Ivan built an audience without advertising, launched a paid community, and eventually received an unexpected bonus from using Tribute. Let’s start with the problem he needed to solve. More than a year ago, Ivan wa…
🔥9❤5👏3
💌 3 messages a month that keep subscriptions renewing Renewals are the clearest measure of how a creator is really doing. People renew for the content and for your take on things. But there's one more factor: whether a subscriber feels a real person behind the subscription — someone they want to stay with. Showing that person, and lifting your sales along the way, takes only three messages a month. And not one of…
❤7
When a promo code actually works A discount can bring you new subscribers — or just shrink the income from people who were already paying. We've put together who should get a promo code and who definitely shouldn't: 4 mistakes that eat into your profit
❤5
Raise Your Price — Subscribers Win Many creators put off raising their price: it feels like subscribers will see the new amount and leave. But in Tribute, the new price only applies to new subscribers. Everyone already subscribed keeps paying exactly what they paid on the day they signed up — until they cancel themselves. So it gets more expensive only for new subscribers. Everyone who's been with you a while stay…
❤7👍2👏1
Big news from our friends at STON.fi Cross-chain swaps with TRON are now live on their platform — meaning you can move stablecoins (like USDT) directly from one blockchain to another. No extra steps, no hassle! Great news for creators who get paid in USDT: moving your funds between major networks just got easier and faster 💸 Check out the full details in the STON.fi channel post
😁3🎉2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @TributeNewsEN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 Let's test your intuition The average creator on Tribute starts with 12 subscribers in their first week. We calculated how far they grow in a year — and the number surprised us. Your guess?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 274,668 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tribute | Monetize your content” (@TributeNewsEN), 42,193 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TributeNewsEN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.