Grateful to call these guys friends and colleagues. https://t.co/dNYf4w6FPO
❤31🤝5😁1

Channel
@TreyYingst
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,338subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001987410499 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TreyYingst |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TreyYingst |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 1,338 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 1,342 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 1,346 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 1,349 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 1,349 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
201 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 56 | 27.9% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 21.9% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 9.95% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 7.96% | |
| 🤬 | 13 | 6.47% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 2.49% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 2.49% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.99% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.995% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.995% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.498% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.498% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.498% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2025 to 30 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Grateful to call these guys friends and colleagues. https://t.co/dNYf4w6FPO
❤31🤝5😁1
RT @BillMelugin_: Got the @FoxNews squad together. 🦊 @LawrenceBJones3 @TreyYingst @foymeetsworld https://t.co/10bXYMlA1M
🔥5👍1
Lots of chatter tonight of a serious incident in Gaza involving IDF soldiers. There is no confirmed information or official comment from the Israeli military. Waiting to report any details until we get more.
🙏10👍4🤬1
RT @generalkellogg: Last night Russia launched the second largest aerial attack of the war with 600 drones and 31 missiles. The targets? No…
🙏5😢4👍1🤬1🤯1
Kyiv is burning once again as Russia continues large-scale missile and drone attacks against Ukraine.
🙏7🤬2😭2👍1👏1
RT @FoxNews: 10-year-old witness describes the Minneapolis school church shooting: "My friend Victor — he was like laying on top of me lik…
😢6👍1
Horrific news out of Minneapolis where two children were killed by a gunman in a Catholic school. 17 others were injured. Thinking of the victims and their families.
🙏7😢5⚡1❤1
Full statement by the FPA: https://t.co/8tMXOib6eP
The Foreign Press Association has released a statement following the killing of more journalists in Gaza. “Too many journalists in Gaza have been killed by Israel without justification…This must be a watershed moment. We appeal to international leaders: do everything you can to
🤡5🙏5👍1😢1
RT @AP: BREAKING: Four journalists, including a freelancer who worked with AP, are among eight killed by an Israeli strike on southern Gaza…
🔥5🙏4👍2
One of the Israeli strikes on the Nasser hospital complex was captured on live video as rescue crews arrived at the scene of an Israeli strike minutes before. https://t.co/uysRPPkl4E
👍3🔥1
Large explosions rock Sanaa, Yemen as Israel targets Houthi-linked positions. The strikes come after new ballistic missile launches this month by the Houthis. https://t.co/iuwtyFLaGa
🔥8👍2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TreyYingst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 91,215 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@TreyYingst named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trey Yingst” (@TreyYingst), 1,338 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TreyYingst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.