Channel
@TrevorWie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
267subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002206582124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TrevorWie |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TrevorWie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 267 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 269 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 269 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
186 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 131 | 70.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 10.8% | |
| 👎 | 13 | 6.99% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 3.76% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 3.23% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.15% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.08% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 30 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Just had two impromptu wet-season campers. Ana, a filmmaker on spiritual exploration from Slovenia, and Jerem, an archeologist from Aus. Lucky Ana had a van, as it's a bit wet for tents. She sent this endorsement this dawning.
❤14⚡2
Spending a week with Trev was a deeply grounding and illuminating experience. He shared foundational knowledge about how this world works energetically — not as theory, but as something lived, sensed, and practiced. It felt like wisdom we should have been taught long ago: simple, essential understandings about being human in relationship with land, life, and ourselves. Through stories, time on country, and direct e…
❤19
Binary Thinking and its Blind Spots Greg Reece Report https://t.me/australiaforfreedom
👍7❤3
Thanks all. Was busy when it arrived though appeared dubious and quickly asked the question here.
👍5❤1
Anyone know if this is legit?
👎13🤔4
Video, posted without a caption
❤17
Video, posted without a caption
❤20
Tumeric hill now in full flush with many in flower. This is a native tumeric patch extending about 50 metres up the hill which runs for around 200 metres along Green Ant Creek walk in Litchfield National Park. The site is about 18km from home. Love it. You have to be here in the wet season to enjoy nature like this 🤗
❤18🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤16
Less than 2 days notice of this event from when I saw the promotional email. I rang them to see if I could make a presence there. They said yes. So I quickly made this up whilst dealing with the other daily priority tasks on the block. So this is the beginning of an earnest promotion for next years eight different offerings from Bimbimbi Wallaby.
🙏6❤2
👆🏽Invitation Link Meeting ID: 833 3062 0108 Passcode: u95yjf
👆🏽
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TrevorWie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trevor Wie” (@TrevorWie), 267 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrevorWie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.