Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trench Signals

Channel

Trench Signals

@Trench_Signals

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,303subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001442099631
TypeChannel
Username@Trench_Signals
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Trench_Signals

Growth

3,3033,3353,3196 August 2026 — 3,334 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,334 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,335 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,334 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,330 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,325 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,322 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,314 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,312 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,303 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,298–3,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 11:343,303-9
25 Aug 2026, 05:093,312-2
22 Aug 2026, 00:353,314-8
18 Aug 2026, 15:343,322-3
15 Aug 2026, 16:273,325-5
12 Aug 2026, 11:543,330-4
9 Aug 2026, 19:053,334-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:103,335+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:163,334no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:493,334first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.7%
avg views ÷ 3,303 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total3,150
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

244 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9639.3%
💯3815.6%
3614.8%
👍208.20%
🔥197.79%
👀156.15%
👌83.28%
🤣52.05%
🐳41.64%
🫡20.82%
🤝10.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,600 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$CHIIKAWA

17👍7💯7🐳4

Signed ElonTrades | Signal Labs

3 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC≈1,550 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$Chiikawa https://dexscreener.com/solana/2c1KjiyQow66QfsnCtoyuqfo3AuxgpBMEoAq5oiiXqdu

👀156💯4

Signed ElonTrades | Signal Labs

29 Jul 2026, 03:16 UTC≈1,910 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

First token on cashcat launchpad 0x4f0d7ea112547af5dad59959d98b6a8ee3355bcc

8👍5💯5

Signed ElonTrades | Signal Labs

26 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC≈2,480 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

I’m testing out the FOMO app. Ignore my rank 😂 Super late to it but I do like how it works. You can track people's holding's, entries, etc. Can be useful. Feel free to give me a follow. https://fomo.family/r/elontrades

20🔥19🤣5🫡2🤝1

Signed ElonTrades | Signal Labs

24 Jul 2026, 03:50 UTC≈1,770 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/gamestoponchain?s=11&t=GOsLhni2k4T-VMpH1YYX_w

💯1081

Signed ElonTrades | Signal Labs

18 Jul 2026, 07:41 UTC≈3,010 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x7a9531d4e1adc94db544f692bbd0209b38d2e704

16👌8👍86

Signed ElonTrades | Signal Labs

8 Jul 2026, 07:46 UTC≈2,010 views59 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Robinhood’s L2 launched recently; “a permissionless Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain built on Arbitrum Orbit technology. It features fast block times (~100ms), low fees, ETH as the native gas token, and a focus on tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) like stock tokens (e.g., NVDA, AAPL), DeFi, lending, and AI agents.” Vlad Tenev pushing it hard for both RWA and Memes. Cashcat hit $100m. Swapping over to Robinhood on Unis

39💯128

Signed ElonTrades | Signal Labs

30 Jun 2026, 04:33 UTC562 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ansem - OG/ Update The Black Bull/ Ansem hit ATH of 150m which means the OG is hugely undervalued. F23GvgK5TvSA78FmibZot7gtU3yfAiPb4BkD4RrZc18B

Signed Bruce

29 Jun 2026, 07:41 UTC504 viewsread 7 August 2026

2x so far and still quiet hours, think we can see a nice few X's in the next 12h or so, lets see.

Signed Bruce

29 Jun 2026, 04:20 UTC500 viewsread 7 August 2026

$Susan - Ansem's Mom/Sol Ansem coins are going insane at the moment sucking all the liquidity. Fresh CTO on OG Ansems mum with an ATH of 11m, seems an obvious play. 5aGByWa7UFXDELNtx9dQHi8knnMRHTGLkjdDRLu6Ebm6 https://dexscreener.com/solana/9fx2bKKBTQCcDW8KEHz9EDj1nPjz7Lkg5JGCYecwADgN DYOR

Signed Bruce

29 Jun 2026, 00:43 UTC318 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐦 Share on 𝕏 and tag @RickBurpBot 💭 NEW: Introducing comments

Signed Bruce

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Trench_Signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trench Signals” (@Trench_Signals), 3,303 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Trench_Signals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.