https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw7x-T3cTP4
❤8

Channel
@Transumanism
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,805subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002402665478 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Transumanism |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Transumanism |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 1,805 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 1,805 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
145 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 98 | 67.6% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 18.6% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 5.52% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 4.14% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 2.07% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.38% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 22 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iw7x-T3cTP4
❤8
IN FACT, BEHIND THE CIRCLE OF BOMBS THAT IS CURRENTLY UNCOVERING BEFORE OUR EYES IS THE UN’S 2030 AGENDA, WHICH GOAL IS BIODIGITAL CONVERGENCE, TOTAL CONTROL OF HUMAN BEINGS, TRANSFORMING HUMANS INTO SOMETHING ELSE. USA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, ISRAEL, ALL ARE UN MEMBERS, ALL HAVE COMMITTED TO ACHIEVING THE GOALS OF THE 2030 AGENDA, ALL HAVE ADVANCED NANOTECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS AND OTHER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES!!! UNFORTUNATE…
🙏6❤3👏1
The books I referred to - books that contain important information regarding the covid vaccination fraud, but do not address the subject of the nanotechnology component of covid vaccines at all. - The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity, Oct 15, 2024, Naomi Wolf , Amy Kelly - The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health (Children’s Health Defense), No…
❤5👏2
1. Human rights implications of new and emerging technologies in the military domain - Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee, UN , 14 July 2025, https://docs.un.org/A/HRC/60/63, https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/60/63 2. THE ROAD TO 2012: Looking Towards the Next Two Decades, John L. Petersen, The Arlington Institute, March 1993 , https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA272448.pdf 3. „Complaint of Medical …
❤7
https://youtu.be/-aCBwCDANJM Abia aștept ca aceste informații/ provocări să ajungă la luptătorii americani pentru aflarea adevărului asupra vaccinării covid, luptători care , în mod de neînțeles, abordează la nesfârșit și fără finalitate doar aspectele ce țin de ARNm și proteina spike, omițând să discute despre nanotehnologia din vaccinurile covid. Același lucru este valabil și pentru vaccinurile antihepatită B și a…
❤9👏3
🇬🇧 #English - Nanotechnology in Vaccines and the Silence of the Dissent: The Core of Agenda 2030 In this pivotal intervention, Dr. Geanina Hagimă addresses the technical reality of the nanotechnological components in vaccines and denounces the information blockade imposed by sectors of controlled opposition that should be informing the population. The key points of this video include: * Nanotechnology in the Vials…
❤5👍2
🇫🇷 #Français - CONVERGENCE BIODIGITALE : DES MÉDECINS ROUMAINS DÉNONCENT AU PARLEMENT UN AGENDA DE CONTRÔLE TECHNOLOGIQUE. Le 14 novembre 2025 s'est tenue la conférence multidisciplinaire « COVID-19 et la Convergence Biodigitale ». L'événement a eu lieu dans l'une des salles du Palais du Parlement de Roumanie, un espace obtenu en dernière instance grâce à la gestion d'un parti d'opposition après la censure préalable…
❤6🔥1
🇩🇪 #Deutsch - BIODIGITALE KONVERGENZ: RUMÄNISCHE ÄRZTE PRANGERN IM PARLAMENT EINE AGENDA ZUR TECHNOLOGISCHEN KONTROLLE AN. Am 14. November 2025 fand die multidisziplinäre Konferenz „COVID-19 und die biodigitale Konvergenz“ statt. Die Veranstaltung wurde in einem der Säle des rumänischen Parlamentspalastes abgehalten – ein Raum, der in letzter Instanz dank der Bemühungen einer Oppositionspartei nach vorangegangener Z…
❤2
🇪🇸 #Español - CONVERGENCIA BIODIGITAL: MÉDICOS RUMANOS DENUNCIAN EN EL PARLAMENTO UNA AGENDA DE CONTROL TECNOLÓGICO. El 14 de noviembre de 2025, se llevó a cabo la conferencia multidisciplinar “COVID-19 y la Convergencia Biodigital”. El evento tuvo lugar en una de las salas del Palacio del Parlamento de Rumanía, un espacio obtenido en última instancia, gracias a la gestión de un partido de la oposición tras la censu…
❤4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87R1j2nKmsI
❤5👍2
🇪🇸 #Español - CONVERGENCIA BIODIGITAL: MÉDICOS RUMANOS DENUNCIAN EN EL PARLAMENTO UNA AGENDA DE CONTROL TECNOLÓGICO. El 14 de noviembre de 2025, se llevó a cabo la conferencia multidisciplinar “COVID-19 y la Convergencia Biodigital”. El evento tuvo lugar en una de las salas del Palacio del Parlamento de Rumanía, un espacio obtenido en última instancia, gracias a la gestión de un partido de la oposición tras la censu…
👍4❤2
🇬🇧 #English - BIODIGITAL CONVERGENCE: ROMANIAN DOCTORS DENOUNCE A TECHNOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENDA AT THE PARLIAMENT. On November 14, 2025, the multidisciplinary conference “COVID-19 and Biodigital Convergence” was held. The event took place in one of the halls of the Palace of the Parliament of Romania, a space secured at the last minute thanks to the efforts of an opposition party following prior censorship experience…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Transumanism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,161,032 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Transumanism” (@Transumanism), 1,805 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Transumanism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.