Channel
@TransplantSC
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,479subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001983574256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TransplantSC |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TransplantSC |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 1,479 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 1,477 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 1,476 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 1,477 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 1,475 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 1,475 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,387 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
64 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5449855539146140804 | 52 | 81.3% | |
| custom 5449606821884998722 | 12 | 18.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Это Нью Йорк и история и правда крутая. США: суд обусловил отсрочку заключения донорством почки Федеральный суд Восточного округа Нью-Йорка (судья Нусрат Чоудхури) поставил Кармину Аньелло — внуку Джона Готти (глава мафиозного клана Гамбино, «Тефлоновый дон», умер в тюрьме в 2002 г.), осуждённому на 15 месяцев за мошенничество с ковидными выплатами на 1,1 млн долл. — условие: если пересадка почки его матери Виктории …
«Или отдавай почку матери или отправляйся за решетку», сказал судья. Как Вы думаете, в какой стране это произошло?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если ты жертвуешь безопасностью пациента в угоду производительности, у тебя не будет ни безопасности, ни производительности. Еще одну лицензию OPO отозвали в США 5 августа 2026 г. Минздрав США (HHS) начал процедуру лишения федерального статуса организации Network for Hope, координировавшей донорство органов в Кентукки и части Огайо, Индианы и Западной Виргинии — около 7 млн человек, свыше 185 больниц. Формальное осн…
Сначала — то, что действительно можно назвать данными, а не сборником историй. Единственное систематическое исследование на эту тему (Bunzel et al., Quality of Life Research, 1992) опросило 47 реципиентов сердца. Результат обратен духу статьи: 79% сказали, что личность не изменилась вовсе; 15% — изменилась, но из-за пережитой угрозы жизни, а не из-за органа; и лишь 6% (три человека) связали перемену с новым сердцем. …
Ничего из истории донора в сердце не переезжает. Но тонкий срез диспозиции его тела — может. Это не мистика клеточной памяти; это иммунология трансплантации, и её подлинная мера ещё не написана. https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a69486262/heart-transplant-cellular-memory/
После пересадки сердца пациентка вспоминала воспоминания, которые ей не принадлежали. И она такая не одна — пишет Popular Mechanics, о феномене «клеточной памяти» С этой фразы начинается статья, которая гуляет по сети: женщина после трансплантации сердца разлюбила мясо и стала вегетарианкой, слышит незнакомые песни как «свои любимые», ловит чужие déjà vu. Вывод авторов: клетки донорского органа хранят память, и реци…
custom 54498555391461408042
Одна почка — целый мир Осень 2020-го, медцентр «Шиба» под Тель-Авивом. Здоровый человек добровольно ложится на стол и отдаёт свою почку тому, кого никогда не видел и не увидит. Не родственнику, не другу — незнакомцу из листа ожидания. На профессиональном языке это «ненаправленный альтруистический донор»: ты жертвуешь орган в систему, а не конкретному человеку. И тут стоит сказать пару слов о самом герое, потому что …
custom 544985553914614080414custom 54496068218849987221
В Израиле выборы и внезапно все стали обсуждать трансплантацию. Знакомьтесь: Моше Фейглин, кандидат и донор.
Если очень коротко: 🔹 Российская модель стремится ничего не пропустить за счёт расширенного объёма обследования. 🔹 Международная модель стремится назначать только те исследования, польза которых доказана, одновременно уделяя гораздо больше внимания индивидуальному риску самого донора. Вот несколько наиболее показательных примеров. 🧬 Онкомаркеры В российских рекомендациях предлагается рутинное определение целой п…
custom 54498555391461408048
🇷🇺 Живое донорство почки: почему российские и международные рекомендации настолько отличаются? На днях внимательно сравнили новые российские клинические рекомендации по прижизненному донорству почки с рекомендациями KDIGO, British Transplantation Society (BTS) и ERBP. Честно говоря, мы ожидали увидеть отдельные расхождения. На практике оказалось, что различается сама идеология обследования потенциального донора.
custom 54496068218849987221
🧬 Трансплантация β-клеток: почему именно сейчас о ней заговорил весь трансплантационный мир? Еще несколько лет назад трансплантация островков поджелудочной железы оставалась технологией для очень ограниченного круга пациентов. Донорских органов не хватало, пересаженные клетки требовали пожизненной иммуносупрессии, а долговременные результаты были далеки от идеальных. Сегодня ситуация меняется буквально на глазах. …
custom 54496068218849987224custom 54498555391461408041
Весь день мы спорим. Давно отвергнутые и безнадежные вроде бы технологии получают новые перспективы. Так было и с перфузией и с ксенотрансплантацией. Почему бы не с трансплантацией островков Лангерганса?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TransplantSC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«Или отдавай почку матери или отправляйся за решетку», сказал судья. Как Вы думаете, в какой стране это произошло?
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 470,245 of 1,624,174entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗦𝗣𝗟𝗔𝗡𝗧 𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗕” (@TransplantSC), 1,479 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TransplantSC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.