في عصر شاعت فيه الترجمة العربية بلسان الإنجليزية؛ أسعى إلى إعادة لسان العربية إلى الترجمات المتداولة.
مؤلف المنشورات
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ammqe/
أرشيف المترجمين - مصادر مساعدة للمترجم
http://translearner.weebly.com/
Created
Between 1 February 2016 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 78 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,195–9,327 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 06:58
9,214
+4
2 Nov 2026, 22:08
9,210
-2
30 Oct 2026, 23:07
9,212
-2
27 Oct 2026, 15:59
9,214
-12
24 Oct 2026, 06:35
9,226
-11
21 Oct 2026, 05:11
9,237
-10
18 Oct 2026, 09:10
9,247
-8
15 Oct 2026, 10:16
9,255
-7
12 Oct 2026, 17:15
9,262
-8
5 Oct 2026, 22:55
9,270
-11
28 Sept 2026, 15:57
9,281
-8
19 Sept 2026, 08:40
9,289
-7
15 Sept 2026, 03:00
9,296
-3
11 Sept 2026, 10:17
9,299
-2
7 Sept 2026, 01:56
9,301
-5
30 Aug 2026, 09:16
9,306
-6
27 Aug 2026, 06:04
9,312
+9
24 Aug 2026, 03:07
9,303
+36
20 Aug 2026, 05:03
9,267
no change
20 Aug 2026, 00:01
9,267
first reading
Engagement
46 posts held, back to 21 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.5%
avg views ÷ 9,214 subscribers
Avg views / post
968
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 46 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
46 (21 June 2025 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
20,320
Reactions total
214
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 10:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
519
Videos
31
Links
677
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
760 reactions across 45 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
483
63.6%
👏
199
26.2%
👌
48
6.32%
🤩
20
2.63%
🤯
10
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2025 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (9.52%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
في مستهل مسيرتي في الترجمة المرئية، حضرنا جلسة تدريبية أدارها رئيس قسم اللغة العربية بإحدى الشركات، واعترض حينها أحد الزملاء على عدّ إغفال "الشدة" خطأً موضوعيًا ينتقص من جهد المترجم.
فكان جواب المدرب أن إهمالها يعوق تجربة المشاهد؛ إذ يستوقفه أحيانًا لاسترجاع المشهد واستجلاء المعنى لدفع اللبس.
كنت ألتزم بوضع الشدة آنذاك بدافع التقيد بالقواعد لا عن اقتناع، غير أني مع طول المراس، أدركت وجاهة ما كان يرمي إليه.
فكلمة م…
مثلًا؛ قبل بضعة أيام كنت أترجم فيلمًا لغته الأصلية التركية، وفي اللغة التركية عبارة تحتمل معنيين، "اجلس" و"ادخل".
Sit down. Come on in.
وكان يلزم لضرورة سياقية فكاهية ألّا أجزم بمعنى الجلوس أو الدخول.
فترجمتها "تفضَّل"، والتي قد تعني تفضل بالدخول أو تفضل بالجلوس. 💁🏻♂️
هذا مثال على نقل احتمالية التأويل كما هي في المصدر، لكن في 99% من الحالات ينبغي للمترجم تجنب الترجمات التي تحتمل التأويل.
في رأيي، أسخف ما قد يُجاز في الترجمة؛ استخدام كلمة باعتبار انها تعني الشيء وعكسه. أبغض السلوكيات الترجمية لي هو صياغة ترجمات تحتمل التأويل ما لم يكن المصدر نفسه يحتمل التأويل.
...anyone who introduces themselves as a prosecutor or police officer.
...أي شخص يعرّف بنفسه أنه مدع عام أو ضابط شرطة.51%
...أي شخص يعرّف نفسه على أنه مدع عام أو ضابط شرطة.49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏6👌2
Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @Translearner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Now, my friends, since you've come all the way here, I'll walk you through what happened.
الآن يا صديقيّ، بما أنكما جئتما من بعيد، سأشرح لكما ما جرى.63%
الآن يا صديقيّ، لأنكما جئتما من بعيد، سأشرح لكما ما جرى.37%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2025 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Abanoub Aziz @azizabanoub · 74,372 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Translearner” (@Translearner), 9,214 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Translearner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
