Posted without readable text
👎2❤1

Channel
@Transformerxx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,573subscribers
+35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002225818906 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Transformerxx |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Transformerxx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 2,573 | +22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 2,551 | +13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 2,538 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,984 |
| Reactions total | 281 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
281 reactions across 12 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 60 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 15.7% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 15.3% | |
| 🤯 | 31 | 11.0% | |
| 👀 | 19 | 6.76% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 4.63% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 4.27% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 2.49% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| 🤨 | 6 | 2.14% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 1.78% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.78% | |
| 😨 | 5 | 1.78% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 🤷♀ | 4 | 1.42% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 🥱 | 3 | 1.07% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 0.712% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.712% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 1.42% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
👎2❤1
Как голландцы создали самую сложную машину в истории? Без которой весь мировой прогресс просто встанет, ведь через эту машину машину проходит каждый продвинутый чип. Вы когда-нибудь задумывались, почему монструозные литографы ASML, экстремальный ультрафиолет и прочие чипмейкерские приколы за гранью человеческого понимания появились именно в Нидерландах - небольшой и миленькой европейской стране, которую все знают п…
❤1👎1🤔1
Аппка недели прилетела из Южной Кореи. Приложение называется "그늘로" (читается примерно как "Geuneullo" - в переводе значит "в тень"). Это полноценные карты, но строят маршрут они не по самому короткому времени или живописных улочкам, а по зоне с максимальной тенью. Чтобы корейское солнышко поменьше пекло в дороге. Приложение считывает положение солнца в конкретный момент времени, накладывает на это тени от зданий и …
👍11🔥5🤯2👏1🤩1🙈1
Posted without readable text
💯7🙈2👏1🔥1
А знаете, если хотя бы каждый второй высер российских киноделов будет вызывать такое бурление говн в интернетах и так хорошечно развлекать людей своей вычурной конченностью, то мне на такое даже бюджетных денег не жалко (мне в целом их не очень жалко, но тут особенно). "Так обосраться тоже талант иметь надо" (с)
🤣13🤡6👏2❤1🔥1😁1
Posted without readable text
😨4🤮3❤1👍1
Что будет, когда ИИ-пузырь лопнет? У The Hustle вышла именно такая статья. Про термин "ИИ-пузырь" можно бесконечно спорить, но сам материал любопытный, и его считаю нужным разобрать. Итак, начинают с велосипедной метафоры. В 1897 году в Бирмингеме изобрели безопасный велосипед с пневматическими шинами, и город сошёл с ума. Около 400 местных вело-мастерских тут же вышли на биржу, их акции разогнались в 100500 раз, н…
🔥16🤯7👍4❤1👀1🤓1😨1
Posted without readable text
👀18🔥5💋3🤷♀3🥱3🤝2🤮1
Как соскочить с яблочной иглы В июле случилось ещё одно занятное IPO - китайская компания Luxshare вышла на Гонконгскую биржу, собрав рекордные за год (для этой биржи) $3,1 млрд. Кто не в курсе, Luxshare - это один из ключевых сборщиков Айфонов, Airpods и прочих штук от Apple. Не такая глыба как Foxconn, но тоже ого-го - выручка почти $49 млрд за 2025 год. Они даже производство Vision Pro полным циклом освоили (это…
👏21👍6🔥5😁2🤯1🤷♀1
Продукты для микробизнеса - это вообще другой мир Мне скинули интересный проект под названием Wigitel. Они делают сайты для бизнеса, и казалось бы - таких сервисов миллиард, хоть от крупных экосистем, хоть сами по себе, какие хошь. Но Wigitel делает сайты именно для МИКРОбизнеса. И это тот случай, когда узкий сегмент меняет вообще всё внутри продукта - от конфигурации до ценообразования и всей логики продаж. Модел…
👍15🔥11👏4💯3😁2👨💻1🤓1
Помните Ferrari Luce - первый электрокар Феррари, дизайн для которого делали вместе с Джони Айвом? В мае её показали, и тут же огребли цунами хейта. Акции Ferrari даже просели на 6-8% (хотя через неделю отскочили обратно), а экс-глава компании Лука ди Монтедземоло публично заявил, что с машины стоит снять лошадь - мол, не достойна она великого шильдика. Многие СМИ и тг-каналы тогда тоже активно мерились сарказмом. …
🤯21👏11🔥4🤨3💯2👍1👎1
В США сейчас пилят ножовкой стартап за $8 млрд Ночью 29 июля полиция Трои (город в штате Нью-Йорк) повязала 25-летнего чувака с пилой, а рядом с ним была спиленная камера наблюдения. А до этого в городе спилили ещё три такие же. И Троя не исключение - по всей Америке режут и забрызгивают краской камеры одной компании. Можно подумать, что у луддитов началось очередное обострение. Но на самом деле это очень показател…
🔥12👍6👎3👏3🤨3🤗1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Transformerxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 56,308 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ТрансформаторX” (@Transformerxx), 2,573 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Transformerxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.