Channel
@Traficantes_Ed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,295subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001206341624 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Traficantes_Ed |
| Created | 6 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Traficantes_Ed |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 1,295 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 1,293 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 1,293 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (22 May 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,205 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
71 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 54.9% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 29.6% | |
| 💔 | 7 | 9.86% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💥 UNIVERSIDAD DE VERANO 2026 🟠 GRUPO DE LECTURA 1. La abolición de la familia. El capitalismo y la comunalización de los cuidados Sesiones: 15, 22 y 29 de septiembre ✍🏽Programa e inscripciones El libro que abordaremos en este grupo de lectura recorre dos siglos de historia proletaria ejemplificando como la abolición de la familia nunca tuvo un solo significado. 📕 La abolición de la familia. El capitalismo y la co…
❤2🔥1
Raoul Vaneigem (1934-2026) Rest in Power 💔 Nos ha dejado Raoul Vaneigem, filósofo belga y una de las voces más singulares del movimiento situacionista. Junto a Guy Debord fue uno de los teóricos centrales de la Internacional Situacionista. Su obra más conocida, el Tratado del saber vivir para uso de las jóvenes generaciones, se convirtió en uno de los libros de cabecera de Mayo del 68. Desde entonces su obra se cen…
💔7❤6
Una oleada de incendios amenaza nuestra felicidad estival Emmanuel Rodríguez en Zona de Estrategia El episodio que afecta al Sistema Central responde a la combinación de condiciones climáticas extremas y décadas de abandono de los usos tradicionales del monte. La vulnerabilidad actual revela una crisis del modelo territorial y cuestiona tanto la respuesta institucional como la instrumentalización política de la catá…
🔥6
🔥¡YA ESTÁ AQUÍ¡ UNIVERSIDAD DE VERANO 2026 EL IMPERIO CONTRAATACA. Crisis, revuelta y contrarrevolución en Europa Cuatro grupos de lectura durante julio y agosto y sesiones colectivas en septiembre. 🟠 GRUPO 1. La abolición de la familia. El capitalismo y la comunalización de los cuidados Sesiones: 15, 22 y 29 de septiembre ✍🏽Programa e inscripciones 🟢 GRUPO 2. Contra el realismo doméstico. Xenofemonismo, reprodu…
Nic Johnson reseña "Contrarrevolución" de Melinda Cooper. El neoliberalismo como programa para contrarrestar el potencial radical del Estado keynesiano. Mientras Los valores de la familia: Entre el neoliberalismo y el nuevo socialconservadurismo hacía hincapié en las premisas morales de la contraofensiva neoliberal, Contrarrevolución. Economía política de la nueva derecha de Nixon a Trump ofrece una genealogía más …
🔥2
Mario Tronti: Qué hacer o el comunismo posible Roberto Ciccarelli Esta es una de las últimas entrevistas al filósofo y político con motivo de su nonagésimo cumpleaños publicada el año de su muerte en 2023. La izquierda en el Gobierno predica y practica la cohesión social. Hay que darle la vuelta a esto, poner el conflicto social en el centro del terreno de juego. Véase en Traficantes de Sueños El pueblo perdido. L…
❤3🔥1
Sobre Michel Aglietta Cédric Durand Un homenaje al fundador de la heterodoxa Escuela de Regulación parisina, caracterizado por su sorprendente combinación de formación estadística de elite, conceptualizaciones sofisticadas e historia económica de largo alcance. La singular trayectoria de Michel Aglietta, de la radicalización en Argelia y el marxismo de la década de 1960 a los estudios sobre China y la modelización e…
❤5
Joshua Clover / Consideraciones finales sobre Disturbio. Huelga. Disturbio Este artículo forma parte del dossier «The Crisis and the Rift: A Symposium on Joshua Clover’s Riot. Strike. Riot» publicado el 6 de septiembre de 2016 en el sitio web de Viewpoint Magazine. Hoy el disturbio —el motín o la revuelta— puede pensarse como una forma fundamental de lucha de clases y no como un espasmo apolítico; que en él podemos …
🔥1
Podcast | Hasta el c*ñ* de la IA <3. Entrevista con Marga Padilla García 🎧 Estás harta de la IA. De los prompt-bros de LinkedIn, de las formaciones, de hacer más con menos, sueldo y tiempo incluidos. Pero también de la crítica y, en general, de la geopolítica. De los apocalípticos de China. De los apocalípticos de Trump. De los apocalípticos de HAL 9000. Del espectáculo católico-neoliberal que te anima a aumentar la…
❤6
Presentación "Cuidar el vínculo, enfrentar el daño" Esta guía nace de una apuesta política y comunitaria por transformar la manera en que abordamos las violencias machistas. No es un protocolo cerrado, sino una herramienta viva dirigida a organizaciones, profesionales, colectivos, redes de apoyo, instituciones y personas comprometidas con la justicia social que buscan sostener procesos de cuidado, reparación y tran…
❤🔥4
☀️ Ya está aquí XVI Universidad de Verano Anticapitalista ❤️🔥 Una semana de formación, encuentro y cultura para alimentar la organización y el pensamiento estratégico ecosocialista contra el capitalismo y la extrema derecha. 📚Desde la editorial Traficantes de Sueños estaremos presentes con todos nuestros materiales y además este año participamos con una charla sobre La edición como arma política 🎟 Inscripciones …
🔥4
Nuevo número de la New Left Review en español Una poderosa guía de intervención en tiempos incierto 📃 Artículos Kevin Cox: Sudáfrica a la sombra de la historia Anders Stephanson & George Kennan: Cartas Ryan Ruby: Wikipedia y la novela Cédric Durand: Sobre Michel Aglietta Pierre Vesperini: Gobernar el pasado Julieta Caldas: Lujo sin grandeza ✍🏼 Crítica Nic Johnson reseña Contrarrevolución, de Melinda Cooper Grey An…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Traficantes_Ed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 296,410 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Editorial Traficantes de Sueños” (@Traficantes_Ed), 1,295 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Traficantes_Ed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.