#PAXGBTC #1D (Binance Margin) $PAXG looks weak in sats, bearish continuation is in play. https://www.tradingview.com/chart/PAXGBTC/qAEmpGpZ-PAXGBTC-1D-Binance/

Channel
TOR | Trading On Resistance
@TradingOnResistance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001249021128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TradingOnResistance |
| Description | TOR is about bearish charts in Binance Margin market, mostly vs BTC |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TradingOnResistance |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 10 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 10 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 March 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
🛑#RUNE/BTC 1W: SL hit with -1R $RUNE did not stop here and pushed higher in sats, still looks pretty much overbought though. https://www.tradingview.com/x/xcCUuxcK/
⏺#RUNE/BTC 1W (Binance) Descending channel on resistance [SHORT] $RUNE looks topped in sats, a margin short towards 200MA daily would do! https://www.tradingview.com/chart/RUNEBTC/oLzpMZtg-RUNE-BTC-1W-Binance-Descending-channel-on-resistance/
🎯#MKR/BTC 1W (Binance) TP3'd have been reached with +2.57R #Maker got rejected a few more times on supply zone and finally retraced down to ₿0.02 HnS fully played out now, seems like reversal is around the corner, time to buy back it is! $MKR #MKRBTC #DAO makerdao.com https://www.tradingview.com/x/GoU5HB3b/
🔽$PAXG/BTC 3D (#BinanceMargin) Back to supply zone #PaxosGold bounced on 50MA and went retesting the resistance, bearish scenario remains intact though. #PAXG #PAXGBTC #PaxGold #Paxos #Gold #XAU paxos.com /paxgold https://www.tradingview.com/x/eqL48BKC/
🎯$PAXG/BTC 3D (#BinanceMargin) TP1 reached with +22.16% and +1.2R #PaxosGold reversed against Bitcoin as planned and nicely went for first target, let's hope it continues following the arrow! #PAXG #PAXGBTC #PaxGold #Paxos #Gold #XAU paxos.com /paxgold https://www.tradingview.com/x/aptbKHZx/
▶️$PAXG/BTC 3D (#BinanceMargin) Trade active, 2/3 entries filled #PaxosGold is pushing higher and seems to be rejected on upper-line again, scenario is in play. #PAXG #PAXGBTC #PaxGold #Paxos #Gold #XAU paxos.com /paxgold https://www.tradingview.com/x/Yu1HpWaW/
💡$PAXG/BTC 3D (#BinanceMargin) Ascending channel on resistance [SHORT] #PaxosGold just printed an Evening star on Higher TF, which is a strong bearish reversal pattern. A retracement really seems due, let's try again to swing without leverage this time! Current Price= 0.08750 Sell Entry = 0.08967 - 0.09821 Take Profit= 0.0712 | 0.05744 | 0.04175 Stop Loss= 0.11136 Risk/Reward= 1:1.2 | 1:2.1 | 1:3 Expected Profit=…
🎯$MKR/BTC 3D (#BinanceMargin) TP1 was reached with +29.15% (1x) and +1.25R #MakerDAO went down -38.39% before bouncing back and stop hunting us briefly before being rejected again! Now retesting 50MA resistance, we may see another push towards 200MA / supply zone then another move down to TP2. If you are still holding that short, adjusting SL to 0.05712 would be wise since it would likely invalidate the bearish scen…
🛑$PAXG/BTC 1D (#BinanceMargin) SL hit with -22.90% (2x) and -1R #PaxosGold pushed a bit higher than expected and stop hunted us, too bad since it's back to supply zone. First target could still play out, if #Gold price stay stable (1833$ right now) that would mean #Bitcoin around 23.6k 🤞🏼 #PAXG #PAXGBTC #PaxGold #Paxos #XAU paxos.com /paxgold https://www.tradingview.com/x/fKzaSEqa/
🔽$AVAX/BTC 12h (#BinanceMargin) TP3 would have been reached with +47.12% (2x) #Avalanche retraced way more than expected after kicking us out, seems like we should have entered short again! #AVAX #AVAXBTC #AvaxNetwork #AvaLabs #PoS #Staking #SC #DApp #DeFi #BSC #Gaming #AVAXC $WAVAX avax.network avalabs.org @avalanche_announcements @avalancheavax https://www.tradingview.com/x/Xz4jBFBj/
🎯$SCRT/BTC 3D (#BinanceMargin) TP3 reached with +55.48% (1x) and +3.1R #SecretNetwork continued with the correction after losing 100EMA support, that was sharp! #SCRT #SCRTBTC #Privacy #Web3 #SC #NFT #DeFi #Secret #Cosmos scrt.network @SCRTnetwork @scrtcommunity https://www.tradingview.com/x/eKCo9x20/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TradingOnResistance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TOR | Trading On Resistance” (@TradingOnResistance), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradingOnResistance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.