Posted without readable text
💯1🤩1😘1
Signed Inside Ads

Channel
@TradingCryptoTV
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,025subscribers
-115 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002072259855 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TradingCryptoTV |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TradingCryptoTV |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 10,025 | -92 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 10,117 | -23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 10,140 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (29 June 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,002 |
| Reactions total | 90 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
129 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 13.2% | |
| 🎉 | 12 | 9.30% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 8.53% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 7.75% | |
| 🤩 | 9 | 6.98% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 5.43% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 5.43% | |
| 🗿 | 7 | 5.43% | |
| 😘 | 7 | 5.43% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 3.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 3.10% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.775% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
💯1🤩1😘1
Signed Inside Ads
Posted without readable text
🎉1💯1
Signed Inside Ads
¡Obtén tu tarjeta cripto BeeXpay al instante! 💳⚡️ ¿Cansado de los límites bancarios tradicionales? BeeXpay te permite obtener una tarjeta cripto virtual en unos instantes, directamente en Telegram. ✅ Tarjetas virtuales para todas tus compras online ✅ Conversión automática de tus criptos al momento de pagar ✅ Opciones KYC flexibles según tus necesidades Paga con total seguridad y privacidad. 👉 Inicia el bot y crea…
❤🔥2⚡1😈1
⚡️ Sats gratis todos los días LiteBits es una faucet de Bitcoin en Telegram. Sin depósito, sin KYC: reclamas sats gratis cada día y retiras directo por Lightning. 🔥 Bono por racha diaria👥 20% de comisión por tus referidos, para siempre Pruébalo aquí 👉 https://t.me/litebits_faucet_bot/app?startapp=TELEGAES
🤩2❤1🎉1🕊1
Atlas System: crea Smart Cycles y recibe recompensas por la actividad de tu equipo. En Atlas hay dos formas de participar: • Smart Cycle Conecta tu wallet Web3, elige el importe y el plazo del ciclo y aporta ayuda en USDT. Cuando finalice el ciclo, pulsa Claim para solicitar la ayuda disponible junto con la Delta prevista por sus condiciones. • Invite & Earn Invita participantes, desarrolla tu estructura y recibe re…
🔥2🤩2❤1🙈1
🪙 Más Bitcoin Inactivo Durante Años Vuelve a Moverse 📊 Según un analista de CryptoQuant, otros 500 BTC que permanecían inactivos durante más de 10 años y 746 BTC con una antigüedad de 3 a 5 años se han movido en los bloques más recientes. 👀 Los movimientos de Bitcoin que ha permanecido inactivo durante largos periodos suelen ser seguidos de cerca por el mercado, ya que pueden indicar reorganizaciones de billeteras,…
👏2❤🔥1🎉1🥰1🙈1
🪙 Jim Cramer Planea Vender Todo su Bitcoin ⚠️ Jim Cramer afirmó que planea vender todas sus tenencias de Bitcoin, al considerar que los avances en la computación cuántica podrían poner en riesgo la seguridad criptográfica de la red en los próximos tres años. 🖥️ Sus declaraciones reflejan la preocupación de que las futuras computadoras cuánticas puedan llegar a romper los métodos de cifrado actuales, aunque sigue ex…
⚡2🎉1👏1🥰1😎1😘1
🇺🇸 Brian Armstrong Pide al Senado Aprobar el CLARITY Act 🗳️ El CEO de Coinbase, Brian Armstrong, instó al Senado de EE. UU. a votar SÍ al CLARITY Act, afirmando que "Estados Unidos necesita reglas claras para las criptomonedas." 📜 Armstrong sostuvo que un marco regulatorio claro aportaría mayor certidumbre a la industria de los activos digitales y favorecería la innovación en el país.
💯2🔥1🗿1😍1😘1
🤖 La Casa Blanca Reunirá a las Principales Empresas de IA para Revisar un Nuevo Marco de Pruebas 🏛️ La administración Trump se reunirá con OpenAI, Google y Anthropic en la Casa Blanca para revisar un nuevo marco voluntario destinado a evaluar los modelos de inteligencia artificial antes de su lanzamiento. 🧪 La propuesta busca establecer prácticas comunes de pruebas de seguridad antes del despliegue de los modelos, …
😍2⚡1❤1🕊1😎1
⚖️ 25 Estados de EE. UU. Demandan a la Administración Trump por los Aranceles 🇺🇸 Una coalición de 25 estados de EE. UU. presentó una demanda contra la administración Trump, alegando que los nuevos aranceles impuestos a importaciones de 60 socios comerciales son ilegales. 📜 Los estados sostienen que la administración excedió su autoridad legal y buscan bloquear la aplicación de los aranceles ante un tribunal federal
⚡2💯2🕊1🗿1🙈1
🏦 Franklin Templeton se Convierte en Super Validator de Canton Network 🔗 Franklin Templeton se ha convertido en Super Validator de Canton Network, reforzando su compromiso con la infraestructura blockchain para instituciones y los mercados financieros tokenizados. 🏛️ Este paso amplía el papel de la firma en el desarrollo de una infraestructura blockchain segura y regulada, en un contexto de creciente adopción insti…
🔥2😎2❤🔥1🗿1
🛡️ Exsecretario de Defensa de EE. UU. Respalda el CLARITY Act 🇺🇸 El exsecretario de Defensa de Estados Unidos, Mark Esper, calificó el CLARITY Act como una "prioridad de seguridad nacional", al considerar que el liderazgo del país en tecnología financiera está en juego. 📜 Según Esper, establecer un marco regulatorio claro para los activos digitales es clave para preservar la competitividad y la posición estratégica…
🔥3⚡1🎉1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @TradingCryptoTV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💶𝓛𝓪 𝓐𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓣𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓒𝓻𝔂𝓹𝓽𝓸💎” (@TradingCryptoTV), 10,025 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradingCryptoTV.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.