Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📈​ Traders Business School

Channel

📈​ Traders Business School

@Traders_Business_School

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry

6,533subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001361453675
TypeChannel
Username@Traders_Business_School
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Traders_Business_School

Growth

6,5336,6456,5897 August 2026 — 6,645 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,645 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,640 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,614 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,599 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,586 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,567 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,549 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,533 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,516–6,662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 21:586,533-16
24 Aug 2026, 18:536,549-18
20 Aug 2026, 23:446,567-19
17 Aug 2026, 20:486,586-13
14 Aug 2026, 21:136,599-15
11 Aug 2026, 17:516,614-26
8 Aug 2026, 12:386,640-5
8 Aug 2026, 00:006,645no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:566,645first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.95%
avg views ÷ 6,533 subscribers
Avg views / post
454
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.501%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 34 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held37 (28 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total15,430
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

47 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2348.9%
👍1225.5%
👏919.1%
🔥24.26%
🐳12.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC29 viewsread 20 August 2026

✅ La respuesta correcta es que la Bolsa intenta anticipar el futuro Los mercados no valoran solo cómo está la economía hoy, sino cómo creen que estará dentro de unos meses. Por eso la Bolsa puede empezar a subir cuando las noticias todavía son malas… y también caer cuando todo parece ir bien. 📌 Aprendizaje de la semana: la Bolsa no espera a que cambie la economía; intenta anticiparse y poner precio hoy a lo que es

20 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC101 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

¿Por qué puede ocurrir?

  1. Porque el mercado se está equivocando0%
  2. Porque la Bolsa intenta anticipar una mejora futura81%
  3. Porque las noticias ya no importan13%
  4. No lo sé todavía6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC215 viewsread 20 August 2026

Y aquí está una de las claves del trading: no se trata de adivinar si el mercado va a subir o bajar. Se trata de saber qué estás buscando antes de entrar, dónde tiene sentido hacerlo y qué harás si la operación no sale como esperabas. 📚 Precisamente eso es lo que vamos a trabajar en nuestra clase gratuita y en directo de trading, pensada para personas que quieren empezar desde cero y entender cómo funciona realment

19 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC222 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

¿Qué harías?🤔👇🏽

  1. Entraría rápido antes de que siga subiendo7%
  2. Esperaría a que alguien confirme que es una buena entrada22%
  3. Buscaría alguna estrategia que me diga si comprar o vender67%
  4. No sabría realmente qué tendría que mirar antes de entrar15%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC307 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Hola chicos!🙋🏻‍♂️ qué tal ha ido el finde? Os dejamos por aquí un update de como fue la última semana y de las nuevas noticias que nos hemos encontrado 👀👇🏽

2

14 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC515 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

✅ La respuesta correcta es la empresa B Tener un gran producto no es suficiente. Si la dirección se endeuda demasiado o invierte mal el dinero, puede destruir valor. En cambio, una buena gestión puede hacer crecer el negocio de forma sostenible. 📌 Aprendizaje de la semana: una buena empresa no siempre es una buena inversión. También importa quién la dirige y cómo toma sus decisiones.

👍6

14 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC476 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Después de unos años, ¿cuál crees que puede ser una mejor inversión?

  1. La empresa A, porque crece más0%
  2. La empresa B, aunque crezca menos94%
  3. Las dos por igual6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

13 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC424 viewsread 20 August 2026

Vale, viendo las respuestas, para los que todavía no habéis comprado vuestra primera acción o para quienes lo tenéis aparcado y queréis retomar o mejorar 👀 Os dejamos algo que os puede venir muy bien Hemos preparado un tutorial donde podéis ver cómo invertir en acciones desde cero y hacer una compra paso a paso, para que veáis cómo funciona todo en la práctica. Podéis verlo aquí👇🏽 https://www.tradersbusinessschoo

13 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC390 viewsread 20 August 2026

Y si nunca habéis comprado una acción, decidlo también, que nos interesa saber cuántos estáis todavía en ese punto 🙌🏻

13 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC415 viewsread 20 August 2026

Chicos, una pregunta 👀 ¿Cuándo fue la última vez que invertisteis en acciones y cómo lo hicisteis? Contadnos un poco: qué acción comprasteis, desde qué plataforma, si fue fácil, si os liasteis con algo… 👇🏽 Os leemos‼️

12 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC451 viewsread 20 August 2026

Si no tenéis claro cuándo entrar, cuándo salir o qué mirar antes de operar, tranquilos: eso es justo lo que veremos esta tarde. 📚 En nuestra clase gratuita y en directo de trading aprenderás las bases para empezar a entender el mercado y tomar decisiones con más criterio. Las plazas son limitadas, pero aún puedes apuntarte. No te lo pierdas!!! 👇🏽 🔗 https://landing.tradersbusinessschool.com/trading/?utm_source=bbdd

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Traders_Business_School. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

¿Por qué puede ocurrir?

  1. Porque el mercado se está equivocando0%
  2. Porque la Bolsa intenta anticipar una mejora futura81%
  3. Porque las noticias ya no importan13%
  4. No lo sé todavía6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

¿Qué harías?🤔👇🏽

  1. Entraría rápido antes de que siga subiendo7%
  2. Esperaría a que alguien confirme que es una buena entrada22%
  3. Buscaría alguna estrategia que me diga si comprar o vender67%
  4. No sabría realmente qué tendría que mirar antes de entrar15%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

14 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Después de unos años, ¿cuál crees que puede ser una mejor inversión?

  1. La empresa A, porque crece más0%
  2. La empresa B, aunque crezca menos94%
  3. Las dos por igual6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

¿Qué harías?🤔

  1. Entraría rápido antes de que siga subiendo28%
  2. Buscaría algún video o alguien que me diga que hacer8%
  3. Compraría porque parece que “va para arriba”28%
  4. No sabría cómo decidir cuándo entrar o salir42%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

¿Qué es lo que más os frena?

  1. No sé por dónde empezar32%
  2. Me da miedo equivocarme32%
  3. No sé usar una plataforma28%
  4. Creo que necesito mucho dinero32%

The shares total 124%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Después de las 10 inversiones, ¿quién ha conseguido un mejor resultado?

  1. El inversor A, porque gana en 8 de cada 1015%
  2. Los dos consiguen el mismo resultado3%
  3. El inversor B, aunque gana menos veces80%
  4. No lo sé todavía3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📈​ Traders Business School” (@Traders_Business_School), 6,533 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Traders_Business_School.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.