Lo importante es entender cómo gestionar esas pérdidas y seguir unas reglas, en lugar de cambiar todo cada vez que algo sale mal. Hoy lo veremos desde cero en nuestra clase gratuita y en directo de trading‼️ Además, podéis plantear vuestras dudas directamente a los profesores durante la clase. 🔗 PINCHA AQUÍ Y RESERVA TU PLAZA ⚠️ Plazas limitadas

Channel
📈 Traders Business School
@Traders_Business_School
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
6,224subscribers
-421 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001361453675 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Traders_Business_School |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Traders_Business_School |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:34 | 6,224 | -22 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:29 | 6,246 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 6,261 | -18 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:47 | 6,279 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 6,296 | -12 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 6,308 | -13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:05 | 6,321 | -13 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 6,334 | -24 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 10:49 | 6,358 | -24 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 12:41 | 6,382 | -36 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 02:36 | 6,418 | -38 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 6,456 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 6,471 | -26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 6,497 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:45 | 6,522 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 6,530 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 6,533 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 6,549 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 6,567 | -19 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 6,586 | first reading |
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.99%
- avg views ÷ 6,224 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 373
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.186%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 59 (28 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 8,204 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
51 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 51.0% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 25.5% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 17.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Hola Chicos!👋🏼 Hay un error bastante común cuando empiezas con trading: Pensar que necesitas acertar prácticamente todas las operaciones para hacerlo bien. Y cuando llegan dos o tres operaciones malas seguidas, empiezan las dudas: 🚀¿Lo estaré haciendo mal? 🚀¿Tengo que cambiar de estrategia? 🚀¿Este sistema ya no funciona? Pero perder operaciones forma parte del trading
✅ La respuesta correcta es: depende del precio que paguemos. Una empresa puede ser increíble… y aun así ser una mala inversión si pagamos demasiado por ella. Y una empresa menos llamativa puede tener más sentido si su precio está suficientemente por debajo de su valor. Precisamente de esto va el Value Investing: no solo de encontrar buenas empresas, sino de saber cuánto tiene sentido pagar por ellas. Hoy tenemos …
¿Cuál sería mejor inversión?
- La empresa A14%
- La empresa B71%
- Depende del precio que paguemos14%
- No sabría decidirlo0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Hola chicos! Para los nuevos 🙌🏼 Terminamos la semana dejándoos algo que os puede venir muy bien si todavía estáis dando vuestros primeros pasos. Hemos preparado una guía para empezar a invertir paso a paso, donde explicamos de forma sencilla qué deberíais tener claro antes de empezar. Nada de complicarlo más de la cuenta 😅 Si todavía tenéis dudas sobre por dónde empezar, guardadla para verla con calma este finde …
✅La respuesta correcta es: no se puede saber solo con esos datos. Porque acertar muchas veces no significa necesariamente ganar dinero. Una estrategia puede tener muchas operaciones ganadoras, pero perder muchísimo cada vez que falla. Y otra puede acertar menos veces, pero ganar bastante más cuando acierta de lo que pierde cuando falla. A esto se le llama esperanza matemática. 📌 Aprendizaje de la semana: no mire…
¿Cuál crees que es mejor?
- La A, porque acierta mucho más13%
- La B7%
- No se puede saber solo con esos datos80%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Hoy tenemos una clase gratuita y en directo de trading donde veremos desde cero cómo empezar a entender todo esto y por qué tener unas reglas claras es tan importante. Además, podéis aprovechar la clase para preguntar directamente a los profesores 🙌🏼 🔗 https://www.tradersbusinessschool.com/aprende-invertir-trading/?utm_source=bbdd&utm_medium=telegram&utm_campaign=compra_etf_fondos&utm_content=ES_Webinar-Acciones_LI…
Chicos, hoy hablamos de algo que pasa muchísimo cuando empiezas con trading 👀 Puedes aprender a mirar gráficos, identificar movimientos e incluso encontrar posibles entradas. Pero si antes de abrir una operación no sabes: 🔴 ¿Qué tendría que pasar para entrar? 🔴 ¿Cuánto estoy dispuesto a arriesgar? 🔴 ¿Dónde saldría si me equivoco? 🔴 ¿Y dónde saldría si va bien? En realidad, todavía no tienes un plan.
Hoy tenemos la primera clase gratuita y en directo de Value Investing donde veremos cómo analizar una empresa con números y entender mejor la relación entre la calidad del negocio y el precio que pagamos. Veremos todo desde cero y sin complicarlo más de la cuenta‼️ 🔗 https://landing.tradersbusinessschool.com/value-investing/ ⚠️ Plazas limitadas
❤1
Chicos, hay una idea que puede ahorrar muchos errores cuando empiezas a invertir 👀 Una gran empresa no siempre es una gran inversión. Puedes encontrar un negocio top, con buenos resultados, una marca fuerte y crecimiento… Pero si pagas demasiado por él, la inversión puede no tener sentido. Por eso, antes de comprar una acción, no basta con preguntarse: “¿Es una buena empresa?” También hay que preguntarse: “¿Est…
Si te ha pasado o te pasa, hoy tenemos una clase gratuita y en directo sobre invertir en acciones, desde cero, paso a paso‼️ Además, podéis preguntar todas vuestras dudas directamente a los profesores 🙌🏼 🔗 https://www.tradersbusinessschool.com/aprende-invertir-acciones/ Las plazas son limitadas🚀
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @Traders_Business_School. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 15 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Cuál sería mejor inversión?
- La empresa A14%
- La empresa B71%
- Depende del precio que paguemos14%
- No sabría decidirlo0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Cuál crees que es mejor?
- La A, porque acierta mucho más13%
- La B7%
- No se puede saber solo con esos datos80%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Te ha pasado?
- Si87%
- No13%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Por qué puede estar ocurriendo esto?
- Porque una subida de tipos significa que las empresas venden menos automáticamente11%
- Porque los beneficios que la empresa espera generar en el futuro valen menos a día de hoy63%
- Porque cuando suben los tipos, todas las empresas empiezan a perder dinero16%
- Porque los tipos de interés no afectan al valor de las empresas11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Qué conclusión sacarías?
- Las dos son igual de rentables porque tienen el mismo beneficio18%
- La Empresa A convierte mejor sus resultados en efectivo68%
- La Empresa B es mejor porque genera menos caja5%
- El beneficio es lo único importante para valorar una empresa9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Por qué puede ocurrir?
- Porque el mercado se está equivocando0%
- Porque la Bolsa intenta anticipar una mejora futura81%
- Porque las noticias ya no importan13%
- No lo sé todavía6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📈 Traders Business School” (@Traders_Business_School), 6,224 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Traders_Business_School.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.