Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -3,690. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,823–54,620 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 12:16
50,376
-439
18 Sept 2026, 22:40
50,815
-132
16 Sept 2026, 11:40
50,947
-128
14 Sept 2026, 15:41
51,075
-88
13 Sept 2026, 01:58
51,163
-162
11 Sept 2026, 02:36
51,325
-210
8 Sept 2026, 06:19
51,535
-337
5 Sept 2026, 04:59
51,872
-147
3 Sept 2026, 09:56
52,019
-101
2 Sept 2026, 00:35
52,120
-72
31 Aug 2026, 23:36
52,192
-96
30 Aug 2026, 21:25
52,288
-94
29 Aug 2026, 22:04
52,382
-53
29 Aug 2026, 00:59
52,435
-106
27 Aug 2026, 21:43
52,541
-63
26 Aug 2026, 18:16
52,604
-88
25 Aug 2026, 18:25
52,692
-34
24 Aug 2026, 20:06
52,726
-173
23 Aug 2026, 07:47
52,899
-91
21 Aug 2026, 18:17
52,990
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.746%
avg views ÷ 50,376 subscribers
Avg views / post
376
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.231%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held
67 (25 July 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total
6,762
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈7,010
Videos
≈100
Links
≈3,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
38
58.5%
🔥
11
16.9%
👍
9
13.8%
🎉
3
4.62%
👏
2
3.08%
😁
2
3.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟠 Thời buổi kinh tế khó khăn ngoài trade ra , anh em nào muốn kiếm thêm tiền thì nhắn cho mình , mình sẽ hướng dẫn ae làm Affiliate Vàng ( tuyển IB ) nghề này kiếm tiền củng ổn , làm miễn phí hết 100%
💵 Ưu điểm khi làm , tiền tươi về mỗi ngày
- Thích làm giờ nào thì làm ko ép
- Chỉ cần chịu khó học hỏi , kiên trì ít hôm , nghiên cứu mấy cái mình chỉ dạy là xong
- Ko hiểu sẽ được hướng dẫn tận tình
- Nhắc lại Cái này…
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Anh em lưu ý Sẽ có lúc mình ít call lệnh Trade trên Telegram này vì phải còn quản nhìu nhóm khác và Soi Chart call lệnh , nhưng ở nhóm VIP vẫn có lệnh thường xuyên mỗi ngày , anh em muốn lấy kèo mỗi ngày thì vào nhé
✅ Ưu điểm khi vào nhóm VIP ( Nhóm Miễn Phí )
- Có nhìu lệnh , Ăn nhiều kèo TO Hơn
- Có các buổi đào tạo chia sẽ kiến thức , giúp anh em tối ưu lợi nhuận và quản lý rủi ro tốt hơn
- Chỉ cần anh em đ…
📣 Tóm tắt Cuộc họp FOMC ngày 16/09/2026
• Fed tăng lãi suất lên 4,0%, với sự đồng thuận 12–0.
• 16/18 quan chức dự báo sẽ tăng thêm ít nhất 1 lần trong năm nay.
• Lạm phát còn cao, trong khi kinh tế và việc làm vẫn ổn định.
• Fed chưa chốt bước đi tiếp theo; mọi quyết định vẫn phụ thuộc vào dữ liệu
🇺🇸 TRUMP: Ông Trump cho rằng lãi suất của Hoa Kỳ nên là 1% hoặc thấp hơn, vì Hoa Kỳ có xếp hạng tín dụng tốt nhất thế giới và đang "ủng hộ" các quốc gia khác.
"HẠ LÃI SUẤT CHO HOA KỲ, VÀ NGAY LẬP TỨC!"
🟠⚪️ Giá vàng và bạc giao ngay chạm mốc thấp nhất trong 5 tuần qua
🔽 Sáng ngày 14/9 là phiên giảm của vàng chạm mốc 4,310 USD/ounce tương đương 0.87% sụt giảm, giá bạc thậm chí còn sụt giảm mạnh hơn về mốc 63,22 USD/ounce, tương đương 1,9%.
- Các nguyên nhân chính được xác nhận là do khả năng FED sẽ tăng lãi suất trong cuộc họp 15-16/9 sắp tới đã nâng lên 87% sau khi các dữ liệu lạm phát (CPI) tăng nóng hơn dữ báo c…
🕯 Công bố chỉ số CPI tháng 8/2026
- Lạm phát CPI thực tế: 3,4%
Dự báo: 3,4% - Kỳ trước: 3,4%
- Lạm phát CPI lõi thực tế: 2,4%
Dự báo: 2,4% - Kỳ trước: 2,5%
🔼 Thị trường đã đảo chiều nhanh chóng mặc dù dữ liệu CPI đẩy kỳ vọng về việc Fed tăng lãi suất vào tuần tới lên mức 90%.
Hợp đồng tương lai chứng khoán Mỹ, vàng và Bitcoin đều sụt giảm mạnh trước khi dữ liệu CPI được công bố, nhưng đã bật tăng trở lại vùng tíc…
🔥 10 ngày sắp tới sẽ cực kỳ quan trọng, đánh dấu cục diện của thị trường tháng 9 !
10/09 - Chỉ số giá sản xuất (PPI): Bài kiểm tra lạm phát đầu tiên. PPI đo lường sự thay đổi giá từ phía nhà sản xuất.
11/09 - Chỉ số giá tiêu dùng (CPI): Nếu CPI cao hơn mức 3,4% của tháng 7, kịch bản Fed duy trì hoặc tăng lãi suất gần như sẽ được xác nhận.
15/09 - Bỏ phiếu Đạo luật CLARITY: Thượng viện Mỹ sẽ tổ chức bỏ phiếu thủ tụ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @TradeVang86. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TradeVang86 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NHẬT KÝ TRADE VÀNG 🏆” (@TradeVang86), 50,376 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradeVang86.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.