Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Trade Cortex™

Channel

Trade Cortex™

@TradeCortexTM

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

38,590subscribers

-1,655 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001215834171
TypeChannel
Username@TradeCortexTM
DescriptionTelegram Channel Disclaimer: nothing said by the administrators should be construed as financial advice, do your own DD/research #TraderCash
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/TradeCortexTM

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

38,59040,24539,417.56 August 2026 — 40,245 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,245 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,190 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,111 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,983 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,928 subscribers13 August 2026 — 39,877 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39,818 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,761 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,659 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,597 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,539 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,500 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,473 subscribers22 August 2026 — 39,430 subscribers24 August 2026 — 39,325 subscribers25 August 2026 — 39,277 subscribers26 August 2026 — 39,225 subscribers27 August 2026 — 39,199 subscribers28 August 2026 — 39,173 subscribers29 August 2026 — 39,142 subscribers30 August 2026 — 39,095 subscribers31 August 2026 — 39,036 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,988 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,949 subscribers3 September 2026 — 38,871 subscribers5 September 2026 — 38,786 subscribers8 September 2026 — 38,590 subscribers6 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 33 days, net -1,655. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,342–40,493 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 17:3738,590-196
5 Sept 2026, 10:5738,786-85
3 Sept 2026, 12:3738,871-78
2 Sept 2026, 08:4238,949-39
1 Sept 2026, 10:5538,988-48
31 Aug 2026, 11:4539,036-59
30 Aug 2026, 11:4439,095-47
29 Aug 2026, 14:5439,142-31
28 Aug 2026, 15:0839,173-26
27 Aug 2026, 16:5739,199-26
26 Aug 2026, 16:5439,225-52
25 Aug 2026, 15:5439,277-48
24 Aug 2026, 16:4539,325-105
22 Aug 2026, 22:1339,430-43
21 Aug 2026, 13:1639,473-27
20 Aug 2026, 10:1539,500-39
19 Aug 2026, 13:3639,539-58
18 Aug 2026, 16:1739,597-62
17 Aug 2026, 12:4639,659-102
16 Aug 2026, 03:3739,761first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.6%
avg views ÷ 38,590 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held33 (3 July 20267 September 2026)
Views total153,650
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
810
Videos
3
Links
256

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 20:19 UTC≈12,300 viewsread 9 September 2026

#BTC Potential Long Setup Update I updated the trade idea to reflect a safer scaled-in approach, splitting our entry into two distinct confluence levels to optimize the average entry and risk-to-reward ratio. 📊 First Entry: 77498.9 📊 Second Entry (DCA): 76383.7 🛑 Invdation Level: 74603.0 🎯 Potential Reaction Area 1: 80666.2 🎯 Potential Reaction Area 2: 83653.0 🎯 Potential Reaction Area 3: 89993.2 Pulling the sec

6 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 9 September 2026

Hi Vikranth, Appreciate you reaching out. Here is the updated short-m setup and structure for SNDK Following up on the daily and 8-hour structures, SNDK has met key resistance near the top of its macro range and is developing a clean breakdown setup. 📊 Primary Resistance Level: 1805.57 📊 Key Point of Control (POC): 1729.96 🎯 Primary Target Area for Short: 1325.00 🎯 Secondary Liquidity Target: 1015.00 Price test

6 Sept 2026, 00:35 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 September 2026

Hi Prakash, Truly appreciate the kind words and support. Patience and waiting for the right levels always pay off over rushing into the market. Here is the updated long-m spot analysis for ASTER what i would do: Looking at the weekly timeframe, ASTER is consolidating in a macro base structure af its initial expansion and retrace. 📊 Buy Area (Primary Limit): 0.5346 📊 Secondary Support Level: 0.2265 (If 0.5346 fail

5 Sept 2026, 20:09 UTC≈11,700 viewsread 9 September 2026

#BTC Potential Long Setup Looking at the 4-hour structure, Bitcoin is holding strong above key higher-timeframe support, but price action suggests a local liquidity sweep could occur before the next major expansion phase. 📊 Area of Inest: 78097.6 🛑 Invdation Level: 76918.6 🎯 Potential Reaction Area 1: 80666.2 🎯 Potential Reaction Area 2: 83653.0 🎯 Potential Reaction Area 3: 89993.2 The 78097.6 region sits right

2 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC≈12,300 viewsread 9 September 2026

#BTC Potential Limit Order 📈 First of all, thank you to everyone who took the time to vote. 🙏 I completely understand the outcome and I've always believed that the bet person should win. Looking back, I also know that I wasn't as active as I normally am because of a longer vacation and a few weddings I was invited to. That being said, September is a new month and I plan to be much more focused on bringing you valu

28 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Hi Venkatesh, I'm sorry, but you need to mention #TraderCash so that I can fil easily. For your question, I'm not sure about your entry, but for safety, I would accumulate around 69k if the market allows otherwise, you don't have any reason to close the trade for now, as we don't lose the structure. Cheers #TraderCash

26 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 September 2026

#BTC Update i will Remove the Invdation Level (SL) and look for the Reaction on my Entry. A Potential DCA will placed if i see a good reaction but i will update you. i don't want to become a Victim of a Liq. hunt. Cheers #TraderCash

26 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 September 2026

#BTC Potential Long Setup This is one of the areas I'm personally watching closely. 📊 Area of Inest: 77402.7 🛑 Invdation Level: 76083.6 🎯Potential Reaction Area 1: 79444.6 🎯Potential Reaction Area 2: 82111.3🎯Potential Reaction Area 3: 84134.1 The reason this area caught my attention is because BTC appears to have made a fakeout below the median line of the parallel channel. At the same time, we have an nPOC and V

22 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

#JTO Update Target 1 has been officially hit. The price held the support base around 0.5872 exactly as planned and pushed cleanly into our first reaction area at 0.6766. The risk-to-reward ratio on this setup played out nicely, with buyers stepping in from the entry zone to initiate the recovery. Now we observe how price action handles this current level as we keep our eyes on the next target areas ahead. SL af t

21 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈9,350 viewsread 9 September 2026

#BTC Higher Timeframe Update A while ago, I shared this higher timeframe idea and I remember that some people thought it was unrestic. That's completely fine. Different views are what make a market. What I want you to notice is not that a target was called, but how the path was mapped out before it happened. The idea was simple. BTC needed to break 64500, then 71k became likely. Af that, the market had enough room

19 Aug 2026, 20:48 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 September 2026
Photo

#NEAR Update Perfect Prediction, with a sniper Entry who takes it?, personally i en that Long now with 3x as it gave nice Confirmation. All those i shared on Q&A Weeks ago, you can see how helpful it is. Cheers #TraderCash

19 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC≈12,200 viewsread 9 September 2026

#BTC Update The move played out exactly as predicted. Af catching that bounce from the lower support region, Bitcoin broke out of the local tight range and pushed directly toward the upper channel boundary, reaching into the 69850 zone. Now we are watching key structural confirmation levels to demine the next leg: Key Support (66550): As long as Bitcoin holds above the 66550 zone on pulls back, the immediate bulli

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @TradeCortexTM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@TradeCortexTM edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trade Cortex™” (@TradeCortexTM), 38,590 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TradeCortexTM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.