Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Israel Genocide Tracker

@TrackingIsraeliGenocide

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22,714subscribers

-66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002347249330
TypeChannel
Username@TrackingIsraeliGenocide
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TrackingIsraeliGenocide

Growth

22,71422,78022,7476 August 2026 — 22,780 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,772 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,761 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,751 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,747 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,733 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,722 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,714 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,704–22,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:1722,714-8
12 Aug 2026, 13:0522,722-11
11 Aug 2026, 10:4422,733-14
10 Aug 2026, 11:2022,747-4
9 Aug 2026, 09:1222,751-10
8 Aug 2026, 11:2422,761-11
7 Aug 2026, 10:3322,772-8
6 Aug 2026, 18:0422,780first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 12 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 22,714 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,710
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held21 (12 April 202613 August 2026)
Views total5,410
Reactions total250
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 02s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,418 reactions across 21 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬2,52357.1%
🤮46910.6%
🖕3237.31%
👏2716.13%
💩2305.21%
1212.74%
🤣1182.67%
😈531.20%
😢481.09%
🍾360.815%
🏆290.656%
🎉230.521%
👎230.521%
🤯230.521%
💔200.453%
😁190.43%
😭120.272%
🥰120.272%
🔥100.226%
🆒80.181%
18 further kinds471.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,418reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC≈1,130 views77 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

As revenge for Harel Birenstock, a 55th Brigade commander who died last week in an unexplained explosion while rigging displaced Lebanese homes in Majdal Zoun, another company wiped out dozens of homes last night and shared the footage with his family in dedication to his soul.

💩38🤬196🏆5👏3👍2🖕1🤮1

21 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC≈4,280 views173 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Southern Lebanon this week: the daily Israeli annihilation of what's left is ongoing.

🤬111👏22🤮12🖕7😢6🔥4😈4🤯3

10 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC≈7,000 views220 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Israeli soldiers carry out daily raids on civilians near their bases in Syria, looting and confiscating property while documenting it on socials.

🤬133🖕25🤮1915👏8🤣8💩5🦄4

28 Jun 2026, 18:31 UTC≈7,700 views254 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Gaza's schools were the final structures detonated during Israel's systematic annihilation of neighborhoods. Israeli units used them as operational bases before ultimately blowing them up once the mission was complete.

🤬145😢2618👏16🤮16🖕11🤣10💩7

26 Jun 2026, 20:14 UTC≈6,370 views173 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Following the death of his fellow terrorist, an Israeli contractor who was paid to demolish Gaza has reuploaded footage of their work, seemingly to reinvoke their mission. In this clip, they briefly documented themselves destroying one of Gaza's gas stations during the genocide.

💩64🤬41🤮23👏21🖕12😈82🍾1

25 Jun 2026, 20:20 UTC≈5,280 views142 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Israel's annihilation of displaced Lebanese villages continues.

🤬83👏17🤮13🖕10🍾5💩4🍓3😭3

15 Jun 2026, 20:11 UTC≈7,170 views216 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Israeli soldiers posted footage today of the uninterrupted demolition of displaced Lebanese homes in southern Lebanon, joking as they defy the so-called US-Iran deal that supposedly required Israel to stop such actions in Lebanon.

🤬144👏21🖕20💩10😈7🤮63🤯2

9 Jun 2026, 18:30 UTC≈7,730 views291 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Graphic: Israeli drone operators haunted this unarmed Palestinian until bombing him, making sure to fully document it and post it to their socials. Khan Younis, Hamad City invasion, April 2024.

🤬190🤣29🤮25👏13🖕13😭9😱4🆒4

8 Jun 2026, 18:21 UTC≈6,920 views191 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Since day one of the ceasefire, Israel has never stopped wiping out neighborhoods in Gaza. This documentation from yesterday follows the recent expansion of the so-called "yellow line" as it pushes deeper into populated blocks.

🤬124👏22🖕16🤮12🤣4🏆3😈32

1 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC≈9,710 views257 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Israeli soldiers being themselves in southern Lebanon, looting displaced Lebanese homes before either setting them on fire or wiping them off the map.

🤬123🖕46🤣25🤮20💩13😈9🍾8👏4

21 May 2026, 19:47 UTC≈9,350 views299 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

An Israeli unit's "homecoming" party featured a display of their well-documented annihilation of southern Lebanon's villages, met with cheers and laughter from crowds of soldiers, their relatives, and family members. It is a scene impossible to see anywhere but Israel.

🤮131🤬75👏23🖕21😈1211🍾9👎7

14 May 2026, 19:49 UTC≈8,090 views223 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

Israeli units have begun today demolishing homes and tents that Palestinians had returned to after the ceasefire, as Israel pushes its ceasefire lines deeper into Gaza.

🤬140🤮36🏆16👎7👏7💩5😈43

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @TrackingIsraeliGenocide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 195,573 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Israel Genocide Tracker” (@TrackingIsraeliGenocide), 22,714 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrackingIsraeliGenocide.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.