Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NFT Traders

Supergroup

NFT Traders

@Tr4degc

Has discussion group2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

1,612members

-202 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

86 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003851036379
TypeSupergroup
Usernames@nfttraders @Tr4degc
DescriptionThe #1 Community NFT Chat! Market: @tr4degc Store : @tr4deway 📖 Rules: t.me/tr4derules/2 @NTSupBot - Support Bot NT Network: https://t.me/addlist/89n7BssLFLk5ODQ9 Provided by @tr4derz
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 September 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held31
On Telegramt.me/Tr4degc

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5171,8451,6817 August 2026 — 1,814 members8 August 2026 — 1,810 members8 August 2026 — 1,810 members8 August 2026 — 1,808 members11 August 2026 — 1,797 members12 August 2026 — 1,807 members14 August 2026 — 1,817 members15 August 2026 — 1,810 members17 August 2026 — 1,816 members19 August 2026 — 1,826 members20 August 2026 — 1,827 members22 August 2026 — 1,828 members24 August 2026 — 1,824 members25 August 2026 — 1,821 members26 August 2026 — 1,833 members29 August 2026 — 1,835 members29 August 2026 — 1,836 members1 September 2026 — 1,841 members1 September 2026 — 1,841 members4 September 2026 — 1,845 members4 September 2026 — 1,842 members9 September 2026 — 1,843 members9 September 2026 — 1,843 members13 September 2026 — 1,517 members13 September 2026 — 1,522 members17 September 2026 — 1,548 members17 September 2026 — 1,557 members25 September 2026 — 1,610 members26 September 2026 — 1,610 members27 September 2026 — 1,612 members27 September 2026 — 1,612 members1,6127 August 202627 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 50 days, net -202. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,468–1,894 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
27 Sept 2026, 00:071,612no change
27 Sept 2026, 00:011,612+2
26 Sept 2026, 02:431,610no change
25 Sept 2026, 09:571,610+53
17 Sept 2026, 16:161,557+9
17 Sept 2026, 01:201,548+26
13 Sept 2026, 09:151,522+5
13 Sept 2026, 06:411,517-326
9 Sept 2026, 18:591,843no change
9 Sept 2026, 18:581,843+1
4 Sept 2026, 21:171,842-3
4 Sept 2026, 16:381,845+4
1 Sept 2026, 09:421,841no change
1 Sept 2026, 08:521,841+5
29 Aug 2026, 17:421,836+1
29 Aug 2026, 03:281,835+2
26 Aug 2026, 15:541,833+12
25 Aug 2026, 22:321,821-3
24 Aug 2026, 00:121,824-4
22 Aug 2026, 14:021,828first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT Traders” (@Tr4degc), 1,612 members as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tr4degc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.