Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 25 days, net +132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,047–9,273 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 13:55
9,205
+49
12 Sept 2026, 05:18
9,156
-31
7 Sept 2026, 20:40
9,187
-5
2 Sept 2026, 19:55
9,192
-43
30 Aug 2026, 23:25
9,235
-12
28 Aug 2026, 00:27
9,247
+74
25 Aug 2026, 04:14
9,173
+99
21 Aug 2026, 13:35
9,074
+1
21 Aug 2026, 11:15
9,073
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.5%
avg views ÷ 9,205 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
48 (18 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
34,748
Reactions total
729
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
53m 44s
Average length
53m 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,482 reactions across 48 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
620
41.8%
🔥
340
22.9%
👍
149
10.1%
👏
105
7.09%
🤩
77
5.20%
💯
63
4.25%
😍
52
3.51%
🎉
48
3.24%
😁
14
0.945%
🥰
14
0.945%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,482 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 48 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TopikAcademy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇰🇷Ushbu qo‘llanmada koreys tilidagi o‘qish qoidalari tushunarli va eslab qolish oson bo‘lgan misollar bilan jamlangan
Qo‘llanma orqali so‘zlarning qanday yozilishi va qanday talaffuz qilinishini misollar yordamida solishtirib o‘rganishingiz mumkin.
📌 Saqlab qo‘ying va koreys tilini endi o‘rganishni endi boshlagan do’stlaringizga jo’natib qo’ying!
🚀Telegram | 🎬YouTube | 📷Instagram | 🛫 Janubiy Koreyada o’qish
📚 결손 / 결함 / 결핍 / 결점
O‘xshash ma’noga ega bo‘lsa-da, bu so‘zlar turli vaziyatlarda ishlatiladi 👇
🔹결손 — yetishmaslik, biror narsaning yo‘qligi
( bilim, mablag‘, inson yoki zarur elementning yetishmasligi)
📌 지식의 결손 — bilimdagi bo‘shliq
🔹결함 — nuqson, defekt
( asosan mahsulot, texnika yoki tizimdagi nuqson haqida)
📌제품에 결함이 있다 — mahsulotda nuqson bor
🔹결핍 — tanqislik, yetishmovchilik
( organizm yoki jamiyatda biror narsa…
📚 -아/어 가지다
☑️ biror ishni bajarib, uning natijasini o‘zida saqlab qolmoq / olib yurmoq yoki bir holatni davom ettirmoq.
📎 Tuzilishi: Fe’l + 아/어 가지다
만들다 - 만들어 가지다
배우다 - 배워 가지다
모으다 - 모아 가지다
준비하다 - 준비해 가지다
✨Misollar
📌 한국어를 열심히 공부해 가지고 한국에 가고 싶어요.
Koreys tilini astoydil o‘rganib, keyin Koreyaga bormoqchiman.
📌 필요한 자료를 준비해 가지고 오세요.
Kerakli materiallarni tayyorlab, olib keling.
📌 돈을 조금씩 모아 가지고 여행을 갔어요.
Pulni oz-o…
💙마음을 사로잡다
✔️ yurakni zabt etmoq, qalbini o‘ziga rom qilmoq, qattiq ta’sirlantirmoq.
✨활용 표현:
사람의 마음을 사로잡다 — inson qalbini zabt etmoq
대중의 마음을 사로잡다 — ommaning qalbini rom etmoq
관객의 마음을 사로잡다 — tomoshabinlarni o‘ziga jalb qilmoq
📌예문:
그의 따뜻한 미소가 사람들의 마음을 사로잡았다.
Uning samimiy tabassumi odamlarning qalbini zabt etdi.
Agar foydali bo‘lsa, do'stlaringiz bilan ulashishni unutmang 🤝
🚀Telegram | 🎬YouTube | 📷Instagram | 🛫…
🇰🇷Ushbu qo‘llanmada koreys tilidagi o‘qish qoidalari tushunarli va eslab qolish oson bo‘lgan misollar bilan jamlangan
Qo‘llanma orqali so‘zlarning qanday yozilishi va qanday talaffuz qilinishini misollar yordamida solishtirib o‘rganishingiz mumkin.
📌 Saqlab qo‘ying va koreys tilini endi o‘rganishni endi boshlagan do’stlaringizga jo’natib qo’ying!
🚀Telegram | 🎬YouTube | 📷Instagram | 🛫 Janubiy Koreyada o’qish
🇰🇷빨래방 va 세탁소 — farqi nimada?
Ikkala so‘z ham kir yuvish joyi bilan bog‘liq, ammo ma’nosi biroz farq qiladi👇
빨래방 — o‘z-o‘ziga xizmat ko‘rsatadigan kir yuvish joyi
Bu yerda kirlaringizni o‘zingiz kir yuvish mashinasiga solib, yuvib va quritib olasiz.
📎Misol:
빨래방에서 옷을 빨았어요.
Kirxonada kiyimlarimni yuvdim.
세탁소 — professional kimyoviy tozalash / kir yuvish xizmati
Bu yerda kiyimingizni xodimga topshirasiz va ular un…
🎉TOPIK ACADEMY 2026-yilgi 107-chi TOPIK imtihonida erishgan yuksak natijalar! 🇰🇷📚
🚀2-chi Qism😉
Bizning TOPIK ACADEMY o’quvchilarimiz tajribali va mehnatsevar ustozlarimiz boshchiligida yana bir bor yuqori darajadagi bilimlarini isbotlashdi! 🏆
🎓 Muattarxon 선생님 — TOPIK 5급
🎓 Sug'diyona 학생 — TOPIK 4급
🎓 Nozima 학생 — TOPIK 4급
🎓 Nodira 학생 — TOPIK 3급
🎓 Shirin 학생 — TOPIK 2급
🎓 Zaxriddin 학생 — TOPIK 1급
🚀 Va bu hali hammasi em…
✔️ TOPIK lug‘ati — 5 ta muhim mavzu
Ushbu faylda TOPIK imtihonida uchraydigan 5 ta muhim mavzu bo‘yicha koreyscha so‘zlar jamlangan:
📎직업과 인재 — Kasb va iste’dod
📎학습과 교육 — Ta’lim va o‘qish
📎행복과 성공 — Baxt va muvaffaqiyat
📎태도와 리더십 — Munosabat va liderlik
📎정보와 자연 — Axborot va tabiat
Har bir so‘z uchun o‘zbekcha tarjima va so‘zning kontekstda qanday ishlatilishini tushunishga yordam beruvchi koreys tilidagi misol gap be…
🌍 다양한 종교 — Turli dinlar
Koreys tilida asosiy dinlar quyidagicha aytiladi:
이슬람교 — Islom
기독교 — Xristianlik
불교 — Buddizm
힌두교 — Hinduizm
유대교 — Yahudiylik
무교 — hech qaysi dinga e’tiqod qilmaslik
☑️ Misollar:
⏩저는 이슬람교를 믿습니다.
Men Islom diniga e’tiqod qilaman.
⏩그 사람은 불교 신자입니다.
U kishi buddist.
⏩한국에는 다양한 종교를 믿는 사람들이 살고 있습니다.
Koreyada turli dinlarga e’tiqod qiladigan odamlar yashaydi.
⏩종교가 달라도 서로 존중해야 합니다.
Dinimiz bosh…
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @TopikAcademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🇰🇷 Korean Language | 한국 🇰🇷 @korean_language_kpop_dorama · 63,809 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TOPIK ACADEMY” (@TopikAcademy), 9,205 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TopikAcademy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.