28 Jul 2025, 13:42 UTC73 viewsread 12 August 2026
Bought 2 Reddit accounts, both working perfectly. Smooth deal, great service. Recommended.
Channel
TopOfAllTime Vouches
@TopOfAllTimeVouches
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002314623030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TopOfAllTimeVouches |
| Description | This channel is to share vouches/reviews from people that have bought services from us. Here's the main channel so you can check the Reddit accounts we have for sale: https://t.me/TopOfAllTimeAccounts |
| Created | 21 September 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TopOfAllTimeVouches |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 12 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 12 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 21 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
23 Jul 2025, 14:47 UTC78 viewsread 12 August 2026
I bought a reddit account from @topofalltime for 50$, 2k karma post and 200 karma post and the service was really good, fast delivery and he answered all my questions
23 Jul 2025, 14:39 UTC78 viewsread 12 August 2026
Of the best accounts I've tried, good instructions, good service and speed, which is what is most appreciated. I will continue buying, especially with how difficult it is to find good accounts because of all the bans and scammers out there.
6 Dec 2024, 08:55 UTC104 viewsread 12 August 2026
Great reddit acc everything went smoothly would definitely do bussines with u again
11 Nov 2024, 21:20 UTC100 viewsread 12 August 2026
@topofalltime the best seller on Reddit, answers all details and gives you very effective information, great seller.
28 Sept 2024, 10:29 UTC105 viewsread 12 August 2026
@topofalltime one of the best Reddit acc sellers I've used..good accs sends all details efficiently, good price. Will use again when I need more
23 Sept 2024, 23:28 UTC100 viewsread 12 August 2026
I've already bought from other sellers but you're the one that gave me the most attention, I'll buy again whenever I need to
23 Sept 2024, 00:02 UTC93 viewsread 12 August 2026
The delivery of the accounts was fast and everything was fine.
22 Sept 2024, 15:56 UTC90 viewsread 12 August 2026
Very good service, quality accounts and very fast delivery! 100% recommendable 🤝
22 Sept 2024, 14:25 UTC77 viewsread 12 August 2026
I bought a pack of 19 accounts from them for my models. Delivery was fast and the accounts are all legit 👍🏻
22 Sept 2024, 09:48 UTC66 viewsread 12 August 2026
Bought 2 accs some weeks ago and everything was good and smooth. Legit guy
21 Sept 2024, 21:46 UTC68 viewsread 12 August 2026
accounts always delivered fast and never had issues with them price to value ratio is really far ahead comparing to other suppliers 🤝
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @TopOfAllTimeVouches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 149,438 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TopOfAllTime Vouches” (@TopOfAllTimeVouches), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TopOfAllTimeVouches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.