Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 49 days, net -343. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 14,880โ15,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 14:58
14,932
-38
19 Sept 2026, 01:20
14,970
-25
16 Sept 2026, 14:38
14,995
-23
14 Sept 2026, 18:41
15,018
-14
13 Sept 2026, 05:40
15,032
-1
11 Sept 2026, 10:18
15,033
-13
8 Sept 2026, 16:18
15,046
-22
5 Sept 2026, 13:00
15,068
-29
3 Sept 2026, 15:14
15,097
-8
2 Sept 2026, 07:08
15,105
-14
1 Sept 2026, 09:44
15,119
-25
31 Aug 2026, 09:37
15,144
-9
30 Aug 2026, 12:54
15,153
-7
29 Aug 2026, 15:05
15,160
-1
28 Aug 2026, 15:41
15,161
-11
27 Aug 2026, 14:28
15,172
+5
26 Aug 2026, 11:56
15,167
+4
25 Aug 2026, 09:02
15,163
-9
24 Aug 2026, 09:44
15,172
-9
22 Aug 2026, 20:02
15,181
first reading
Engagement
449 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
2.53%
avg views รท 14,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
377
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.10%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 449 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
449 (7 August 2026 โ 3 September 2026)
Views total
28,300
Reactions total
876
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 54s
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
5,065 reactions across 447 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
1,528
30.2%
๐
1,252
24.7%
๐ฅ
876
17.3%
๐ฏ
341
6.73%
๐คฉ
327
6.46%
๐
224
4.42%
๐ณ
97
1.92%
๐
91
1.80%
โก
72
1.42%
๐
56
1.11%
๐คฏ
55
1.09%
๐ฅฐ
25
0.494%
๐
24
0.474%
๐
23
0.454%
๐
19
0.375%
๐
16
0.316%
๐
16
0.316%
๐
9
0.178%
๐ค
6
0.118%
๐ญ
5
0.099%
2 further kinds
3
0.059%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 447 of the 449 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 5,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 449 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐คฉ MEDIUM IMPACT NEWS ๐คฉ
TONIGHT COULD GET INTERESTING FOR GOLD. ๐
8:30PM(GMT+8) โ First reaction 10:00PM(GMT+8) โ Another potential catalyst
Gold could change character quickly between both releases.
STAY SHARP. STAY ALERT. FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS.
Sources: https://www.forexfactory.com
THE MOST IMPORTANT NUMBER IN MARTINGALE ISNโT YOUR LOT SIZE.
Itโs:
โHow much of my account can this entire sequence risk?โ
Example:
Account โ $10,000
Maximum sequence risk โ 2%
Total risk budget โ $200
Thatโs a much healthier way to think about layering. ๐
โ๏ธ @Top1Trades_LiveChat
๐บ๐ฟ No chasing what we missed.
๐บ๐ฟ No forcing what isnโt there.
๐บ๐ฟNo trading just because weโre in front of the chart.
Remember to stay calm in any situation, avoid emotional trading. ๐ฏ
Fly Away!! ๐
TP2 Hit! Running +122pips from lowest entries! ๐ฏ
Secure some, set BEโs if you want to hold๐
Personally, I closed all my positions๐ต
Showing the 12 most recent of 449 posts we hold for @Top1Trades. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ITโS DAY 3. WHATโS MORE IMPORTANT TO YOU RIGHT NOW?
๐ฐ Weekly profit33%
๐ก Keeping drawdown low33%
๐ฏ Finding one A+ setup57%
๐ง Staying disciplined43%
๐ Understanding Gold better38%
๐ฅ Catching the big move of the week29%
The shares total 233%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Day 3 check-in: Whatโs your biggest focus today? ๐
๐ฏ Find 1 A+ setup46%
๐ฐ Protect this weekโs profit29%
๐ Push for more50%
๐ง Trade with zero emotion43%
The shares total 168%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Midweek question: when do you know your bias is wrong? ๐ค
๐ฅณ Key structure breaks46%
๐ฅณ Momentum dies30%
๐ฅณ Dollar/yields stop support16%
๐ฅณ Only after my SL gets hit35%
๐ฅณ Price keeps rejecting my direction41%
๐ฅณ Liquidity shifts to the opposite side24%
The shares total 192%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
How are you reading Gold ahead of tonightโs news? ๐ซ
Bullish ๐56%
Bearish ๐ป52%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 449 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Day Trading Academy @Day_TradingAcademy ยท 23,247 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 18 September 2026
Chief Scalper @CPabloScalper ยท 30,623 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 6 September 2026
Vincent Gold Trader @vincentgoldtrader ยท 57,713 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here โ alongside 82 others โ read 24 August 2026
Arixander X @arixanderxx7 ยท 21,180 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 24 September 2026
CURRENCYBOY @CurrencyBoy11 ยท 24,531 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 16 September 2026
SYNTHETICX SIGNALS @SyntheticxOfficial ยท 32,744 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 4 September 2026
๐ฎ๐ฉ TheForexSupport | Free Forex Signals @TheFXsupportSignalsID ยท 43,500 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 66 here โ alongside 65 others โ read 28 August 2026
PAUL XYZ @thepaulxyz ยท 26,416 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 12 September 2026
MANTRAS GOLD @mantrasgold ยท 23,839 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 17 September 2026
SUPER SCALPING KING RYAN ๐ธ๐ฌ @SuperScalpingOfficial ยท 25,404 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here โ alongside 72 others โ read 14 September 2026
FABIO GOLD HUNTER @fabioforex ยท 25,931 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here โ alongside 75 others โ read 13 September 2026
ARRASH, GOLD TRADER @arrashfxreal ยท 26,635 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here โ alongside 80 others โ read 11 September 2026
ADAM TRADER @AdamWorldwide ยท 105,371 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 67 here โ alongside 66 others โ read 15 August 2026
Willy Gold Usd @willygoldusd ยท 37,063 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 4 September 2026
MIKE GOLD MASTER @goldmastermikeofficial ยท 36,316 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here โ alongside 80 others โ read 1 September 2026
James Gold Master @jamesgoldmaster ยท 130,677 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 13 August 2026
GOLDZILLA FX @GoldzillaOfficial ยท 27,082 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 10 September 2026
DOCTOR PIPS @DoctorPipsOfficial ยท 33,367 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 3 September 2026
School Of Trades @schooloftrades ยท 154,454 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 12 August 2026
GARRY'S SIGNALS @garrysignals ยท 31,227 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 5 September 2026
Market Makers @mmsignalsfx ยท 104,630 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 72 here โ alongside 71 others โ read 15 August 2026
๐๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ซ ๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ง ๐๐ข๐ก๐ค๐จ๐๐ฅ @FOREX_MARKET_CNP0 ยท 59,737 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 64 here โ alongside 63 others โ read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โTOP 1% TRADES ๐ฅโ (@Top1Trades), 14,932 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Top1Trades.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.