https://panel.leaksights.com/ https://api.leaksight.com/good/search/index.html
👍2👏1

Channel
@ToolsHackerSell
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
710subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002430872901 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ToolsHackerSell |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 21 December 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ToolsHackerSell |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 01:42 | 710 | +4 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 706 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 702 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 703 | +12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 691 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:44 | 688 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 689 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:19 | 689 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
52 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 18 | 34.6% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 21.2% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 19.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 15.4% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2024 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://panel.leaksights.com/ https://api.leaksight.com/good/search/index.html
👍2👏1
Webshell Upload Finder Webshell Upload Finder is an advanced security scanning tool designed to identify exposed PHP upload endpoints and potential webshells across target websites. Installation curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs | sh git clone https://github.com/Expl0itDurov/webshell_finder cargo r https://github.com/Expl0itDurov/webshell_finder
❤2🔥2
https://github.com/Expl0itDurov/webmailFInder Webmail Finder Check , Roundcube, cPanel, Zimbra # Installation 1. Install Rust curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSf https://sh.rustup.rs 2. Install cargo-run cargo install cargo-run 3. Run the tool git clone https://github.com/Expl0itDurov/webmailFInder cd webmailFInder cargo run
🎮 New high-performance WebshellFinder — scans over 14,000 🤨 paths😂 😎 Price: $30. @Expl0itDurov
❤1👎1
http://iamgini.com/wp-content/plugins/aafr/uploader.php http://kohanvietnam.vn/wp-content/plugins/aafr/uploader.php http://americanhighschool.ge/wp-content/plugins/aafr/uploader.php http://theonionbox.com/wp-content/plugins/aafr/uploader.php http://destination-croissance.fr/wp-content/plugins/aafr/uploader.php http://iamgini.com/wp-content/plugins/aafr/uploader.php http://kohanvietnam.vn/wp-content/plugins/aafr/uploa…
❤1
🎆Webshell Upload Finder – $40 🎆 🔤🚀Description: The ultimate tool for scanning websites to detect PHP upload points and potential webshells. Ideal for ethical security testing, pentesting, and educational purposes. 🤩 Features: 🔤 ⚡️ Fast Multi-threaded Scanning – handle large lists of URLs efficiently 🔤 🧐 Detect Common Webshell Signatures – automatically flag suspicious uploads 🔤 📄 Auto Logging – saves detected shel…
❤2
🚀 Papercut NG CVE Hello, I hope you are doing well — and I believe you are. Here I am sharing a Rust demonstration for CVE-2023-27350. System: PaperCut NG 22.0.5 Type: Authentication Bypass CNA Score: 9.8 CVE Reference: Here Author: @Expl0itDurov Channel: Telegram Libs used in Rust: reqwest = {version= "*", features = ["cookies", "blocking"]} colored = "*" clap = { version = "4.5.45", features = ["derive"] } c…
🔥1
File, posted without a caption
If you need a programmer to create checks, contact me! I also work as a freelancer. Se você precisa de um programador para criar checks, fale comigo! Também trabalho como freelancer. @forclogs
💔3👎1
File, posted without a caption
👍4
Config ForceVortex
PE32+ executable (console) x86-64 (stripped to external PDB), for MS Windows, 10 sections Windows
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ToolsHackerSell. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tools Sell” (@ToolsHackerSell), 710 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ToolsHackerSell.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.