4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,154–2,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 13:36
2,156
+1
10 Aug 2026, 07:50
2,155
+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:01
2,154
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:48
2,154
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 31 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37m 10s
Average length
37m 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
498 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
141
28.3%
👍
140
28.1%
❤🔥
70
14.1%
😱
65
13.1%
🎉
36
7.23%
custom 5404558404565875143
13
2.61%
🐳
8
1.61%
😁
8
1.61%
🌚
6
1.20%
🤯
6
1.20%
👎
5
1.00%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 498reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2024 to 21 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey guys!
We just found out there is a new token listed at Coinmarketcap with our name and logo: https://t.me/CMC_CG_NewList/16603
We would like to stress out that we don't have anything to do with it, the coin is NOT affiliated with TON BINGO project in any way.
Please be careful!
Ребята, мы только что узнали, что на Coinmarketcap кто-то залистил монету под нашим названием и лого: https://t.me/CMC_CG_NewList/1660…
ETERNAL TICKETS AIRDROP №4
Dear NFT holders, you've waited for long... but it was worth it!
Airdrop rewards:
12 USDT for each Golden Ticket
3 USDT for each Iron Ticket
Now you have something to spend in our new Instant Draw Game hehe
BTW, Yes - your profit sharing system includes the new service too!
Ordinary VS DEX-Buy Piggy
As we mentionned before, to a user the two piggies look pretty much alike. What differs is the coin you send and the technology of the smart contract under the hood.
In Ordinary Piggy, you send the jetton you want to win (you gotsta have it in your wallet for that, apparently). The contract tops the piggy up with your bet.
In simple words, you send NOT - the Piggy is topped up by NOT.
If y…
TON Bingo! Instant Draw - what's that?
We're getting pretty close to publishing our Web-App (actually, it's coming any day now), so it's time we revealed the idea.
The application is formed around smart contract-enabled instant lotteries based on TON jettons.
The word "instant" here means that each time you decide to participate, you get the result either the moment you send the transaction or within a couple of min…
👍15❤🔥7🔥6👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Ton_Bingo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 156,796 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Ton_Bingo named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@tonbingochat named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@anny_elfi named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TON BINGO” (@Ton_Bingo), 2,156 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ton_Bingo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
