@TonPlay — your go-to casino on Telegram
💸 Up to 9.5% cashback to your real balance
🎁 Up to $777 on the Ducky Wheel for new players
💰 375% + 200 FS on your first deposit
@toneplayeng — chat
Created
Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1,218. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63,429–65,013 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 16:34
64,830
+171
13 Aug 2026, 04:38
64,659
+100
12 Aug 2026, 02:07
64,559
+132
10 Aug 2026, 23:21
64,427
+101
10 Aug 2026, 02:02
64,326
+295
9 Aug 2026, 00:53
64,031
+294
7 Aug 2026, 23:17
63,737
+125
7 Aug 2026, 13:46
63,612
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 64,830 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,300
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.657%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
29 (24 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
211,590
Reactions total
1,390
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
310
Videos
9
Links
164
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
7s
Average length
4s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,390 reactions across 29 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5361706502241428597
619
44.5%
custom 5364072479465709511
446
32.1%
custom 5364261930473136524
325
23.4%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,390reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
393
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 29 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
115
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TonPlay_Official_EN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
This is unmissable, so we're repeating it 😎
The wagering on your real balance is now x1. You used to wager 200% of deposits and bonuses — now it's 100%.
No more wagering news — just quick and easy withdrawals at @TonPlay 💪
Cashback has pulled up to your real balance 🤑
Unload your delivery from 6% to 9.5% if not every game went your way over the past week.
Cashback is waiting for you every Friday at @TonPlay 🫰
The psychics claim their prizes! 🤩
There were 311 candies in the jar at the fair! Five of you were the closest and get 100 FS each to your bonus balance.
👌 Check the list if you took part:
1. 956d1156-****-4b9e-b3f5-3c9eb1dafa54
2. 852e3c5a-****-41f7-8068-0dda8590d6fb
3. a7814436-****-4956-8839-5dd51569eb51
4. 11f1fba2-****-439d-9c15-bec815ad7195
5. 52d84678-****-44d7-8310-77dd1fe5fdf8
Congratulations! Thanks to y…
How's your intuition? Test it and win 100 FS 📚
Tony wants to win at the fair and impress the little duck with the grand prize.
Will you help him out?
Guess the number of candies in the box and write it in the comments along with your TonPlay ID. Maximum number of answer options: 5.
The five closest guesses will get 100 FS each to their bonus balance tomorrow.
Let's begin! 💪
Fresh StickerQuacks are ready! 🤩
The ducks reviewed them all and picked three winners:
$500 goes to https://t.me/addstickers/TonPlayFuhul
$250 goes to https://t.me/addstickers/Mamas836
$100 goes to https://t.me/addstickers/Tonplay1_by_TgEmojis_bot
😎 Congratulations! You'll receive your prizes to your bonus balance today. To receive your prize, write to manager @Kirill_TonPlay with your TonPlay ID.
Thank you all fo…
Now we're giving away FS to the fast ones 😎
Tony, like Salvador Dalí, splashed a promo code for you with colors.
But he's an artist and sees a * instead of one digit from 0 to 9. Fill in the correct digit, activate the code on @TonPlay
The fast ones will catch 25 FS each to their balance. Catch yours at @TonPlay 👍
Our wagering got 100% better! 🤩
Because now 100% of the bonus and deposit amount is wagered on your real balance — not 200% as before.
It's the perfect time to check the "Bonuses" section at @TonPlay and see the x1 wagering in action 😎
Found a diamond among the slots 🤩
Not just one, but a whole 100 Burning Brilliants from CT Interactive! It's for you if you prefer simpler wins.
It has just 3 mechanics: a risk game, cascades with wilds, and scatters across 100 paylines.
A refreshed 3D Tony has gone off to catch crowns up to x500 in this slot on @TonPlay 💪
$850 for the best StickerQuacks packs are still up for grabs 🎨
You've already dropped some cool packs, but the finish line is only on 13.08.
There's still time to hop on the last train and snag one of 3 prizes to your bonus balance.
👌 1st place — $500
👌 2nd place — $250
👌 3rd place — $100
Terms:
🙃 Create a sticker pack or emoji pack with the project theme
👨💻 Include your username in the pack
😎 Send a sticker fro…
TonPlay cashback is better than Nolan's Odyssey! 🤩
🫰 It's not waiting for you in the cinema – it's already on your real balance
🫰From 6% to 9.5% sail to you not over 10 years, but every Friday
🫰 It will definitely delight you if not every game went well during the week
Claim your cashback at @TonPlay and leave a comment – what did you think of the movie if you've seen it? The ducks are just warming up to watch it.
Attention! This is what brings you $100 today 😍
Let's test your eye in the "Spot the Difference" game. 5 winners will take $10 each to their bonus balance.
You'll need to find differences in pictures of slot interfaces and mark them.
How it works:
🚽 Join the @toneplayeng chat at 18:00 UTC
😎 Wait for the host to post rounds
👨💻 Spot the differences and send back edited images with your marks
There will be 5 round…
What a week of wins!🤩
Yesterday Tony hit x10221! Who among you came close in the contest comments?
💪 Check yourself in the winners' list:
https://t.me/TonPlay_OfficialRU/384?comment=298554
https://t.me/TonPlay_OfficialRU/384?comment=298559
https://t.me/TonPlay_OfficialRU/384?comment=298967
https://t.me/TonPlay_Official_EN/344?comment=30608
https://t.me/TonPlay_OfficialRU/384?comment=299194
https://t.me/TonPlay_Offi…
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @TonPlay_Official_EN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 479,372 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“TonPlay EN” (@TonPlay_Official_EN), 64,830 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TonPlay_Official_EN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.