Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tomura️️ ️️️Valorant

Channel

Tomura️️ ️️️Valorant

@TomuraTm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,449subscribers

+420 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001764628965
TypeChannel
Username@TomuraTm
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/TomuraTm

Growth

15,02915,49815,263.56 August 2026 — 15,029 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,029 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,032 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,147 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,191 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,181 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,165 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,388 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,498 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,488 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,476 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,449 subscribers15,4496 August 202615 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 9 days, net +420. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,959–15,568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:4715,449-27
14 Aug 2026, 13:5415,476-12
13 Aug 2026, 01:5415,488-10
12 Aug 2026, 04:0215,498+110
11 Aug 2026, 06:2115,388+223
10 Aug 2026, 09:4715,165-16
9 Aug 2026, 12:3415,181-10
8 Aug 2026, 14:4015,191+44
7 Aug 2026, 16:5415,147+115
6 Aug 2026, 19:0015,032+3
6 Aug 2026, 10:0415,029no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:5315,029first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.93%
avg views ÷ 15,449 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.86%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held61 (1 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total65,338
Reactions total1,867
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 17s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,867 reactions across 61 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544739811777315795144023.6%
custom 544531774298915783443523.3%
custom 544487712229426199531116.7%
custom 54471838289698596941508.03%
custom 54451088658446517771176.27%
🔥1095.84%
934.98%
custom 5447321048879998127653.48%
custom 5445312919740885606331.77%
😭301.61%
👍231.23%
🍌180.964%
👾100.536%
custom 544525741158355224670.375%
🙏70.375%
😱60.321%
🍓50.268%
🌭30.161%
💯20.107%
🎃10.054%
2 further kinds20.107%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,867reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 61 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TomuraTm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC495 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Пост удалю через 3 секунды, если не будет реакций.

8👍6custom 54473210488799981275🍌2🙏2custom 54471838289698596942😱1

15 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC539 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

👀 Да как же ему сегодня повезло

custom 544718382896985969439custom 54473981177731579515custom 54451088658446517774

15 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC758 views23 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

Мяу 🐾

custom 544531291974088560617custom 54453177429891578343👍2custom 54448771222942619951

15 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC819 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

👀 Похоже, нас ждет что-то крутое. Тизер и утечка информации о новом наборе | #VALORANT «Когда цвета выходят за рамки воображения, начинается настоящий праздник для глаз». «Станьте свидетелями великолепия, превосходящего любые ожидания». Новый набор текущего акта будет представлен 17 августа. Ожидается, что ножом в этом наборе станет керамбит. Этот нож сможет менять форму и цвет.

custom 5447398117773157951111custom 54453177429891578341

15 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC844 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Коллекция Precision уже в магазине Riot Games! • Фигурка Clove (масштаб 1:8): $59,99 • Набор колец Clove: $39,99 • Футболка Sage: $29,99 • Плюшевая подвеска Sage: $24,99 • Ночник в виде Спайка: $39,99 • Фигурка Chamber (масштаб 1:8): $59,99 Вы бы купили ? 😘—Да 🤪—Нет 🌟—Хочу

custom 54453177429891578349custom 54473981177731579515

15 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC927 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

👀 Анонс нового комплекта Как вы думаете, будет кал или что-то годное? 🤪—Будет проходное 🌟—Что-то годное 😘—Ждём сливы Купить 💶😼Donatov.net Купить VP выгоднее, чем в игре: 5350VP = 3999 ₽ вместо 4950 ₽.

custom 544531774298915783424custom 54473981177731579515custom 544487712229426199541

14 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,070 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

😑 Туда эту сучку будет знать, как меня на серебро отпускать.😁

17custom 54451088658446517777😭2

14 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,130 views64 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

👀 Мой весь TikTok забит этим трендом, но мне нравится. А вам? 😘—Мне тоже. 🌟—Первый раз вижу. 🤪—Мне не нравится.

custom 544531774298915783437custom 5447398117773157951242custom 54448771222942619951

13 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈1,250 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚠️VALORANT не работает! Многие игроки сталкиваются с разрывами соединения и не могут вернуться в игру.

custom 544531774298915783417custom 54471838289698596943

13 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,290 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🏆 Первый взгляд на кубок Champions 2026: Riot спрятала эти изображения в коде сайта Pick'em, но они не остались незамеченными. Как вам кубок? 👍 — Очень круто 🤪 — Так себе 🌟 — Ждём слив Champions 2026

custom 544718382896985969430custom 544739811777315795113custom 544531774298915783421custom 54473210488799981271

13 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC≈1,130 views20 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Сука, ну почему итоги розыгрыша через 4 дня? Бабки нужно оставить на призы, а мне, блять, выпадает оператор Дракон. Какой раз подряд он так делает

custom 544718382896985969414custom 544510886584465177742

13 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,140 views106 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

👀 Если не хочешь такого же везения, оставь реакцию.

🔥6815👾7custom 54453129197408856066🙏5🍓3🌭1🎄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @TomuraTm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 100,558 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tomura️️ ️️️Valorant” (@TomuraTm), 15,449 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TomuraTm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.