A где радостные посты с подписью #MTONGA? 😄 🪙DTrade |🐶REDO trade | 🌕To The Moon Chat |😂VOX VPN 🖤Приватка |😉To The Moon

Channel
To The Moon
@ToTheLowMoon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
6,316subscribers
-178 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002361881814 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ToTheLowMoon |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ToTheLowMoon |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 6,316 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 6,330 | -13 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 6,343 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 6,365 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:27 | 6,384 | -23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 6,407 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:11 | 6,412 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 6,416 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 6,426 | -20 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 6,446 | -15 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 6,461 | -13 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 6,474 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 6,490 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 6,494 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 6,494 | first reading |
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
119 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 33.6% | |
| 🤣 | 26 | 21.8% | |
| 👎 | 19 | 16.0% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 15.1% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 10.1% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 3.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 119 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 29 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ToTheLowMoon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 3.45%
- 1 of 29 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 0
- none — marked by hashtag only
- Median views · ads
- 537
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 499
- over 28 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
😯 По слухам, два первых токена запущенных на платформе Hallow 🤷♀️ Ещё ничего не ясно и не понятно, но пока весь экзит увели в ларпуху, можно подобрать P.s говорят, что маффин первый, но это особого значения не имеет $MONKE 💬Чат: https://t.me/monkeonton EQAmJaTOz6MeuCPA4fr8ugqgHd4TuO5-U1Fp5JX9HK9RrxZW $TATER 💬Чат: https://t.me/potatoton EQAmVbnOPXMinHPATJidr7HqleQRfeDPJ3Stbgd70YwNq0N9 🪙DTrade |🐶REDO trade | …
🤣1
Свобода слова в интернете в течение 5-летки, канет в небытие?
- Да71%
- Нет28%
- Свой ответ в комментариях0%
- Комментарии в своем ответе4%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
Вера утрачена, но проект есть Всем привет , 🤙 Markel на связи. Давно ничего не постил, был в отпуске длительном (сидел в сизо) В общем, не суть. Вижу что завтра «дроп» сиксевеня намечается (моя жена подсела на сикс-севен, помогите)🆘 Как я лично понял, они ничего не заработали на мини-апке, а только потратили деньги, урезали конечный дроп, не ужели действительно подкормят? Апка не хайпанула от слова вообще, в план…
❤3🔥3👍2
😺 Если я вам скажу, что через неделю волюм будет 100 миллионов, вы мне всё равно не поверите...
🤣13🤯1
🏝Пока рынок (снова) даёт передохнуть, хочу поделится с вами полезными инструментами, необходимыми тренчеру для полноценной работы 🐂С ними вы будете полностью готовы к следующей бычьей волне. 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😐Итак, приступим: 🔴DTrade Самый популярный и удобный торговый бот, в представлении (как правило) не нуждается. 🐶Redo Trade Тоже ставший популярным торговый бот, заходите, торгуйте , богатейте. 🔴RUG SOFT (must …
👍4🤯1
🖥 Кстати если кто-то ещё не в курсе, в @TrackerNNBot вы теперь можете трекать до 1000 кошей абсолютно бесплатно 😲 Btw трекер кошельков- это один из основных инструментов дегена, если вы флипаете мемки и до сих пор его не используете, используйте☹️ 🪙DTrade |🐶REDO trade | 🌕To The Moon Chat |😂VOX VPN 🖤Приватка |😉To The Moon
👎5👍1
🤖 Here's what's coming in the next Telegram stable update (v12.10.0): — Built-in TON (Gram) wallet in Telegram. The built-in wallet will be a separate section within the app. Based on my observations, it appears to be built from scratch rather than using an existing third-party wallet, although the final implementation is not yet complete. [View 1] — Support for buttons in Rich Messages. Using the Bot API, you can …
❤1
🐸 Гм Kак перестать просыпаться в 3 часа дня? Mне это уже совсем не нравится 🤡
❤3
🔄 У $DASA обновили декс, проводят в чате конкурсы, делают новые стикеры. На таком говноволюме валяется на 16к. 🧐 Я лично считаю, что Нара должна быть выше, опять же если поддержка и шилл будет и от гройпов и от инфлов. Ну пока весь ТОН сонный, ждём постов, актива и Грам валлет 💬Чат: https://t.me/dasa_behindthestickers $DASA EQA6Ze_BBi0e-uoOLugKQEIrteRsuLbQFj5S6lhqdnYEVC-0 🪙DTrade |🐶REDO trade | 🌕To The Moon Ch…
🤡 99к мб твх, но надо допускать что дадут ниже или начнут высаживать или ещё что-нибудь, но если вы отчаянный гемблер то можно чуть зарядить, все таки от чела из команды гройпов токан🕺 $HONK EQAmWanX8ohlsG6qBpfL2ritCQ7tr7MlJpEK64Khm-O4742K 🪙DTrade |🐶REDO trade | 🌕To The Moon Chat |😂VOX VPN 🖤Приватка |😉To The Moon
👎2👍1
Маффину обновили декс, Халлоу в чате, можете зайти порейдить, икс надо качать Чат: https://t.me/muffincorgi https://t.me/redotrade?start=ToTheMoon-EQAmVFff4F53sDQgzCJv1f3LlSofxJgRBEagsAvGocW2HY-2 🪙DTrade |🐶REDO trade | 🌕To The Moon Chat |😂VOX VPN 🖤Приватка |😉To The Moon
❤4👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @ToTheLowMoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@ToTheLowMoon edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 8 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 8 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Свобода слова в интернете в течение 5-летки, канет в небытие?
- Да71%
- Нет28%
- Свой ответ в комментариях0%
- Комментарии в своем ответе4%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@whiterabbitsgram · 7,3224 postsRIX
@ByteBotstop · 521 postcripto_smile
@cripto_smile · 501 postDeFi Sage
@defi_6 · 221 postExit On Ton
@exitonton · 3211 postPolarOwl
@polarowlchannel · 151 posttgMEME
@TgMEMEcom · 2901 postTONалочка
@TONaIochka · 1,4621 postRocket max
@xrocketmax · 1,3201 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@ToTheMoonTalks · 2,22615 postsxRocket
@xrocket · 535,77715 poststeleLakel
@telelakel · 17,5252 posts$2500+ buys/sells
@bigbuysels · 1,4811 postGasPump Deploys
@gaspump_deploys · 1451 postMigrations on TON
@NoNameMigrations · 3511 postStonks Deploys
@NoNameStonks · 7221 postTopblast Deploys
@NoNameTopblast · 1,2261 postNoName Trending
@NoNameTrending · 101 postBLUM/BigPump/TONFUN deploys
@pocketfi_deploys · 1,2181 postStonksNewPairs
@stonks_new_deploys · 3211 postTon Dexscreener updates
@tondexscreenerupdates · 1,8961 postTONKOL
@tonkoltrades · 1,0461 postTON Status
@tonstatus · 157,6301 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“To The Moon” (@ToTheLowMoon), 6,316 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ToTheLowMoon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.