休息了,开课通知哈🥰🥰

Channel
泉州晋江婷婷
@Ting88ting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,173subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003785087570 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ting88ting |
| Description | https://t.me/Ting88ting |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ting88ting |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 1,173 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 1,173 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 49.0%
- avg views ÷ 1,173 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 574
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.209%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (10 September 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,020 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 33
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
福建群 @fjlaosiji01 专用报告模板 『总体评级』:a 【日期】:9月25 【老师花名】:#婷婷 【联系方式】:@tingting621 【验证人】:@Whhng5578 【地 区 】:丰泽 【颜值/打扮】:7(满分10分) 【身材曲线】:7 【服务水平】:8 【人照相似】:8 【性 价 比】:400/p 【目测年龄】:28 【体型】:身高160左右,罩杯d吧 【皮肤】:正常肤色, 【详情】:又是出击的一天,这次是第三次找婷婷ls了,来到熟悉的地方,来到浴室直接一手水中萧,看着老师的大奶,就是这个感觉,棒棒硬,趴在床上,老师还是经典毒龙,然后直接胯下深喉,非常的nice,然后提枪上马,先让老师女上一下,然后开始床边乱插,经典在老师的骚叫下交货了,没想到的是老师这次还有回笼萧,不错不错 【妹子优点】:口活好,服务好 【妹子缺点】: 【推荐指数】⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
新苏轼传报告,满分🔟 【时间】:2026.9.25 【老师】:@Ting66ting 【水费】:4 【留名】:周公 【人照】:8.5 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【过程】:中秋当天突然心血来潮,想上个早课,可惜没几个老师有开这么早,突然想到婷婷老师有开早课,随机约好时间出击,到地方遥控上门,进门,进门看到婷婷老师还好不是照片,果断交水费,随后进浴室洗了。洗的时候还给你来一下水中箫,随后帮擦身体,上床后开始服务,先是一堆战袍让你挑选,选完开始服务,挑逗,AB面,毒龙有点羞耻,对这个项目无感。进入状态后,开始步入正题,十八般武艺轮番上阵,狠狠凿了老师二十几分钟,最终在老师的帮助下成功出水。个人感觉服务不输会所的,态度也非常好。
❤1
@tingting621号被封了,这里可以联系
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Ting88ting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“泉州晋江婷婷” (@Ting88ting), 1,173 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ting88ting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.