Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -330. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,747–6,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 08:51
5,796
-18
6 Nov 2026, 21:38
5,814
-7
1 Nov 2026, 00:56
5,821
-15
29 Oct 2026, 07:37
5,836
-6
26 Oct 2026, 02:51
5,842
-13
22 Oct 2026, 17:21
5,855
-18
19 Oct 2026, 02:26
5,873
-21
16 Oct 2026, 11:15
5,894
-29
13 Oct 2026, 08:20
5,923
+25
7 Oct 2026, 01:38
5,898
-19
30 Sept 2026, 04:56
5,917
-20
19 Sept 2026, 17:42
5,937
-23
14 Sept 2026, 19:57
5,960
-14
11 Sept 2026, 13:20
5,974
-16
7 Sept 2026, 04:56
5,990
-39
2 Sept 2026, 17:37
6,029
-17
30 Aug 2026, 08:18
6,046
-6
26 Aug 2026, 23:13
6,052
-8
24 Aug 2026, 02:05
6,060
-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:53
6,069
first reading
Engagement
100 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.90%
avg views ÷ 5,796 subscribers
Avg views / post
168
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 100 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
100 (6 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
2,357
Reactions total
159
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 17:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52m 15s
Average length
1m 48s
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,946 reactions across 100 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
682
35.0%
🤬
397
20.4%
👍
321
16.5%
😡
91
4.68%
👏
78
4.01%
😢
54
2.77%
🤣
53
2.72%
😁
44
2.26%
🤮
43
2.21%
🤔
37
1.90%
🤩
35
1.80%
😎
30
1.54%
😍
26
1.34%
👎
23
1.18%
😘
18
0.925%
💯
8
0.411%
💔
4
0.206%
😱
2
0.103%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 100 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,946 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 100 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔠"ƏSARƏT" sənədli filmi
/3-cü hissə/
"Əsarət" sənədli filmi Azərbaycan Araşdırma Mərkəzi tərəfindən hazırlanmışdır və ilk dəfə 2023-cü ilin dekabr ayında təqdim olunmuşdur. Biz bu sənədli filmi yenidən təqdim etməyə qərara aldıq.
Filmin hazırlanmasında məqsəd gələcək nəsilləri Əliyevlər ailəsinin xalqımıza qarşı törətdiyi cinayətlər və etdiyi xəyanətlər barədə məlumatlandırmaqdır.
Azərbaycan Araşdırma Mərkəzi əli…
💥 Son 24 saat ərzində Hörmüz boğazının cənub marşrutunda dörd tanker dəniz minalarına düşüb.
Nəticədə gəmilərdə güclü yanğın baş verib.
İran həmçinin daha iki tankerə birbaşa raket zərbələri endirib.
Zədələnmiş gəmilərin ümumi sayı altıya çatdı.
☄️ Üç gündə 19 şəhid: İşğalçı İsrail ordusu Qəzzada qaçqın düşərgələrinə, universitetə və polisə bir sıra zərbələr endirib
🔴Yerli Səhiyyə Nazirliyinin məlumatına görə, son üç gündə Qəzza zolağında İsrailin hava hücumları nəticəsində ən azı 19 fələstinli həlak olub. Hədəflər arasında Xan Yunisdə məcburi köçkünlər üçün çadır düşərgəsi və Tətbiqi Elmlər Universitet Kollecinin (UCAS) kampusu, eləcə də Əl-Məvasi sahil …
☄️Ted Kruz deyir: "Mən Demokratların Trampı və ailəsini araşdıracağını, Heqseti impiçment etməyə çalışacağını və Ali Məhkəməyə namizəd olan hər hansı bir şəxsin iki il müddətinə bloklanacağını proqnozlaşdırıram.
🔴 İki illik tammiqyaslı qrup müharibəsinə hazır olun!
🔴 Əlavə edim ki, Demokratlar administrasiya ilə razılığa gələ bilməsələr, hətta büdcə məsələsində Trampla qarşıdurmaya girə bilərlər. Məsələn, İrana qar…
☄️Mənim adım Əbdürrəhman Məhəmməd əs-Səiddir.
Qələbəmdən danışarkən həmişə "İnşaAllah" (Allah qoysa) ifadəsini işlətmişəm.
Amma bu gün, bu gecə “İnşaAllah”ı “Əlhəmdulillah” (“Allaha həmd olsun”) ilə əvəz edə bilərik.
Əlhəmdulillah, mən qalib gəldim.
⚫️ABŞ-ın ilk müsəlman senatoru kimi 3 yanvarda vəzifəsinin icrasına başlayacaq və son aylarda Tramp və onun vitse-prezidenti tərəfindən dəfələrlə ittihamların hədəfi …
🇮🇷İran Müdafiə Nazirliyinin alimləri növbəti müharibə üçün gözlənilməz bir silah hazırlayıblar.
İranın Ali Liderinin Müdafiə Nazirliyindəki nümayəndəsi bildirib:
🟠"Müdafiə Nazirliyinin və Silahlı Qüvvələrin alimləri, ekspertləri və mütəxəssisləri ABŞ və İsrail ilə yeni qarşıdurma halında düşməni təəccübləndirəcək bir sıra yeni silah növləri hazırlayıblar.
🟠Biz həmçinin amerikalıları xəbərdarlıq etdik ki, əgər onla…
☄️🤡 Məğlub bir təlxəyin etirafı:
Benzin qiymətlərinin artmasının səbəbi İran idi.
P.S. Cəhənnəmə get, ey axmaq!
Mediada mövcud olan fikrin əksinə olaraq, inanıram ki, ABŞ Konqres seçkilərində Respublikaçılar və şəxsən Tramp üçün bu sarsıdıcı və tarixi məğlubiyyət Trampın İrana qarşı müharibəni yenidən başlatmaq qərarını daha da çətinləşdirəcək.
Tramp və onun silahdaşları, özlərinin dediyi kimi, Trampın irsini qor…
🇮🇷☄️⭕️Cinayətkar İsrail ABŞ-a Tehranın kimyəvi silah istifadəsini nəzərdən keçirdiyinə dair kəşfiyyat məlumatları təqdim edib.
🔍 The New York Times qəzetinin verdiyi məlumata görə, İsrail Vaşinqtonla kəşfiyyat məlumatlarını paylaşaraq İran liderlərinin kimyəvi silahlardan hərbi məqsədlər üçün istifadə etməyi düşündüklərini bildirib. Təl-Əviv uzun müddətdir ki, müttəfiqlərini İranın gizli kimyəvi silah proqramına ma…
☄️🇮🇷 Tramp: "İnsanlar İranla bağlı hərəkətlərimlə razıdırlar, amma bəlkə də ilkin və qısamüddətli nəticələrə, yəni yanacaq qiymətlərinin artmasına hazır deyildilər. Bunu başa düşürəm, amma təəssüf ki, bununla razı deyiləm!"
😁16
Showing the 12 most recent of 100 posts we hold for @Times_313. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝐀𝐫-𝐑𝐚𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨 @Ar_Rad_info · 24,822 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Maraqli.xeberler @maraqliixeberler · 25,819 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
𝐆𝐋𝐎𝐁𝐀𝐋 𝐇𝐀𝐁𝐄𝐑 🌏 @dunyadanTr · 9,811 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 October 2026
اخبارفوری ایران وجهان 🔖 @Akhbariiran_jahan · 49,944 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 August 2026
القرآن صفحات أجزاء أرباع حدر تكرار @Ayman_swed · 49,955 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“313 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐌𝐮̈𝐪𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐦ə𝐭 𝐂ə𝐛𝐡ə𝐬𝐢 🇦🇿” (@Times_313), 5,796 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Times_313.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.