Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TimTalks - Timur Musaev

Channel

TimTalks - Timur Musaev

@Tim_TTalks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,416subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002070940548
TypeChannel
Username@Tim_TTalks
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Tim_TTalks

Growth

1,4161,4201,41823 August 2026 — 1,420 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,420 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,416 subscribers23 August 202628 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,415–1,421 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 07:231,416-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:051,420no change
23 Aug 2026, 23:451,420first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.0%
avg views ÷ 1,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
467
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held16 (9 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total7,011
Reactions total494
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

494 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🏆12224.7%
❤‍🔥10220.6%
7715.6%
custom 52357016880142172085310.7%
😁5210.5%
459.11%
👀81.62%
🕊81.62%
🎉71.42%
🤣61.21%
🤪40.81%
😇30.607%
👨‍💻20.405%
🆒10.202%
🌚10.202%
🤓10.202%
🤝10.202%
🤨10.202%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 494reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Tim_TTalks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC356 views16 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Congratulations, Vazira 💥

❤‍🔥10custom 52357016880142172086

22 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC359 views21 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9❤‍🔥65custom 52357016880142172081

19 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC474 views78 reactionsread 23 August 2026

come on! reactions! 🤣🤣🤣 Motivate me

🏆4111😁74🤣4🤪3custom 52357016880142172083👨‍💻2

19 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC473 views51 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Poll

Should i drop it on spotify?👀

  1. yes!95%
  2. nah…8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🏆26❤‍🔥116custom 52357016880142172084😁31

19 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC421 views44 reactionsread 23 August 2026

I wrote the lyrics and tried singing them myself 🤣 It was terrible, so I had to use a little magic to fix my voice

😁286custom 52357016880142172085🏆3🤣2

19 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC428 views42 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Drop your thoughts down in the comments! My first song 😁

🏆20❤‍🔥1064custom 52357016880142172082

19 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC404 views64 reactionsread 23 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3517🕊8🏆3🎉1

19 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC416 views28 reactionsread 23 August 2026

How r u doing?

🏆14custom 523570168801421720885👀1

19 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC418 views26 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

Hey guys

custom 523570168801421720815👀6🏆5

19 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC496 views28 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Hello guys! I’m super excited to announce that I’m opening NEW GROUPS! Why you have to join? 24/7 speaking support(offline/online) and access to a private group with authentic materials, books and vocabulary lists. 🗓 Schedule:; • Mon, Wed, Fri - B1, 14:00, starts on Sep 4th • Tue, Thu, Sat - - IELTS, 18:30, starts on Sep 3rd 📝Register at: Innovative Reception(Gagarina 95A), @Charmingwizard or @fara_myy

❤‍🔥12🎉6🏆41🤓1🤪1😁1🆒1

19 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC424 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥123😁3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Tim_TTalks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTCAnonymous Poll130 voters

Should i drop it on spotify?👀

  1. yes!95%
  2. nah…8%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 22 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IELTS Cambridge Practice
@cambridgepractice · 40,767
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
AZIZON.UZ
@azizon_uz · 54,589
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TimTalks - Timur Musaev” (@Tim_TTalks), 1,416 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Tim_TTalks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.